The Ferguson Fix Is In

by Matthew Vadum
August 20, 2014



As mass hysteria over the fatal shooting of a Ferguson, Missouri resident Michael Brown grips the progressive movement, President Obama is sending the most divisive, corrupt race-baiter in his cabinet to the riot-torn St. Louis suburb where the suspect died.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who has single-mindedly focused on converting the Department of Justice into a racial grievance incubator, is scheduled to visit Ferguson, Mo., today in an appearance billed as an attempt to restore calm to a community that has erupted in almost daily violence since Brown, a young black man, was shot Aug. 9 by a police officer. Left-wingers who believe as an article of faith that America is racist insist, despite the growing body of exculpatory evidence, that Brown was murdered by a white policeman. They will not be dissuaded no matter how much proof accumulates that the officer fired on Brown because he believed his life was in danger.

The visit comes as the Left’s narrative that the nearly 300-lbs. Brown, who had just robbed a convenience store minutes before encountering decorated policeman Darren Wilson, was an innocent gentle giant trying to surrender, unravels more and more each day. More witnesses are coming forward to identify Brown as the aggressor in a vicious attack on Wilson in which he tried to grab the gun of the six-year veteran of the Ferguson police force and inflicted head injuries so severe that the officer may lose an eye.

Yet the belief that Brown is the real victim remains strong in many circles.

Inane commentary is being churned out by hopelessly affective left-wingers at an impressive clip. For example, leftist lawyer Michelle D. Bernard told the under-medicated Chris Matthews of MSNBC that in 2014 — when the U.S. has a black president, black attorney general, black billionaires, and black professionals in probably every field of human endeavor — legions of Americans still hate black males.

(Excerpt)

Read more:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/the-ferguson-fix-is-in/

It doesn't matter whether Police Officer Darren Wilson was justified and right in shooting Michael Brown. There seems to be a legal lynching happening before the eyes of America. Just as James Foley was beheaded in Iraq by an ISIL terrorist, Eric Holder is appearing in Ferguson MU, to bring the hemp rope to lynch Officer Wilson no matter how justified the death of Michael Brown.

 

There is no legal lynching going on. what there needs to be is a clear investigation on the situation. This would include a shooting investigation on whether the officer followed all the proper proceedures and to get as many details as possible confirmed by more than one source. Given that the polcie are involved on the shooting, the only optionis are an IA team or the district attorney appointing a special prosecutor to look into the aff shooting incident.

If a law or laws have been violated by the officer, then he should be charged. The question remains whether the officer knew about the MB as a potential suspect or not given his actions on that day and why he grabbed him.

 

As each day goes by, we are finding that Michael Brown wasn't the "Gentle Giant" he has falsely been perceived to be. More witnesses have come forward saying that it was Brown that attacked Officer Wilson as he exited his cruiser. When BOLO call came through, Officer acted properly. Michael Brown attacked Officer Wilson rushed toward him and was shot. Nixon, Holder and the race baiters have biasedly pre-judged this incident. All Holder is doing is bringing the rope to lynch Wilson.

 

I do think the fix is in.

The Left was bummed when Zimmermann walked away from an obvious open-and-shut case of self-defense.

I think that racist Holder will bring federal charges and hand-pick a jury to convict the cop - evidence be damned.

- - - Updated - - -

I do think the fix is in.

The Left was bummed when Zimmermann walked away from an obvious open-and-shut case of self-defense.

I think that racist Holder will bring federal charges and hand-pick a jury to convict the cop - evidence be damned.

 

Seems very plausible at this point. They probably figure the black community can't handle 2 cases going against their mob mentality. Gotta sacrifice one white guy to appease the Gods of political correctness and quell the rioting.

 

Not yet, but there will be.

 

Like Trayvon, this seems open and shut, but if the officer was in the wrong, he deserves to go away for a long time. I always say, things happen for a reason. Maybe the giant survived this time. A year later, he breaks some girl's neck. There was obviously not a bright future for him, robbing stores and violently resisting arrest. Who knows what he did in the past. No way the robbery earlier was his first offense.

 

People use to know how to deal with riots unfortunately we do not now seem to have the nerve to do it these days.

 

I've said this 1500 times.

Yeah, I think the cop was in the right. I hope they find the same. The way all of it has seemed to me is just people using crap as a cover up to try and make police brutality and racism look way more prevalent at this time.

The people participating in any riots, or even demonstrations at this point - in my head, you're a criminal just for being there given all of the information shelled out.

 

So then you are the judge,jury & executioner ?
It has become apparent that the police of Ferguson can't control the situation,the Government was called in,how do you get that action of a "fix is in"?
Between all your villifying & hatred of the left or blacks or victims I don't know whether to believe any of the accounts you laid out!
I am of the opinion that," what happened" to the stun gun thing? Even the 2 officers that fired on the black male yesterday in St Louis that was apparent that he brandished a knife,was it necessary to kill him?
Same with Michael,was it necessary to put that final bullet through him-went from the top of his head,straight down-the kid was already dead with the first bullet to his head-that is excessive,don't you think?
They can't use the police car that the officer claims a shot was fired in,they drove that car away from the scene-it should have stayed at the scene for "evidence",now the court can claim evidence tampering,whether anyone tampered with it or not! That is inept police work. What were they thinking?
I haven't watched the news yet today,I need to go see if the officer might lose an eye-that's a new development!

 

So you're a criminal if you are peacefully protesting?

 

Just went to find out about that eye injury to the police officer you mentioned-come to find out-the jury is still out on that-no" police" evidence report has come out about it yet---so as of right now it's conjecture.

 

Do they have a permit to be there?

 

Wait I thought the 1st amendment is their permit? Isn't that what you were saying during your "outrage" at first amendment zones at the Bundy Ranch?

 

You don't remember the free speech zones the left were praising in the ranchers debacle. They need to remand in the free speech zones the pice sets up. Anyone outside needs to be arrested.

 

If the right protesters have to stay confined in a make believe free speech zone. Has to be a left wing invention. So should these radical mindless people.

 

I think Holder would like to do something but he won't be able to.

I've noticed that a certain sort of low-life prefers the implausible to a good argument and I suspect this could be what finally turns the left against Obama, they seem to enjoy how implausible their arguments regarding Ferguson are.

 

Does anyone have the right to use deadly force to protect themselves from a violent or fatal attack?

You seem to say "NO." You are of the miskaten belief that stun guns will stop an attacker in any situation. And they do not. Likewise, shooting a deranged man trying to kill someone just once in the chest with a gun will not always stop the attack. A person can be shot through the heart, be clinically dead, and still be able to kill you within 10 seconds. There are even cases of people being shot 45 times and still not going down. That's the good training that was needed for the cop (the real "supervictim" here) to put an end to Micheal Brown's attacks with six shots.

Nevertheless, a good modern high capacity handgun is the very best personal self defence weapon currently available on plant earth. No other tool or weapon is superior to it for daily carry and use.

Now suppose Micheal (Teddy Bear) Brown or a similar large violent man came busting into your home. Would you be able to fight him off barehanded? No.

A simple modern handgun, as described, would be the best hope for you and any older or weak person in such cases.

 

As is everything about this case right now.

 

Throwing rocks does not make for a peaceful protest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm5X3q5PBwg

I don't doubt that the police have been overreacting since the beginning, but the mob is certainly not trying to make it a peaceful protest either. I think both sides are in the wrong.

 

I agree the 1st amendment is their permit. But then you brought up Bundy and the fenced in free speech zones. Dumb move on your part. You think Holder will set up pens for the protesters? Why only pens in Nevada and not Missouri?

 

By definition, no.
At the point that this 'peaceful protest' is at right now, hell yes I would.

 

What are you talking about? I want justice but I don't want biased justice. I'm not calling for the murder of Wilson, nor am I claiming there shouldn't be a full and complete investigation. The only bias and racism here is that of the race baiters that have come to Ferguson and want to lynch the cop. With the apparent race bias shown by Holder's words, I truly believe that if it's up to Holder Wilson would be swinging from a lamp post. Facts keep coming out to show that Michael Brown was a vicious thug and was not surrendering as has been pictured by LSM, JournOlists, and you for that matter. Officer Darren Wilson didn't get up that morning looking to kill anyone much less Michael Brown, or have all these problems. He was doing his job when Brown assaulted him and yes the BOLO was radioed describing the perp as Brown actually was.

 

Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson - who shot Michael Brown - had 'serious facial injury,' source says
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/0...wn---had-serious-facial-injury-source-sa.html
1 hour ago
Aug 20, 2014 · Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson ... The Ferguson police officer who shot and killed an unarmed teenager suffered “a serious facial injury…

~~~~~~~~~~~~​

Ferguson: The Killing of Cops — and Other Footnotes in History
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...-death-of-cops-and-other-footnotes-in-history
It has now been reported that Ferguson Police officer Darren Wilson suffered a serious injury — an orbital blowout fracture ... Officer Scott Patrick, age 47, Mendota Heights P.D., Minnesota. Shot in the head and killed…

~~~~~~~~~~~~​

We don't see anyone within the Ferguson PD, State Police, or even Holder deny or confirm the injuries to Officer Wilson. Yet at least two un-named Ferguson police officer have acknowledged the facial and eye orbit injuries.

 

So,don't you find it strange that the police chief puts out a video PDQ that shows Michael shop-lifting,but doesn't put out a statement "right away" saying his police officer involved in the incident might lose his eye because he was attacked by Michael? Seems,if the police chief would have done that(bringing out a statement right away)it might have stopped the protesters in their tracks! There is video showing the police officer(Wilson) walking around the scene right
after the shooting-he doesn't look or act like he has a serious facial injury--just saying---
I say let's get more facts before the mudslinging gets too deep,eh?