The gay attack on religion is dangerous

Lol only in la la land have I ever heard anti-discrimination as initiating aggression. Whatever don't like it there are many other oppressive countries you can move to that support discrimination.

 

You merely have to think about it. Under anti-discrimination laws, a person who has violated nobody's person or property can have the force of the state used against him. So it is the state that is initiating the aggression in that case. Those who oppose the initiation of aggression thus must necessarily oppose such laws on principle, despite the fact that we may also oppose discrimination.

 

It is natural for a male lion to kill the offspring of another male when forcible taking his family. So, should we do this as humans as well? I'm surprised you use that tired defeated argument.

The only hate here is your fascism towards others. "Recognize my perversion or else". Hate all you wish. Isn't going to make me do anything against my religion.

 

It is easy.
Gays = special group.
you cannot add something equal to special and expect to get equal.
It is mathematical impossibility.
The only way to make right equal is to make it equal for EVERYONE not for special group only.

 

This is incoherant.

 

No, it is true.
If you modify equal right for the needs of special group, the right become special for that group.
equal + special = special

- - - Updated - - -

Incoherent only for incoherently thinking people like yourself.

 

Giving someone the exact same rights is equal, not special.

This is also incoherant.

 

Exact same right for special group is still special rights.
You can only make right equal by extending it to ALL not to special group.
You might benefit from taking this course https://www.coursera.org/course/intrologic

 

No. You really are completely incoherent here. Giving the same right that others have to a minority is just extending equality.

 

if you have two glasses one red and one blue. Red has 8 ounces the blue has 4 ounces. If you pour 4 more ounces in the blue that isn't giving blue special liquid.

 

It depends on whether or not you want to sacrifice the end of the equality of liquid to the equality of glasses.

 

You conveniently replace others for ALL.
Scam has been detected.
The key word is others. Not all others have that right.

 

I'm right either way though.

 

Certainly that makes sense if parental responsibility is a myth; otherwise, not so much.

Before I bother to click on that, quote somethng from it that indicates any of the researchers ever interviewed any of those children in person.

 

You can say whatever you like. You are protected by U.S. Constitution.

 

Responsibilities are not the same as a right.

Here is what they did in the study:

Is an online questionnaire any less valid than a personal interview?

 

Same is equal, not special.

Same is equal, not special.

You might benefit from learning English.

 

This is also incoherant.

 

So it doesn't occur to you that the responsibility of parents to provide good parenting implies the right of the child of said parent(s) to good parenting.

Can you read body language from an online questionaire?

 

Learning English is not going to change formula. equal + special = special.
Learning Logic will make you understand simple things.

 

what "special" are you referring to?

 

Religion has no place in law/policy. If a criminal claimed god told him to kill somebody to save the world, that would not nor should it be a defense. Similarly, you can keep your comforting fairytales to yourself so long as you don"t trample others' rights by following your beliefs. Gays only want equal rights.

 

Homosexuality is not equal in nature. It is a perversion. It deserves no rights period. People deserve equal rights, not perversions. Freedom of religion is a 1st amendment right. Only Christians rights are being trampled here.

 

Hilarious.

Several Christian business are inconvenienced when a few gay couples demand cakes - and by the time it's all finished, those businesses are several hundred thousand dollars richer. End of the world stuff here.

For the last 3,000 years, homosexuals have been jailed, stoned to death, chemically castrated, fired from their jobs and made test animals for "rehabilitation" therapy, all sanctioned by different religions and churches around the world.

And Christians are the victims?

WTF. You have got to be kidding me. This has got to be the saddest, weakest crap I've ever heard.

 

If having good parents is a right, then why is there no parenting licence or test you have to take before you can have children. Why can't children sue their parents for poor parenting? Why is there no legal definition for what a "good" parent is? Why are there still orphans?

Isn't body language a little too subjective for a scientific study?