The Latest: House won't vote to formalize impeachment probe

I'd like both please. You have neither.

 

If it is, I do not have it in my Home.

 

You care enough to read it!

 

Dear Giggle Boy,

One cannot ascertain what is nonsense and what is not without reading it.
Can't you even figure that out?
It's like the vulgar tee shirt a man was wearing in a shopping center.
I pointed out that it was inappropriate for children.
His wife said "Don't read it!"

How does one "not read" something, Giggle Boy?

 

Except of course nothing that you said here is true at all. :shrug: If it was then I'm sure you could point it out in the Mueller Report. Section, page and paragraph. I'll be waiting.

 

Here, entertain yourself and then you can then stick your nose in our business.
https://us.cnn.com/
https://www.msnbc.com/
Now for your side of the world, they have a forum here and this may be a great unbiased source to start a conversation with your mates,
https://edition.cnn.com/australia

 

Have not read the Mueller Report. Are you asserting that Papadoupolis did not tell Downer that the Russians had dirt on Clinton, that Trump was not privy to it, and that it would not be released to assist Trump?

 

I am happy with the sources I have, thanks. I love it when I am told not to stick my nose into 'your' business. My answer is always.....I'll stop doing that when the USA stops sticking its nose into the business of other sovereign nations. Deal?

 

nailed it!

 

So, you're stating something as fact when you have no evidence of such.

Here's the thing, I HAVE read the Mueller report. No one ever gave Papadopoulos any of Clintons emails. You should read it. Here's a link to it via CNN: LINK: Read and search the full Mueller report

 

Indicted for trial, charged for an impeachment and you know that, that is what happened with Clinton. No charges were brought AND the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General and the Office of Legal Counsel said there was no obstruction of justice regardless of the OLC opinion about an indictment. How many times does that have to be repeated?

 

No obstruction and no abuse. If the Dems had either they would be voting to start a full impeachment.

 

They gambled on Syria and now it appears that's not playing out any, another nothingburgerer.

 

Obstruction of Justice is going to be on the articles of impeachment and on the criminal indictments after he leaves office.

Bet.

 

Yes, they will. After the impeachment inquiry ends.

 

You mean the dem clown show that just made up new rules and know they don't have the votes from their own party.

 

Criminal indictment for obstructing a political clown show? LOL

 

Yep. That's why the polls keep showing more people in favor of impeachment.
Tell us another funny story.

 

^^^ More Leftists wanting to govern by media polls.

 

^^^
Another righty making a claim without any data.

 

So what's the hold up? They got nuthin, nuthin at all. Try not to be too disappointed when the official inquiry let alone articles of impeachment never materialize.

 

I'll bet the internal polls tell a different story. That's why Peluka Nancy is backing off.

 

Look at our economy compared Australia's pathetic one.

 

Yours is equally pathetic and both USA and Australia has been in the hands of conservative government for many years.....USA three, Australia...going on to nine. What does that tell you Peabody?

 

It tell me you can't read the charts I posted.