Well i guess the skeptics have been proven right. That is the IPCC's computer models are full of sh!t. Where Al Gore like to plant my steelcap boot up his arse. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ns-showing-planet-NOT-rapidly-heating-up.html
LOL! Daily Fail! The Met Office actually said no such thing and has asked the Daily Fail to retract the story multiple times over the last year since the Daily Fail keeps reposting it every few months. What happened is that the Daily Fail took a tiny part of the graph and declared global warming over even though the rest of the graph shows that warming is still happening.
Hey Tank Heard it on ABC radio this morning. Hard to find in writting i wonder if bankers owning our media has something to do with that. Anyway your wrong fullstop. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...a-standstill-new-Met-Office-figures-show.html http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...y-global-warming/story-fn72xczz-1226575710803
Sorry Colonel but you've stuck your lard arse in here once too many times. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...-Global-warming-has-stalled-admits-Met-Office Now be a dear and go for a run in the snow to firm that lard arse of yours up.
Why don't you knock it off Panzer, you are proving that Globull warming is a religion! Man even the out of control corrupt UN have had to admit that they full of poo! __ Trade Minister Craig Emerson refused to be told there had been no global warming of any statistical significance by any measure for the past 16 years. His ignorance and innumeracy was frightening from a senior minister in a government that imposed on us a carbon tax on the grounds that man was heating the world dangerously. Maybe today - at last - he will listen: THE UN’s climate change chief, Rajendra Pachauri, has acknowledged a 17-year pause in global temperature rises, confirmed recently by Britain’s Met Office, but said it would need to last “30 to 40 years at least” to break the long-term global warming trend… Dr Pachauri, the chairman of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said ... global average temperatures had plateaued at record levels and that the halt did not disprove global warming… He said that it would be 30 to 40 years “at least” before it was possible to say that the long-term upward trend in global temperatures had been broken. Thirty to 40 years of no warming before we can say the alarmists were wrong? What utter nonsense, since so many alarming IPCC projections were for dangerous warming by 2050. For instance: The IPCC draft report forecasts temperature increases of 0.8- 3.9 degrees by 2050 and a 20 percent reduction in rainfall. Water flows in the crucial Murray Darling basin could fall by as much as 35 per cent by 2050. This would cause a loss of up to 30 percent in Australia’s agricultural economy, it says. A reduction of another six to 23 percent is expected in the agricultural economy of the Macquarie River Basin. Losses are predicted in beef, wool, wheat and cotton. And: GLOBAL warming is made worse by man-made pollution and even optimistic projections suggest that the Earth will warm by a dangerous 3 degrees by 2050, according to a draft report by the world’s leading climate scientists. The increase will be the biggest in 20,000 years and is likely to cause drought, famine and mass extinction, scientists said. The report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has confirmed that humans are the main force behind warming and that further temperature increases are in store even if emissions are curtailed. In fact, two years ago we were told just 17 years of no warming would be enough to question the global warming theory: The hiatus was not unexpected. Variability in the climate can suppress rising temperatures temporarily, though before this decade scientists were uncertain how long such pauses could last. In any case, one decade is not long enough to say anything about human effects on climate; as one forthcoming paper lays out, 17 years is required. There seems to be an awful lot of goal-post shifting and denial going on. But one person who can no longer deny is Craig Emerson. He should apologise for and retract his false claim that I was wrong to say there had been no warming for 16 years.
Its oh so hard for these global warming zealots to even admitt that global warming has slowed down or stalled all together. The Met Office is one of the biggest preachers about global warming. They released their predictions and thats all they have ever been predictions about the warming stalling without any fanfare, they just published the findings on their blog here. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2013/decadal-forecasts If a skeptic handn't of found it to raise the alarm we would all still be in the dark. Now if their predictions where the other way around and it showed more warming it probably would have held a press conference to herald the calamity. Hypocrites, science is not by consenus or concealment, or by diception.
Care to explain yourself instead of just coming on here and rubbishing this or that. Why is it a fail????????? When the Met office has down graded their predicted warming by 20%. What on Earth do you call it then??????
So now these right wing nutters have redefined the English language and are claiming that "slowed down" means, "Never happened."
Hey Tank Most skeptics know that climate change has been happening since day dot, "right" other wise we would still be a molten rock of lava. We also know that climate change can never stand still, the earth's atmosphere is a dynamic creature not a static one. So stop claiming we said this or that, we said what we said why dont you say that. Now what part of this statement dont you understand. Warming has stalled and is not in accordance with their earlier predictions. Plain and simple. And thats coming from the Met Office who are champions of global warming.
