The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 1, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    They're spreading disinfo. I can use the same argument that you use.

    So why don't you prove the claim wrong instead of using the lame argument regarding "sophists". It shouldn't matter one bit what we 'think" of the sources. If it's wrong, then it's wrong regardless. So have at it.
     
    Shinebox likes this.
  2. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Exact proof of what I claimed above. Irrelevant garbage makes up 99% of your posts.
    Thanks Bobby.
     
  3. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,492
    Likes Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am surprised that Bob, the CT section rule maker hasn't advised you to stay on topic ... this is a Pentagon thread btw ...

    earlier in this thread , you had asked me for the link in the Coste videos regarding the Pentagon cameras which I provided ... did you watch it or any other minutes or seconds of the series of vids? ... of course you didn't !!! ...

    you're just pimping clicks for your paypal account ... and I'm actually cool with that ... you're a capitalist just trying to make a buck ...

    Cheers Scott ... :applause:
     
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Just more lies Bobby. Keep going.
     
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You haven't proven that the info in these two posts is wrong.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-46#post-1069601368

    Your argument is that the parts are interchangable. I'm no technician but that seems pretty lame. How can you prove it's true?
     
  6. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How do you know he's an "experienced pilot"? How do you know he isn't spreading disinfo?
     
  7. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah? PFT Does the same crap. They ban people for not having the same views they do. So are they sophists also and therefore unreliable?
     
  9. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,492
    Likes Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bob is running out of ammo ... he is pretty much down to his OCT worshipers (worshippers) insults ... but at least he's original ...
     
  10. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For you everything that questions or contradicts the OCT is "irrelevant garbage". But you can try to post hopeful "refutations" all you want and I'll defend your constitutionally protected right to worship the OCT as often as you believe it's true. And I will always use your posts to show all you ever do is defend impossible fairy tales made for children and the criminals who fed us the 9/11 fairy tale known as the OCT.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree the Hani story is an incredible lie made for children and you swallowed it (or pretend to).
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Riiigghhhtttt...

    Your post below sure does "question or contradicts the OCT"...
    ...and this one...
    ...and this one
    Like I said. Irrelevant garbage.
     
  13. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Trying to changing the meaning of my reply Bobby? Is that what you're left with now? Pathetic.

    You know you lied about Hani "not being able to fly a paper airplane".
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
  14. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Delete
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know he's an experienced pilot.
    http://thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/

    Professionals can be bought and/or threatened though I suppose.
    Tell us what you think of the moderators over at International Skeptics deleting and editing the posts of truthers?
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-46#post-1069601683


    The fact that whatever is behind the gate-lifting mechanism in this picture...
    https://256stuff.com/cgi-bin/pix?/gray/thoughts/2001/20010912/pictures/pentagon/000_m.jpg&nc&nb

    ...is too short to be a 757 has already proven that a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon.

    http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/09/top-ten-911-cons-fraud-vitiates.html
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-41#post-1069573496

    There's no proof that a 757 did hit the Pentagon.
     
  16. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Right.

    So he can't be trusted.
     
  17. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
  18. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The calculations have been done. This closes the whole case.
    http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/09/top-ten-911-cons-fraud-vitiates.html

    Why are you so quick to rule out what they say? You seem to have an a priori incredulity when you look at truther info and a naive willingness to believe when you look at official info.

    If the argument that the parts are interchangable satifies you and makes this other info just go away, you're not mentally equipped to deal with this topic.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-46#post-1069601368
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've never seen it happen. Can you post an example?
    http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?act=idx

    Anyway, it's a truism that truther sites ban known shills who are obviously there to obfuscate and mislead people and disinfo sites ban truthers who checkmate them in debates.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
  21. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,492
    Likes Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [Q
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
  22. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Anyway, it's a truism that SKEPTIC sites ban known shills who are obviously there to obfuscate and mislead people and disinfo sites ban SKEPTICS who checkmate them in debates.

    See? I can play your lame excuse game too.
     
  23. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Why are you so quick to rule out what skeptics of truther information say?
     
  24. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I posted information that refutes what you claim and your reply was basically "the folks who posted it are sophists and can't be trusted".

    Lame.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2018
  25. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey Shinebox

    Look at the pictures on this page.
    http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/09/top-ten-911-cons-fraud-vitiates.html

    A 757 is too long to fit behind the gate-lifting mechanism. The math is easy to do. I did it once but all the links are dead now. I'm FatFreddy here.
    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7169966&postcount=38

    All we need is a good wide overhead picture of the whole area and draw the lines and do the measurements and math. Any seventh-grader could do it. This closes the whole case and the rest of the info is pretty much moot. There's no proof that a 757 hit the Pentagon and the above is proof that a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page