No, the landholder would. I have answered that question from you many times. You are a waste of time and electricity.
They think after 10,000 years of human civilization they've come up with something completely new. Really?
Yes, I do find that to be true. Consider Progressives (the most flaming of flaming capitalists ev-a), they pretend there are 'problems with capitalism', and that the way to fix the problems is ask other capitalists (anyone but themselves) to do something which won't impinge in an unhappy manner upon their plush, exclusivist, purchased-labour, capitalist lifestyle. It's the ultimate vanity of the capitalist, really.
New things happen all the time, but this isn't one of them. It's just more of the guilt/vanity of the most profligate. Those least willing to do anything themselves, are always the most demanding of 'society'.
Good point! Maybe it means nothing... in which it means nothing to say we have a capitalist system..., and we can do what ever we want
Yes i would mind I am responding to others use of the term Frankly, i agree with you that capitalism has no intrinsic meaning. Much like the word hot
I didn't mention liberals at all. How odd. Read my post again .. I refer to Progressives (who are most emphatically NOT liberal), the most capitalism loving peeps you'll find outside the 1%.
No i cannot, because everyone has a different meaning Because it has no fixed meaning but i agree that definitions are important. So i suggest that you provide a definition and i will show how what i wrote applies, or admit it does not
And the most wealthy would end up with all the land, poor people could not afford to bid, or make improvements to the land such as shelter, electricity, and water.
Gosh. I thought you were above name calling here is a definition of capitalism from investopedia What Is Capitalism? Capitalism is an economic system in which private individuals or businesses own capital goods. The production of goods and services is based on supply and demand in the general market—known as a market economy—rather than through central planning—known as a planned economy or command economy The purest form of capitalism is free market or laissez-faire capitalism. Here, private individuals are unrestrained. They may determine where to invest, what to produce or sell, and at which prices to exchange goods and services. The laissez-faire marketplace operates without checks or controls
So where's the part about "capitalist proponents promote unequivocal orthodoxy as the supreme and uncompromising value... which they believe is the exclusive path to the optimal solution." And I didn't think I was name calling. You're a commie, right?