The Sciences of Time - Does Time Have A Beginning?

The actual true content and history of the devising of time is quite appalling mediocre science . The mistake is simple semantics , the timing of something is not time.

A timing dilation is not a time dilation although it is an aging dilation and much more complex .

 

A space elevator is being considered and researched but initial investment is extreme and material science is really not there yet. As for your "Brilliant" ideas and book...I have almost as much interest as the publishers in it. Do not hold you breath for financing as it will never appear and anyone who might is obviously bright enough to recognize bad investment when they see it.

As for your formula (n>n) = (n<n), I can only assume it is supposed to be calculus but makes no sense if I do. Stating n is larger than n is equal to n is less than n is nonsensicle gibberish.

 

Every scientist aspires to get published in a scientific journal;why are you panhandling?

 

I'm not begging , having a peer viewed paper published is only academic , monetary wise it is meaningless . If the world wants my Universal information , they need to put their hands in their pockets and pull out their bank cards .

Oh ! I have learnt not give ''you'' free information anymore .

 

Because no scientific journal would even bother with the rejection letter and he probably knows it....if he does not that says even more.

 

Like I thought , buy the book when it comes out then you will understand .

 

Nice try , trying to push and enrage me into giving you more free information to plagiarism .

 

I share my birthday with Louis Armstrong. But I could never play any musical instrument or sing worth a damn.

 

Spoken like a true huckster.

 

Guess what little man...The world does not want your "Universal Information" (whatever that is supposed to mean) so you get NOTHING.

If however you wish to spend a few hours fleshing your concepts out instead of blessing us with your brilliance just email the resulting masterpiece here eeditor.ijariet@gmail.com just understand it will be reviewed and verified original before acceptance.

They are pretty strict.

 

How about I sell a big item?

I don't think you speak for the world , there is quite few billion more people than you on this world . I send that link my work , it is giving it away . Why on earth would I want to give it away free and have nothing for over ten years of learning wasting my life away on the sofa ?

 

I don't conduct business with snake oil salesmen.

 

No imagination in my thoughts , the physics objectively exist , understanding everything is priceless . I'm not selling snake oils , I am selling me and my objective thoughts are a part of me .

 

In other words...worthless snake oil.

 

Knowing everything is worthless snake oil ?

Understanding is the key to any scientific investigation and progress.

''You'' can't progress in technology or anything else without understanding .

How about a laser incinerator for disposing of garbage ?

An atomizer if you want to call it that !

How about a force field that will atomize incoming projectiles ?

My thoughts are limitless .

 

At school when my teachers were trying to teach us about the big bang we kept asking them but what happened before that.

Because kids are bastards.

 

It's easier to consider what happens after a void and how manifestation began .

 

See...you just proved my point. Just as with everything else you spew these thing require "understanding" they cannot be built right now because we do not know how. Now is where you claim you will show us all how and then ask for money to see it....that is the definition of a Snake Oil Salesman.

Laser incineration would be impossibly expensive and require so much power as to be pointless, it would also require development of the technology to do it and burning garbage would not be the use.
Ionization by forcefield ( I assume you mean disintegration) would require these same things and if developed not used for that purpose.

 

That's not true , I would claim I need better financial support to write a book or scientific paper . I would claim that the book will give you the information to understand ''how''. Whether we could create this ''how'' is another story , I would claim I needed help in fundamental research experiments to try to create the ''how''.
I have a huge list of possibles that just need our ingenuity to succeed .

I have two golden principles

1. Possible

2. Impossible


I don't claim one or two lightly without having specific knowledge . I ''see'' the matter of the Universe most people can't see.

 

In a scenario the void of time, could be the void of when, meaning after the end of time/a point after points and times and afters , is equally outside time as before the start.
So why not use that?

Say after the end is equal to before the start in that regard, and try and work out what time actually is if we're capable of doing so as a species.


Ouroboros

 

It costs nothing but time and thought to produce and submit scientific papers though it IS time consuming and tedious when required edits are taken into account. You are incapable of doing so or you would have already. In science the request for financial support also has a defined system....we call them grants but to get one also requires work on concept and believable/accepted data to be submitted coherently. As it seems you are unwilling to do so, you are indeed forced to beg and do not do it well.

 

DIVING FOR DOLLARS
Science.

Don't be different rule. "They" make your life harder.
I use to counsel diabetics in the eighties.
The ADA told them to avoid there bad beef and eat more pasta.
Hope you can connect the dots.


Support the Space - Change Continuum

 

You said "if".

But, the words following that didn't describe nature nor anything that anyone knows how to create.

I'm sure you are aware that scientists watch particles come in and out of existence in the best vacuum they can create.

 

I say ''if'' in the context of ''if we'' , meaning if we were a team , but 'we' would be dependent to me explaining to you how to do this . Without ''I'' as a professional freelance writer to write this , there is no ''we''.

Of course I did not explain the nature of this , things of such are for my book .

 

It is science who needs to beg me !

Perhaps I should just walk away and not bother , leaving science stuck in the ''past'' . After all , science has not treated me well over my learning period .

Any project , written or experimental needs an amount of aging to write or complete . I have aged over a decade learning , now teaching comes at a cost . Is teaching in the form of a book not a viable commodity ?

Are Tesla's notes / books of no value ?

Is design of no value ?