The would be gun grabbers position all shot to hell

Where did I say yelling and throwing rocks would be a better choice? Another strawman argument by you. Kudos!

 

Because every nation on earth has response plans for nuclear exchanges that don't include "hey wait, was that the US nuking its own people or someone nuking the US?" waiting periods.

Not to mention the UN would come over to "help " us to death like they do in africa, and they'd bring russia china etc with them. To bring us "freedom" like we've done so many times. That would initiate a full scale exchange if it hadn't already been kicked off.

 

No but the teamsters did pretty good with them

Well like Logical1 states Socialist are the problem, and at that time Kent state and their flower powers look quite a bit like a socialist party and

OOP's they got shot at!

 

So you prefer to live in our perpetual war zone??How many were shot and killed in the USA yesterday??I would bet it was more than the number killed in Venezuela.

 

Well if you don't have a gun what else you going to do with a approaching tank? Stab it with a knife, chop at it with a axe, pee on or simply run or lay down in front of it LMFAO

 

More than your **** skinner.

 

The argument is "you should be disarmed because you can't fight a tank with an AR15".

Of course, the logical fallacy there is that you will do better unarmed somehow.

They're idiots.

 

Yes they do include those waiting periods because it only takes a few seconds to determine that a nuclear strike on the US came from the US.

 

Oh you're taking Chiraq... Well yes that is a leftist cultured part of the U.S, note the word "Cultured" an the breeders are the Democratic politicians..

 

Really? And when you scuff the paint, that does what to stop the tank from running over people?

 

Then see the 2nd paragraph. You're clamoring for WW3 and you wonder why all of us want to be armed?

 

The point is there is nothing you're going to do to a tank with a gun. Why would you suggest to lay down in front of it? Are you ok? I mean...I've heard some dumb ideas from people in my lifetime, but that one beats them all. Wow.

 

Perfect!

 

Name the citizens at Kent State that had guns.

 

We were thinking more stick the gun in one of the firing ports and mag dump into the metal box but hey man you do you.

 

Ya you're right, just run, that's the best solution I suppose.. Then again tanks have never won a war until the "Boots" secure the towns. Then again this is Venezuela and ATM these idiots are throwing rocks at people with Automatic weapons not tanks..

 

Oh gee I dunno.

What could I possibly do with a rifle that would be more effective than my bare hands.

Let me think real hard.

Oh I know. Shoot the tires. Shoot through the windshield. Shoot them after the molatov cocktail turns the insides 200 degrees and they try to get out. Shoot anyone coming on foot to support the tanks. Shoot up the supply lines that provide gas and food for the troops. Go shooting in areas the tanks aren't protecting.

I don't know. I guess you're right, being unarmed sounds so much better.

 

We both know if you were confronted by a tank you would run even if you were armed with a gun. As only a fool would try to fight a tank with a gun.

 

This might work if the leftist believed in it ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯

 

Tank: I'm gonna get you, lefty!

Leftist: Well, I got this AR15, but I guess the best thing to do is lay on the ground in front of it.

 

Ya, then again the topic is Venezuela and those sheep are not dealing with tanks slick..

 

How exactly would the UN invade us over our veto?

 

A tank didn't run over protesters in Venezuela? Are you sure?

 

Both would be equally effective against a tank.

 

Tires and windshield on a tank? Have you never seen a tank before?