These are the two Democrats who voted 'no' on the impeachment inquiry resolution

Then is still now.

Good luck with your "syllable by syllable" recording of Trump's voice.....carrying you off to sleep.

I assure you, your constant repetition and mad lib posts stick out just fine.

I only remember you left because you were (against PF rules) trying to get people to bet their accounts against yours. Isn't that right?

Yeah. Those two Dems have an IQ over 80.

 

Baghdadi/Basta 2024.

 

Mmmm no, it would be in his entire foreign policy of helping Ukraine.

Unlike Obama who allowed Russia to invade, then refused military aid.

Tell me more about your "edited transcript" theory.

How many Russians were involved?

 

This message brought to you by Clinton, Obama and Biden supporters

 

And one more thing. Here in America we do not investigate a person to find out if he did wrong.

Here in America we investigate a crime.... when there is none and there is no victim, we do not investigate. Stalin, the Soviet Union did. But we do not.

 

Trump is not corrupt. Stop making crap up!

 

You are repeating a FAKE "narrative" that isn't even worth engaging.

Maybe someday, if I have some time on my hands.

As far as your PERSONAL Effrontry (that is AGAINST PF's Rules)...

But, I am a Good Dude (and it is "only the internet") so, I won't report your rule-breaking.

Anyway, let us get back to the Actual OP TOPIC...

This "back-and-forth" has grown incredibly boring.

ON -TOPIC:

As far as the OP Topic:

I hope that those Dems who voted "No" win their re-election battles.

(Although your insinuation about "IQ over 80" comes very close to the threshold for an infractionable "Group Insult" (directed at Dems.)).

You may want to consider putting a muzzle on that sort of stuff.

It is all good.

Carry on.

 

The Mueller report was a bust. It turned up nothing actionable. I don't know that he went crazy about it but it is understandable why he would have fought back and been angered by the constant barrage of BOMBSHELL headlines that all died during the week to make room for next weeks BOMBSHELL.

 

Sure he is. He had 6 felons in senior positions on his campaign staff, with more on trial. His latest felony is in the transcript of his conversation with the Ukrainian President. He wasn’t indicted by the Department of Justice due to a legal opinion and the fact that he has a lap dog as AG.

This impeachment process is the only hope that justice will prevail.

 

Oh I didn't say anything personal. Perhaps you could point to it for me with a quote.

You mean you won't report me this time? That's very nice of you.

You seem to be struggling with your knowledge of PF rules, allow me to help.

I can insult public figures all day long. Glad we got that cleared up for you.

It's not hard to understand, but if you need help, I'm here.

Did you just say I should wear a muzzle? As in I shouldn't speak?

Now THAT sounds like a personal attack.

Why would you do that?

Doesn't seem very nice.

As you were.

 

Trump is not corrupt. Stop making crap up!

 

We know the transcript was edited. Nobody disputes that at all. What matters is what was removed, and in the larger picture, what was said or done by multiple people at other times in relation to Ukraine, aid, and the Biden's.

 

You first. Your entire response here is complete fantasy. And you know it.

 

That’s it ? Your partisan opinion ?

Stop making crap up!

 

I didn't, and won't be, voting for Clinton or Biden. I did vote for Obama in 2008, but voted for Gary Johnson in 2012 and 2016.

But you have been a vocal opponent of all three of those people you just mentioned while implying they are corrupt just now. But yet, you vote for Donald Trump.

So my advice is this. Either stop pretending you have standing to accuse politicians of being corrupt, or stop voting for corrupt politicians like Trump.

Doing both at the same time is pretty foolish.

 

We don't? Dude, you better get on the phone and tell all the police departments and other law enforcement agencies across the entire country. They are all under the wrong impression!

Uh...are you sure you actually live in the United States? When there is reasonable suspicion of a crime, investigations happen. That's why you have an investigation in the first place, to see if something wrong happened.

 

Those 2 obviously not nearly enough to hinder their ambitions.

IMO, it comes down to this. Will that fact that Trump was impeached (it currently looks that way), weaken or damage him in the 2020 election.

That, (IMO) is anyone's guess. The Dems are "all in" that it will. But the specter of Bubba Clinton's popularity going viral after his impeachment must be lingering in the minds of some Dems.

 

There is nothing more to know.
Get real

 

It turned up nothing actionable on the basis of Trump and Russian collusion, which was the scope Mueller was operating under. He wasn't conducting a general investigation, it was a specific one. That's why his report's conclusion was only that the President did not collude with the Russians during the election, not that the president had done no wrong.

 

Donald Trump is the opposite of corrupt.

This is why the corrupt try to remove him from office.

 

Which you believe because Trump told you so?

 

That may be the most ridiculous statement I've ever seen on this entire forum in the 7 years I've been here.

Would you like to try again?

 

Oh you do.

Nobody disputes that.

Biden is innocent, everybody knows that.

We all know Trump and Putin worked together to overthrow American elections.

We all know Avenatti would make a great POTUS.

We all know Trump has no path to 270.

Do you think these weak ass Jedi-ish mind tricks work?

 

No, I wouldn't.

You can tell who someone is by who their enemies are.

Donald Trump's enemies are the most corrupt people in our government.

They know he can't be bought, so they have to manufacture dossiers to get the stupid people in our society to help them.

 

No, they don't, and I've never stated that he is, nor have I said that Biden shouldn't be investigated. But, Biden being guilty does not mean Trump isn't either.

No, they didn't, and if you care to search my posting history, you'll see me saying I didn't believe it even before the conclusion of the Mueller investigation.

No, he wouldn't.

He certainly does, if he has enough supporters willing to vote for a corrupt dishonest man.

You don't need mind tricks when you're not making things up.