Those who choose to practice a particular right...

When it comes to firearms there is no such thing as common sense restrictions.

That's just double speak for gun control.

 

The anti-'s know one cannot exist without the other, however they also understand pushing for universal registration up front is a non-starter.

 

You'll have to talk to his minions. I wouldn't have voted for Biden if my life depended on it. No one is coming to talk all of our guns. I mean, feel free to worry yourself to death over something no legislator has ever proposed doing. I'll be over here enjoying life not worrying about what MIGHT happen.

 

correct they go one step at a time, ban something and when that doesn't work ban something else and when that doesn't work, you get it, I get it and the anti's get it, but they will never admit it.

 

They cannot demonstrate the necessity for or the efficacy of the restrictions they seek.
Thus, there is no sense at all to them, common or otherwise.

 

Re:

I assume that you meant "...take all of our guns." rather than "... talk all of our guns" however it does seem like the goal of the Biden administration to begin gun confiscation incrementally beginning with so called "assault weapon"

Since so few of the recent shootings have had nothing to do with "assault weapons", his ban on them will fail to reduce homicides and then Biden & his ilk will focus on banning the handguns that are responsible for the recent shootings and so the bans will continue until all modern firearms are banned.


First they came for the "assault weapons", and I did not speak out—

Because I did not own an "assault weapon".

Then they came for the handguns, and I did not speak out—

Because I did not own a handgun.

Then they came for the rifles and I did not speak out—

Because I did not own a rifle

Then they came for the shotguns —and then I learned what "common sense" gun control "for the children" really meant.



(Apologies to Martin Niemöller)





"TAKE BIDEN ON HIS WORD WITH GUN CONTROL"
https://www.nssf.org/take-biden-on-his-word-with-gun-control/

EXCERPT "Biden unequivocally admitted to CNN’s Anderson Cooper in a 2019 interview that he would pursue an unconstitutional firearm confiscation agenda.

“To gun owners out there who say a Biden administration means they’re going to come for my guns…” Cooper said.

“Bingo,” Biden interrupted. “You’re right, if you have an assault weapon,” which the former vice president deridingly refers to when he speaks of MSRs. “The fact of the matter is they should be illegal. Period.”

That goes much further than reenacting the failed 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, to which in the same interview, Biden agreed it didn’t reduce crime. That means he’d go after the more nearly 20 million MSRs in circulation today." CONTINUED

 

You even show Biden referring to assault weapons....not ALL weapons.
There was a federal assault weapons ban from 1994 to 2004....were all other guns banned and confiscated? No. Hell, the assault weapons that were owned at the time of the ban weren't confiscated. Everyone got to keep their gun. In MA, a ban on assault weapons was put in place a couple years ago. None of the currently owned assault weapons were confiscated.
I don't agree with banning "assault" weapons. It's beyond silly. Let me repeat that...I don't agree with banning "assault" weapons. It's beyond silly. Just to be very clear....I don't agree with banning "assault" weapons. It's beyond silly.

 

We obviously agree that banning "assault weapons" is just another feel-good-do-nothing scam that will do nothing to reduce homicides.

I very much wish that I could share your optimism that the gun ban agenda will go nowhere but ever since my home state, Virginia, came under Democrat rule, additional gun control schemes are very popular with those in control.

So, with a Democrat controlled national government and a Democrat controlled State government, I don't think that 2nd Amendment supporters can afford to let their guard down especially at this time.

Thanks,

 

You must not forget the Democrats redefine the phrase "assault weapon" whenever it suites their needs. In 2013 Feinstein tried to redefine it as, among other things, "All semiautomatic rifles that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: pistol grip; forward grip; folding, telescoping, or detachable stock; grenade launcher or rocket launcher; barrel shroud; or threaded barrel."

https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weapons-ban-summary

If she had succeeded your slightly modified 10/22 becomes, legally, an "assault weapon".

They are sneaky.