Transgender UPenn smashes TWO US women's records in weekend competition and finishes one race 38 sec

As many who don't understand the topic of trans has shown throughout this thread.
They act like they are experts on how every person in the world is, acts, or should be and act. It's ridiculous to know all about nearly 8B people of the world. And all you can do is pretend you are an expert.

 

You don't even read the story that is linked in the post you respond to? No wonder your posts are inaccurate.

1st sentence/paragraph in the post you responded to that had the link to the story in that post.
...
LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Aiming to help sports write eligibility rules for transgender athletes, the IOC published advice Tuesday shifting the focus from individual testosterone levels and calling for evidence to prove when a performance advantage existed.
https://olympics.nbcsports.com/2021/11/16/olympic-transgender-rules-ioc-athletes/

 

Well, I just checked and Thompson weighs 160 pounds. I’m not certain, but I would believe she weighs more than probably every female he competes against. Then again, a lot of women these days who aren’t athletic probably weigh more than him, especially with ghetto big butts being all the rage.

 

I was actually responding to what you wrote, see below.

They allowed a trans to compete, but not an actual female due to testosterone levels. So the rules are in flux and has been since women sports were created.

 

That was an old rule.
She used to compete, rules changed, then she couldn't compete. Then rules change again.

 

I remember when the Olympic rules were women had to prove they’re women via a chromosome test. That was back when East German women athletes were suspect.

 

IMHO, the IOC is one of the most corrupt organizations on the planet. I don't take their word for anything.

 

No generally that is absolutely not the case. Lol.

 

Then don't let him compete against smaller women. Do we make flyweight boxers take on Muhammad Ali? Jeez, what is so hard about this?

 

I've said countless times in this thread and any others, what determines a true female has been in question since the creation of women sports.
There is no clean on/off type switch between all male and all female. But there are some that just can't grasp that.
Even when asked how one would classify hermaphrodites the only deflection response is they are different. NO duh, they are different. So is the transition from male to female.

 

Well then, don't watch the olympics. But they have been around longer than many other sports organizations.
Especially on the international stage.

 

Thomas, 22, plans to break her longtime silence and exclusively share her story with Sports Illustrated, it was announced Wednesday.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...wimmer-doesnt-cover-genitals-locker-room.html

 

Many are taking your advice. Have you seen the ratings?

 

There’s no question to be answered at all. A woman was born to give birth and keep us going. A birth defect or not being physically able to get pregnant does not change that. And I’m not sure why the left constantly denies the settled science of chromosomes.

 

So you’re saying this guy should only swim against women in his weight category?

 

What is a female to you?

 

A female to me; anyone who is naturally ordered towards gestation.

So a girl before puberty is still female as is one who is past menopause. Or one who through some disorder cannot have children. Or who has had their bits removed.

All females.

This dude. Not a female. I do not wish to appropriate females by daring to suggest that they wear dresses, have long hair or like the color pink.

That's a stereotype of females we've long since gotten rid of socially.

 

There is something that you can not do. You are incapable of defining what a woman is. I can.

Woman - Adult human female having X-Y chromosones

Using my definition, I could tell that this was not a woman INSTANTLY.


Because you are completely incapable of defining what a woman is, your suggestion that transvestites are women is meaningless. For it to mean something, you must first be capable of defining what a woman is. Nobody with your beliefs can.

Thank you Matt Walsh!

 

Not all women are capable of giving birth. So, not all women can physically get pregnant
I'm not sure why the followers of the 2X impeached think every person is physically, mentally, and biologically the same and fit into a neat little binary box.

 

A woman is someone who is naturally ordered towards gestation. That's every female you tried to describe as a gotcha to the definition.

Thanks for playing.

 

In general terms? Or one that would include 100% of those that you would call female.

99% or so are those that have the ability to produce eggs for reproduction. But that won't include 100% of those that the could fit that definition.
What sex is a hermaphrodite, those considered intersex persons?

You do know, the transition from all male to all female carries many variants of intersex people. It is not light a light switch and a binary transition.

 

You think 100% of those who could be considered naturally ordered towards gestation, whatever that is, is a female? Like it's a light switch? LOL.

Now all you have to prove is all those intersex persons, transgendered persons are naturally ordered towards gestation, whatever that is.

 

I don't have to define what a woman is. You can't define one either. You can pick a definition you agree with, but that does not make up the entirety of a human person or an animal being.

In terms of the sport, they have a team of experts that has been involved in determining what qualifies as a female in their sport. And those definitions have never been stable because it is a difficult term to define at the edge. It's been an issue of who is qualified and who is not since the inception of female sports going back some 100 yrs.

So no, I don't have any reason to define a woman for a sports league I am not involved in. And neither can you. You just make up what fits your narrative.

 

Dude is a hero! He is advancing Women's Sports to levels never before seen! Michael Jordon, Babe Ruth, Joe Montana, and this dude.... amazing!

 

go look up gestation then I guess? Means nature is angling you towards gestation...not impregnation. As I've explained. NOT having the bits doesn't mean that now you are not female or male...sorry. As a society as a race as a culture we've had this most basic biology figured out for thousands of years.

Thousands.

Only in the last few years have progressive idiots decided that this history is somehow wrong.

So you can get all the wonderful surgeries in the world you want. Still can't change your gender. When you die and your skeleton is found, scientists will know which gender you were.

Gee? Why is that?

And before you try and toss out some other stupid outlier, understand that the people that are men now playing female sports because progressives have dove off the deep end? That's not them. They were not people born with both sex organs equally developed or some rare condition regarding chromosomes. No no no, sir.

Those are just men playing female sports. They grew their hair long and decided "now I am woman!" (because apparently we are stating that to be woman means to have long hair...or some other stupid stereo type) And you've bought into the confusion.