Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

That has to do with campaign finances. You would have to show that the information itself can be converted into some kind of payment or loan for delivery, otherwise, you're just grasping at straws..

 

I think it's woulda , coulda, and if news. I guess for now yeah it's fake news.

 

Belief and conflict are not the same thing but thanks for trying to twist things.. Failing i might add but i appreciate the effort!

 

Actually i did hell you replied to it! I guess you are so desperate for confirmation bias ( likes in this case) you cant keep track of a thread for more then a few seconds.

 

Really so you did explain why you thought the number of post on this forum was proof. Guess I missed it. Perhaps you could reference the post #. Yeah right!

 

Why is Trump, Trump's family and the Russian handlers so fearful of Mueller?

 

Post 245 for example.. Yes you must have ahem missed it...

I get your screen name.. I get that you think you can joke around and lay traps... I also get that you can not do either well.

 

You want to be subject to a General Warrant? We fought the War for Independence over such issues. You want an army of investigators to go completely through the lives of you, your family and your associates? No specific crime specified, we will just sift through everything, and see what we can find that we can fit into a criminal statute? You want to volunteer? No President has EVER been subjected to such a thing. And the only justification seems to be that he won!

Trump Needs To Be Smart About How He Fires Mueller.

Trump must eventually fire Robert Mueller, a partisan tool carrying water for his Establishment pals as he oversees an utterly corrupt “investigation” where the only person we actually know committed any wrongdoing is his bestest buddy Jim Comey. But Trump can’t just lash out and do it, though it is well within his political and moral right to do so. No, he’s got to do it cleverly, with cunning, in a way that shows the American people exactly why Mueller’s witch hunt is a flaming dumpster fire of conflicts of interest and contempt for the right of normal Americans to have a say in their own governance.

Trump has to set the stage before he pulls the trigger and puts the coup de grace into the temple of this appalling fiasco. He has to do it so the American people will see and understand why ending this idiocy is so absolutely necessary to preserve our Republic despite the mainstream media’s best effort to hide the truth.

Trump needs to seize the initiative from Leaky Bob. You know, I keep hearing how Mueller was this squared-away Marine officer, but through these incessant leaks his organization demonstrates a complete lack of both integrity and discipline. Mueller seems unwilling or unable to exercise any kind of leadership over his team of Hillary donors, or to instill a culture of seriousness and impartiality. The continuing misconduct of his out-of-control, ever-expanding fiefdom demonstrates that he must be relieved of command. And here’s the letter the president should send to him to set the stage to do it.

More at the link.

 

I don't lay traps. Just want you to explain why you think the number of posts on this forum prove anything. Now maybe an intelligent post might make a point ( oh, and 245 does not even meet that criteria) but shear numbers prove nothing

 

Simple, if Trump is innocent and the Russian did not lift him to and over the finish line, nothing to fear. If the general warrant was good enough for past president's under a SC, it's good enough for Trump to be under the microscope. You post ignore a lot and makes Trump a blameless victim. Wise up, no one is above the law especially if they have committed crimes.

 

Never has a US president or ANY American citizen, been subject to a General Warrant.

And The American Electorate knows who the real crooks are, they see right through you:

A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION MASQUERADING AS A POLITICAL PARTY. Report: FBI Seized Smashed Hard Drives From Debbie Wasserman Schultz IT Aide’s Home:

No smashed or bleach-bitted hard drives on the GOP side!

FBI agents seized smashed computer hard drives from the home of Florida Democratic Rep. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz’s information technology (IT) administrator, according to an individual who was interviewed by Bureau investigators in the case and a high level congressional source.

Pakistani-born Imran Awan, long-time right-hand IT aide to the former Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman, has since desperately tried to get the hard drives back, the individual told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group.

Shocking video shows former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatening the Chief of Capitol Police to ‘expect consequences’ if he didn’t return a laptop taken during a criminal investigation:

The laptop was taken by police following a report into data breaches inside congressional offices in Washington. Politico first reported that one staffer under investigation for the theft had worked for multiple Democrats in Washington, but had been fired after the alleged IT breaches. . . . The Capitol Police and other agencies are investigating Imran Awan, who has run technology for Blabermouth Schultz since 2005. He was banned from the House network in February on suspicion of data breaches and theft. Blabbermouth Schultz’s representatives denied the lawmaker was using her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief on the matter of the laptop.

Tell, that was clearly a lie. The Democrats really don’t seem to want people investigating this hacking case for some reason.

 

You are harping on one thing and ignoring the rest of my posts for a reason.. Nice insult btw i guess giving background information on one of the "Dream Team" investigators is not "intelligent" to you but harping about nonsense is...

 

Well that was the post I was questioning and you were attempting to defend. But glad you now accept that your statement was nonsense so now can move on to questioning if you actually understand how the legal profession works.

 

I have no interest in your spin my post stands and is factual. Rhee did defend the Clinton Foundation. The same Clintons that blame Trump for her loss in the election that is a conflict of interest. You might want to re-look at what the thread is about i assure you its not a courtjester spin and bait topic

 

Yes it is factual however your assumption that because a lawyer defends a client that the lawyer somhow subscribes to the same beliefs as the client is bogus and reflects a lack of understanding of theblegsl profession.

 

Nice spin what you said has nothing to do with conflict of interest...

 

↑
Educate yourself on what's being investigated. You don't even know what it is. It's about Russian meddling. This isn't a jury trial and it isn't about Trump. Good lord. The ignorance is astounding.

I can't believe I'm sitting here educating adults on what is being investigated. Even my teenagers know.
If it wasnt about Trump we would not have 10 threads daily about some opinion or leak from the investigation claiming they had a smoking gun about.... Trump.. How naive do you think people are to believe what you just posted?

 

Of course it does. You are making the silly assumption that because a laywer defends a client in a political party that lawyer is incapable forever in the future of acting without political bias. That is almost as silly as believing that because Trump has supported Democratic candidates for office he will always be biased in favor of Democrats.

 

I did not nor ever said political bias i said conflict of interest. Spin spin way Jester.

 

If you are going to insult me have the balls to quote me.

 

Here is a case where Trump's lawyer defended two Democrats. Guess that make Sekulow incapable of representing Trump. You can be a hero by notifying the Donald

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1989/88-2031

 

The last paragraph is a quote from your post! It is #73. Thanks for asking. The first two paragraphs are the post you were responding to.

 

Three out of 13 isn't stacked. 8 out of 13 would be stacked.

You do know that you aren't going to get 13 Trump donors on that panel? Our justice system doesn't roll that way.

 

No clue why you want to be "remind you" of what Democrats said?

So what you're looking for is an investigation comprised of Trump supporters. And that would be impartial....how?

 

Trump interviewed Mueller for the FBI Director job the day before Mueller was appointed special counsel by Rosenstein.