Trump-backed Rep. Mary Miller says at rally that overturning Roe v. Wade is "victory for White lif

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Patricio Da Silva, Jun 27, 2022.

  1. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    9,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're welcome. I hope that you now understand due process and will stop bumbling around here making those really off-base posts.
     
  2. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    9,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone want to learn about due process?
     
  3. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    18,287
    Likes Received:
    14,688
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ahhemm, not a chance! :D
     
  4. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,683
    Likes Received:
    25,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ;-)
     
  5. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,451
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When did due process stand in the way of Democrats hosting a fake committee that allows hearsay testimony without cross examination?
    Sounds more like you need a lesson on the difference.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,329
    Likes Received:
    63,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    if that were true, many on the right would be pro-Abortion
     
  7. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,329
    Likes Received:
    63,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    patting someone on the back is now considered assault per the right and deserving of long prison sentences
     
  8. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,329
    Likes Received:
    63,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  9. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,483
    Likes Received:
    16,555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The objective is to understand what happened on 1/6.

    If you want to evaluate the various elected idiots, then propose a direction for that.
     
    FreshAir likes this.
  10. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    9,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Isn't that how Rudy was almost killed?
     
    FreshAir likes this.
  11. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,683
    Likes Received:
    25,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dazzle us with your brilliance Prof. :)
     
  12. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,329
    Likes Received:
    63,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2022
  13. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,651
    Likes Received:
    7,523
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why do you think it is "fake", and why is lack of cross-examination a problem to you? Cross-examination is for court trials.
     
  14. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,683
    Likes Received:
    25,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Start here:

    1. Release all the images of rioters pulling bicycle racks away from the police with name tags over each face revealing their identity.

    That should have been done within the first week.
     
  15. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,451
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How could you conceive of anyone trusting the outcome of hearing that doesn't question the validity of testimony and allows hearsay testimony as evidence?
    What If Trump held a committee hearing and only invited people who would testify on his behalf?
    And when you heard someone claim something you know isn't true, then read it in the media, what would be your reaction?

    This isn't a committee hearing. Its a leftist pep rally. Once they allowed Hutchinson to provide her hearsay testimony, then the Secret service says it isn't true and ask to testify under oath, but the committee members don't allow them to testify, nothing else coming out of the hearings will be listened too by most.

    Any hearing without cross examination which allows hearsay testimony, loses any credibility they might have provided.
    If you have a hearing without credibility, all you have done is distance yourself from reasonable people.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  16. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,874
    Likes Received:
    32,595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Big Deal...:bored:
    1) It ISN'T a Court of Law
    2) McCarthy dropped the ball
    3) Elections have consequences, Deal with it!
    "Leftist Pep Rally"?:roflol:
    Poor Lil' Baby Don...
    [​IMG]
     
    FreshAir likes this.
  17. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,651
    Likes Received:
    7,523
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You don't seem to understand what the Committee is doing. "Trusting the outcome" is of no effect on anyone but you don't understand why it seems.

    If Trump held a committee hearing and invited only Democrats according to a rational plan and system, I can't imagine having a problem with it. The Jan 6 Committee is not "only inviting people who would testify on behalf" of Democrats. EVERY PERSON WHO TESTIFIED was from Trump's hand-picked trusted aides, allies, attorneys, and others from Trump's "team". Can you name one who doesn't fit that description?

    I guess I'd say "typical bullshit". But I wouldn't consider it of any significance because of what this committee is doing and what its goal is.

    On what BS basis do you say that? What are your specific objections?

    What action do you think will come of Hutchinson.s testimony? Why are you so angry about it?

    This hearing is a committee inquiry. It's not a court trial and there will be no "convictions" coming out of it. Again, you don't seem to know what it's about!
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  18. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    9,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice job of posting reality.
     
    Kode likes this.
  19. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,683
    Likes Received:
    25,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, the committee is holding another political show trial/witch hunt.
    Odd given how ineffective political show trials have been since Joe McCarthy. They empower opposition. Which is probably why Trump never considered holding Fake Show Trials to persecute his opposition -- too stupid -- too ineffective.

    Our corrupt bipartisan ruling political class needs to find better strategists stat.
    Election Is Coming.
     
  20. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    9,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope, he doesn't grasp what the committee is doing.
     
  21. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,683
    Likes Received:
    25,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What do you think it is doing?
     
  22. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    28,050
    Likes Received:
    21,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Its sadface that you've accepted such awful propaganda...
     
    Ddyad likes this.

Share This Page