How exactly does one rebut a claim? By making more claims? In that case I have. I claim your source is garbage. EVIDENCE is needed, & there's no There -- there... At least not yet.
Why do you keep refusing to show us any evidence thank links Trump to Russia and the election? If you're making the claim, show us the facts. The burden of proof lies on the accuser.
Here we go again. Another one who has already put his or her foot in his or her mouth on the first round. Lol! Jeremy Bash brought up violating the "rule of law". See how lost you already are? You people are a trip. I love all this. Because for one, you folks are totally defenseless to argue the points of almost every argument out there, and when a so called attempt is made, you all either don't know what the argument is, or you all try and pivot to some other topic to escape what you know you already have no argument for. It's hilarious, yet sad.
Why would you bring up Brian Williams? Are you not aware of the lies he got caught telling? His whoppers are almost as big as Hillary's. At least he didn't get caught rigging an election. lol msnbc.... lolololololol
The problem is, & I'm sure you'll miss it.... Again.... That whatever claims that are made by ANYONE through a BIASED outlet, are defecto BIASED CLAIMS, worthy of a second flush only.
The link is actually part of liberal chain letter, and apparently one or more persons failed to forward the letter resulting in Hillary's crushing defeat. Nothing else seems to explain how else she actually lost the election, oh wait the RUSSIANS did it! Do liberals really think that doesn't sound totally lame? All this according to organizations that couldn't even see the Berlin Wall coming down until they were hit by the bricks. Yeah, no reason for skepticism...
That is not the argument you and I were having. Remember? You are retreating once again to another topic because you have nothing for the first. I've already posted about collusion in another post. I'm not going over that again for your convenience. For my convenience, you can't even engage our first argument. And you won't because you can't.
You can test that theory by engaging the material head on. If you don't it's only worthless gibberish on your part. As a matter of fact, that's all it will ever be. As long as you go down this dead end road of attacking the messenger instead of proving the message wrong, you will never debate anything or anyone. You would serve yourself and your time better if you went outside and picked up sticks.
I think he's trolling the news media, and the democrats, but I repeat myself. And they are falling for it hook, line, and sinker (as usual)
I flush turds. I don't grab them up & study them. There's nothing worth engaging. A biased claim is biased. There. Engaged.
I had really hoped Trump would address foreign outsourcing and bring the jobs back to America, that was his only positive, but seems he just can't do anything right
I can swear I watched the MSM questioning Lavrov live on FNC this morning. President Trump wasn't present because Lavrov isn't a head of state. (President, Prime Minister, a monarch.) Now if it were the Russian head of state President Vladimir Vladimir Putin who met with President Trump today you would have seen the traditional news conference being held at the White House any time a foreign head of state meets with the POTUS. So what we have here is more fake news from the left.
Thanks, you proved my point. You don't have the stomach or the documented material to mount a challenge to the claims Bash made. Once again, another one who just comes on here to waste everyone's time saying nothing. See you later.
The new GOP knows that this election was their last chance at power in the WH......now they will do whatever to keep it. Even soil the constitution.
To hell with the rest of the world. I'm concerned about what he's doing inside our borders. The pipeline, coal, global warming, taxes, the wall are just a few more things that donald is screwing up while driving us back into the dark ages..
LOL, how the tune turns. Last time it was the Republicans will never hold the WH again. Wonder if you guys ever listen to what you say or maybe, like Hillary, you don't remember what you say.
Trump is not a real republican, so your point lacks thought. Trump is a democrat that understands the dog whistles that the far right salivate to.
You mean like Bill Clinton was not a real democrat? I think thought has left the democratic party some time ago.