Trump demands Georgia elections official overturn his defeat in hourlong call

No....he has had no policies. I said it correctly.

 

There's a difference between lazy and wasting time.

 

I realize that, you were trying to engage someone that I have a one response limit for who is unclear on the subject and he had taken something I had out of context to you.

 

It was made up by the left! You think that "squad" is a negative word? The media constantly refers to "the squad!"

When did I claim that they were the mainstream? It's simple - you tried to claim that only the Republicans talk about socialism and I called you out on it.

 

So it's intellectual laziness, but you don't have a problem with it?

So a source being named doesn't make a story more trustworthy?

 

Hoosier. Thank you for sowing enough distrust in the GA elections that it in part helped the Dems to flip the senate.

Of course it was not you alone, it was also Trump and the rest of the online Trump army that helped spread this message, reducing (R) turnout. THANK you for doing your part.

 

Why won't you get a check?

 

It's a waste of time to construct your OWN argument?

 

So the Republicans haven't introduced one single policy since Trump took office?

 

Depends what you mean by "problem." By "problem", do you meant "not fit for office?"

I'm trying to determine your line. I'm sure that if Trump said the below, it would have been NO worse than what he actually said!

Hey Brad, I want to overturn this election. I want 11,780 votes to be manufactured for me so that I win!

 

No what?

 

No, I'm simply using your standard, that not knowing that something is "humiliating and embarrassing" makes someone "unfit for office!"

 

I won't, either.

It's a good thing. People who don't need the money shouldn't get a check.

 

So the CRIMES have to "get to the courts first" before they are deemed CRIMES? Are you listening to yourself?

 

What makes you ineligible?

 

It's very simple. It cannot be said that the majority leader has more power than the president. Simple.

 

It has nothing to do with argument from authority! We're not talking about people in authority!

 

Yes, I understand all of that, but then what do you think Trump meant by "FIND?"
I can only makes sense of it if he was talking about finding 11,780 votes for him, which he thinks have been illegally discarded or something.

 

I think that you know better than that.

 

Yeah, sure, whatever you say!

 

not everyone gets a check

just because I don't get one, doesn't mean I do not think many do need it

 

Nope.
Convince the forum.

 

Income. Just like the first relief payment if your income was too high you would not receive one. I am not sure of the exact number but I know for a couple if your combined income exceeds 200K you won't get one. The exact number is smaller but 200K is a good ballpark. The number of children makes a difference too.

 

I don't understand. Someone on 200K could have lost their job due to COVID just as easily as someone on 50K.

 

Defending that he committed a crime, yes. That doesn't mean that I think it's a good thing to be deluded.