There use to be a website called Bushlies.net, where the author chronicled the daily lies, distortions and half-truths that emanated from the G.W. Bush White House, and placed them against the FACTS documented from valid sources. I suggest that such a site is needed for the current occupant of the White House. Case in point, this latest whopper: Trump’s Lies About Abortion Keep Getting More Disturbing https://www.thecut.com/2019/04/trumps-lies-about-abortion-keep-getting-more-disturbing.html Now this was covered by the MSM, but got nowhere near the sensational coverage that the Orange Oaf usually gets (IMHO, of course). I swear, if the Dem candidate (whomever that will be) can't beat this clown next year, then the entire Dem Party needs to disband and leave it to the socialist democrats and progressives to give this country some hope.
Democrats pro-infanticide stance (neo-naticide specifically) is a liability for democrats. Also, how's Ruth?
Sorry, but the silly right wing neologisms don't cut it when you can't logically and factually prove it. Trump LIED here....that is a matter of history, a matter of fact. You don't like abortion....NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO HAVE ONE....and YOU CAN'T FORCE SOMEONE TO BRING AN UNWANTED PREGNANCY TO TERM. Choice...America's main stay. Don't know a Ruth....care to elaborate?
I seem to remember the Virginia governor point blank say he and the mother made a decision after the BABY was born, so who is lying? Most are against late term abortions, it shows up in most polls.
It is disturbing and alarming how people actually believe and cheer these wild lies of his. Dictators rise to power this way, telling vile, popular lies about minorities and political opponents. The dictators' followers also become more extreme and violent in response to these lies. We have already seen Trump-inspired acts of hate and terrorism. I fear these may get worse as his lies get worse and he expands his target group.
Incorrect. This is not the first time Trump has made such an outlandish claim: Back in February, he launched a similar attack on Virginia governor Ralph Northam, a pediatric neurologist by trade, after comments he made about third-trimester abortions “done in cases where there may be severe deformities” or where the fetus is not viable were misconstrued by Republicans. Here, Trump employed the same aggressive language of “executing babies” once they’d been born and wrapped in a blanket — a startling escalation from his false insistence on the campaign trail that Democrats wanted to make it legal to “take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby.” https://www.thecut.com/2019/04/trumps-lies-about-abortion-keep-getting-more-disturbing.html
It's correct. Our racist governor, "Coonman" Northam (D-VA), talked about killing an infant after it was delivered and outside the womb.
Drama queen much, hell we've seen hate on all sides stop with the BS. Now that being said since it's a lie the Virginia Governor and Trump is telling, do you support legislation preventing these lye's?
I guess it depends on what the meaning of "and then the mother and the physician will make a decision on what to do" means.
But when Trump talks about this, the dems scream LIES!!! LOL The democratic party doesn't know which way to turn, so everything is a racist and a lie.
Jesus the guy point blank said it in the link and you're POINT BLANK being dishonest, color me shocked.
The republicans are for healthcare reform just not medicare crap for all, we don't want to take the health our of healthcare you know? Also the $15 per may sound great for the cart attendant at the grocery store until they lose their job because the minimum wage got increased. If someone can't get a $15/hour job in this economy then they don't want to work.
Ruth is a judge. Under the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002, a woman who gives childbirth after an attempted abortion is the mother of a born-alive infant if the infant is observed with any of the following signs of life: breathing, heartbeat, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or confirmed voluntary muscle movement, regardless of the gestational age of the child. Although medical guidelines recommend withholding resuscitation for infants with practically no chance of surviving, and allow parental discretion if the chance of survival is marginal, any child that has a better-than-marginal chance of survival who is allowed to die would be considered the victim of infanticide or neonaticide.[10][11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neonaticide#United_States