Trumpets call and big guns roar: US military action against Syria imminent

Arms Flow to Syria May Be Behind Benghazi Cover-Up

The Benghazi Attack and CIA Arms to Syria

US smuggling weapons to Syrian rebels: The real Benghazi story

 

I googled it also...

Reports that Assad Lives on Russian Warship Likely False
There is little incentive for the Syrian president to flee his country yet, experts say

Saudi Arabian news service al-Watan issued unconfirmed reports that family and senior advisors of Bashar al-Assad have joined the president on board a warship in the Mediterranean, secured by Russian operatives. Assad uses a helicopters to travel to Syria, reports al-Watan. This story has been re-reported by Israel's Y Net News, Business Insider, and UPI, all citing the same unconfirmed source.


http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...t-assad-lives-on-russian-warship-likely-false
"Unconfirmed source". Which is why I asked you for credible links; NOT THE DAILY MAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

There are hundreds of sources, you said you googled it, so you know its true.

You asked for 1 source, I gave you 3 from 3 different countries, and none are US news outlets.

Do you think India is lying too?

Do you think Saudi is lying too?

Do you think England is lying too?

I dont think any of them are lying, and it makes perfect sense, because syria is vital to Russias national security.

 

Huh? You've forgotten his war for oil in Libya already??????

 

But no one's government is saying it! India, Saudi and England have said nothing. It's in Saudi's best interests to undermine Assad, so the rumour (and make no mistake, it is a rumour), helps Saudi.

I asked for a credible source, you gave none! And lets not forget the context of this! Your premise is that Israel have used chemical weapons in Syria, to dupe the US into a conflict there. You've proven nothing, other than you live in a world of dilusion.

- - - Updated - - -

There was no US war in Lybia in the first place buddy.

 

The rebels used the chems to bait the west into action so they can overthrow the government and install an oppressive Islamic regime with Obama's help. Just like Egypt and Libya. Obama and the western countries are puppets of radical Islam now. They are helping these nuts create and establish their caliphate in return for help in toppling capitalism and Christianity. The US even gave the rebels the chems through Libya. That's why the huge cover up in Benghazi.

- - - Updated - - -

Chemical weapons were among those too. The US gave the chems to the rebels to set up the Assad regime so we can get into the fray and help radical Islam take over. It's been Obama's mission since his birth.

 

Please provide a listing of sources you deem "credible". Thanks

- - - Updated - - -

Id have to see proof the US gave them chemical weapons.

There was no sarin gas used in Libya, that I know of.

 

Not used, but went MISSING. Where do you think it all ended up? WE GAVE IT TO THEM! What do you think the giant coverup is all about in Benghazi?

http://rt.com/news/syria-chemical-weapons-plot-532/

- - - Updated - - -

Do honestly think you'd see proof that we gave them to them? REALLY???????????

 

http://larouchepac.com/node/27875

Flashback: Hacked Emails Reveal ‘Washington-Approved’ Plan to Stage Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria

Cached Copy of Scrubbed Article Confirming US and UK Backed Chemical Weapons in Syria

Syrian Rebels Now Have Chemical Weapons

Rebels preparing to smuggle chemical weapons from Libya into Syria via Turkey

 

I dont believe any of that.

Sarin isnt that complicated to create. Some japanese psycho terrorists used it in japan, and they made it themselves.

gaddafi gave up all his wmd's so he could get contracts with BP, while Bush was still president.

Ive seen nothing that would suggest America gave terrorists sarin gas to use in libya.

 

Of course you didn't see any indication of that. Who's going to tell you? LMAO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vet0PV-XPlw

- - - Updated - - -

So you too just believe that Assad used them with NO supporting evidence? Just a guess? come on dude don't make me laugh more than I already am. Why was there NO test on the chemicals to determine who it was? Why not? You SHOULD know why not, it's a false flag for sure.

 

Looks like the same type of false flag was done in Kosovo too

Peace researcher: Common to provoke NATO interventions by false flags

 

A confirmed source, not an unconfirmed source.

 

no, I dont believe that assad used them, the last thing he wants is the US more involved than they already are. Assad is winning, without chemical weapons. using them would be a stupid move.

- - - Updated - - -

wtf I gave you freakn 3, and there are hundreds on google.

 

This is what I said in response earlier...

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...t-assad-lives-on-russian-warship-likely-false

None, NONE of your sources are confirmed, NONE of them!

 

Syrian president Bashar Assad and his family are living on a warship guarded by the Russian navy, it has been claimed.

sources told a Saudi newspaper.

sources told the Saudi daily paper al-Watan the president was being protected by Russia, which effectively amounted to political asylum, The Times of Israel has reported.

Al-Watan was told Assad’s fear of advances by the opposition in the capital was one of the reasons why he has moved to the ship, the Daily Mail reports.


Leffe± All these stories come back to the Saudi report and yes, it´s in the Saudi´s best interests to remove Assad.

Again...... all the reports come back to the same Saudi newspaper.... you know, the Saudi dictatorship.

 

neither is a bullet to the head, but where is the outcry over that?

- - - Updated - - -

I understand that. Totally. However bombing and shooting innocent people is inhumane also.

 

Breaking news!!!

Chris Matthews and and guests are chanting " no blood for oil, no blood for oil" on MSNBC.


Oops sorry, it was a rerun.

 

No we were saying you shouldnt say youre going to do something when you dont follow through. The first time he did that he lost credibility on the world stage and that is not good for the U.S. As I predicted, he would be doing this to draw attention away from his failed economy and his multiple scandals.

Now onto the delicious hypocrisy we are about to see. If Obama bombs another nation without any evidence or U.N approval I cant wait to see you lefties prove a decades worth of Bush War bashing completely false. Please pretty please defend Obama on this.

 

More right wing fantasy.

 

Which part, the fact that Obama lost credibility, the fact that I predicted he would bomb to draw attention away from his scandals or the fact that lefties spent a decade bashing bush for the exact same thing their hero is about to do?

 

Everything you people spout.

 

but you cant be specific correct?

 

I think they're speechless at the moment. Probably rummaging through closets looking for some old rumpled flags that survived the burning of the last war so they can wave them proudly now. Gotta feel a little sorry for em no?