TRUMPONOMICS: Tax Revenues Up Big After GOP Tax Cut

First you don't know math and now you don't know the difference between a democracy and a Democratic Republic. And some people still try to say our public schools are doing a good job.

 

well of course I will, as that is a demonstrably factual statement.

actually we lost the white house because the EC selected trump. The American people chose Clinton.

 

notice you couldn't actually contradict a single thing I said.

And I don't know basic math? I've been pounding you over the head with it for 3 pages now. Lol

 

Did you also love the Reagan tax increases the next six years?

 

So $49.1 billion of that $50.5 billion increase was from revenue BEFORE Tramp tax cuts went into effect.

 

Reagan raised taxes by the largest amount to date...

 

Because it is a 1.5 trillion gift to the rich at precisely the time that the US government should be trying to prepare for the next recession.

 

Reagonomics also involved one of the biggest tax increases to date.

 

Not true, of course, the CBO actually said the first quarter of FISCAL 2018, Tramp's tax cuts didn't go into effect until Q2 of fiscal 2018 and produced a surplus of only $1.4 billion, (a 0.6% increase over same quarter last fiscal year), of the $50.5 billion surplus for FISCAL 2018.

 

Well, Clintons people were all huddled together in certain areas. (hint: blue)

 

yes, trump won the majority of wide open unpopulated space. He lost among actual voters though. By millions of votes.

 

You want to talk upswing talk change over time. Averages do not tell you much.

 

So the red is all wide open unpopulated space? You should get out more.

 

Granted a 1.9 average growth rate is nothing to write home about but it is a growth not a contraction. For Trumpeizdas you are logic and math deficient a contraction is a minus firgure.

 

mostly.

 

Americans are embarrassed for those saying GDP under Trump is higher than the last two years of Obama's term of office.

Any who keep insisting that are laughed at.

 

I'm still trying to figure out if the righties are this easily fooled or if they think the rest of us are.

Using Feb. and March as a comparison (the only months the tax cuts effect) revenues are down 21.9 billion.
The second thing you want us to forget is that without tax cuts revenue would have gone up, just like it almost always does, due to wage increases and population growth. The historical averge is about 4.5% and is supported by the following data.
So by doing nothing revenue should have gone up 17.5 billion - but it did not. It went down 21.9 billion for a difference of 38.4 billion or 230 billion a year.


https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/rpt/mthTreasStmt/current.htm

 

Your basic math seems to be if a person flips burgers for eight years for minimum wage their economic position is in an upswng because they had zero wages before that. Excellent example of the liberal mindset.

 

yes, working and earning a paycheck means you have more money than if you didn't work and earn a paycheck. You are starting to grasp basic concepts. When you've gotten those down, I will continue your schooling in more complex matters.

 

Eight years of 1.9% average GDP is no change over time. It's stagnation.

 

Wow. Quit while you're behind.

 

are you another one who doesn't understand basic math?

 

I understand what a steady upswing means. You apparently don't.

 

then you understand that anything above 0, year over year, is a steady upswing right? It is not stagnate, or declining.

 

mathematically incorrect.