Trump's "ungrateful black player" is the new N word

Will the blacks admire Kaepernick if he were to kneel when at a pals wedding, they play Here comes the bride?

To the thick skulls excusing Colin for what he did, he did it to the game of football. He diminishes in the eyes of the blacks the battle vs England at Baltimore that caused the anthem to be our song.

Colin graduated from a university. Apparently he never was taught American history and by the looks of the black kneelers, they don't know our history at all either.

 

He has not said one bad thing about the son. Mr. Big mouth dad has made it all about him the father. Can't stand his son being freed with Trump assisting his son. As to your claims over Goldman Sachs, no doubt you read that on a cereal box and believe it.

 

I've always found it highlariously funny when folks soil themselves over black people asserting the same rights whites have.

 

You mean when they axe like da White folk do?

 

All you have to do is look back over your administrations to see that Goldman Sachs is a constant presence in the white house utterly regardless of electoral outcomes. Your lack of due diligence is stunning to say the very least if you are ignorant of that fact.

 

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzactly.

 

I once had seasons tickets to a pro team's games. I do not recall when whites took a knee to protest the national anthem and i saw some of the great football players play the game. I am angry that it was on the 49ers this crap got started. And glad the perpetrator is gone from the team.

To the nitwit blacks. Notice that what you think a knee was taken over is not the anthem, but why you dung beatles take a knee as you collect millions of dollars to play a sports game. (I do not think most blacks agree with the nitwits)

 

What does the one statement have to do with the other? Jeeezus!
What passes for "commentary" here is disgracefully ignorant drivel.

 

Frankly, I don't accept your claim in the first place and in the second place we must have financial experts assisting any president so if it is Goldman Sachs, I am grateful.

 

Many whites have no real issue with "the law" gunning down fellow citizens in the streets, even when unarmed, with impunity, if of course those fellow citizens are of "another" group. And I rather doubt you speak for black folk.

 

White fools get shot too.

 

I get to tell you! Since there is no shortage of media coverage, choosing to push their message during the anthem shows an extreme level of disrespect. They can claim otherwise, but I don't have to buy it. While abuse of power by law enforcement is an important issue, they only oppose it when it happens to black people. Their message is racist and their timing is disrespectful.

 

Blacks need to get educated in law. They have exactly the same rights as all others have. There are no special rights for whites. Factually, as landlords, when a black tenant moves in, you are positive when the home is vacant again to see a lot of damage to the home and the tenant gone like a shadow who never existed. Courts often favor the black family who did enormous damage.

 

Well we do worship the aristocracy in america and we subsidize them and their lobbying efforts. This is how you came to bail out Wall Street.

So you do not think Don should have "drained the swamp"? Not to worry, he went nowhere near that, it was all just more of his pathological habitual sodomization of truth.

https://www.propublica.org/article/...rules-let-lobbyist-help-run-agency-he-lobbied


https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/...s-now-theyre-on-his-transition-team.html?_r=0


http://time.com/donald-trump-drain-swamp/


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...7d93165c6d4_story.html?utm_term=.c6f6ade76246


https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...ry-lobbyist-to-hud-transition-team-1480453288


https://theintercept.com/2017/01/27/coal-doj-trump/


http://fortune.com/2016/11/16/trump-lobbyists-dc-establishment/

But wait, there's more:

Another of Don’s Swamp Rats Bails …


... just before publication of this New Yorker article. Must be "fake".


Icahn’s role was novel. He would be an adviser with a formal title, but he would not receive a salary, and he would not be required to divest himself of any of his holdings, or to make any disclosures about potential conflicts of interest. “Carl Icahn will be advising the President in his individual capacity,” Trump’s transition team asserted.


In the months after the election, the stock price of CVR, Icahn’s refiner, nearly doubled—a surge that is difficult to explain without acknowledging the appointment of the company’s lead shareholder to a White House position. The rally meant a personal benefit for Icahn, at least on paper, of half a billion dollars. There was an expectation in the market—an expectation created, in part, by Icahn’s own remarks—that, with Trump in the White House and Icahn playing consigliere, the rules were about to change, and not just at the E.P.A. Icahn’s empire ranges across many economic sectors, from energy to pharmaceuticals to auto supplies to mining, and all of them are governed by the types of regulations about which he would now potentially be advising Trump.


Janet McCabe, who left the E.P.A. in January, and now works at the Environmental Law and Policy Center, told me, “I’m not naïve. People in business try to influence the government. But the job of the government is to serve the American people, not the specific business interests of the President’s friends. To think that you have somebody with that kind of agenda bending the President’s ear is troubling.”


Conflicts of interest have been a defining trait of the Trump Administration. The President has not only refused to release his tax returns; he has declined to divest from his companies, instead putting them in a trust managed by his children. Questions have emerged about the ongoing business ties of his daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, who, since Trump took office, have reaped nearly two hundred million dollars from the Trump hotel in Washington, D.C., and from other investments. Although Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” he has assembled a Cabinet of ultra-rich Americans, including two billionaires: Betsy DeVos, the Secretary of Education, and Wilbur Ross, the Secretary of Commerce.


But Icahn is worth more than the Trump family and all the members of the Cabinet combined—and, with no constraint on his license to counsel the President on regulations that might help his businesses, he was poised to become much richer. Robert Weissman, who runs the watchdog group Public Citizen, told me, “This kind of self-enrichment and influence over decision-making by an individual mogul who is simultaneously inside and outside the Administration is unprecedented. In terms of corruption, there’s nothing like it. Maybe ever.” In conversations with me, financiers who have worked with Icahn described his appointment as a kind of corporate raid on Washington. One said, “It’s the cheapest takeover Carl’s ever done.”


http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/28/carl-icahns-failed-raid-on-washington

 

Bwa ha ha ha ha, yeah, you are as unaware of your legal system as you are of your white house swamp my friend.

 

I always want me and my fellow citizens to be armed. This way the cops showing up late won't need to shoot down anybody. Now, in white areas, the need for a firearm virtually vanishes.

 

Love to see your list of unarmed whites gunned down by your "law".

 

You live in a perceptual reality that bears no resemblance to objective reality my friend. You have firearms all over the place, claim you need more, all while claiming there is no need in "white" areas. Dizzy yet?

 

That is the old when you can't dazzle me with brilliance, serve up a helping of bullshit.

I hate to seem rude. i am not a rude man. I get sick of Democrats propaganda.

When Goldman Sachs was deep in the Obama team, no problem.

In comes Trump and suddenly a huge problem.

I honestly do not care about the mans former employer nearly as much as much as i care what goes on that matters inside the admin.

I know the reasons for the crash during Bush. I have been in this field since 1971. The problems that forced a crash were not Bush's fault. I don't want to waste more posting time on some explanation since I have done this dozens of times to a deaf mind.

Do you take your loyalty to a past company with you to the new company? If so, you are not too swift.

 

That's because in the hearts of white liberals, blacks ARE n*****s.

 

No, i have been around so long that I was alive prior to the moon landing. Matter of fact, as a kid, my president was Roosevelt. So i saw all this propaganda all of my life.
I have plenty of arms. And bullets. But here in my white CA city, this is no problem. We have a very safe city.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2017/

21 unarmed whites got shot by the police in 2017, against 15 unarmed blacks.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

22 unarmed whites, against 16 unarmed blacks.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/

29 whites with toy guns were shot in 2015, against 6 blacks with toy guns.

Police killings are not a race issue. Police brutality is definitely a thing, but I've yet to see "racist police brutality".

 

Well now we know your issue is blacks. Good luck with that issue.

 

Drain the swamp pard, your entire system is utterly corrupt.

"When Goldman Sachs was deep in the Obama team, no problem."

Nope, what I said was, "same as it ever was", "regardless of electoral outcomes". YOU need me to be ok with it under Obama. And ya know what else pard? Woulda been the same shyte under Hillary, Bill actively courted the shyte.

 

You are engaging in a racist anti white rant