Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it's that simple

Tucker Carlson:

1.Carlson is usually very accurate with respect to the facts he reports.
2. Carlson is also rather selective with respect to the facts he chooses to report.
3. The DP/Left threatened his family, and Carlson has apparently decided to inflict as much damage on his virulent enemies as possible.
4. Carlson uses the carefully slanted truth very effectively.
5. Hence the effort to have Carlson "cancelled".

 

Tell me you're not trying to make me hurl.

 

HAHAHAHA! Thank you!

 

The Border problems are due to Biden. Feel free to support or reject Biden as to his illegal actions against this country.

Do you support Biden's illegal acts or not?

 

You guys hate him because he is mostly right and don't want to hear it. Here, watch what he says about a new bill your idiot Liberals want to pass. The most stupid bill I have ever heard of. Now if you think Carlson is wrong, Go to your search engine and post the name of the bill and read it for yourself and see if Carlson isn't right. (New Way Forward Act)

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuc...under-bill-aoc-and-other-house-democrats-back

 

According to forum rules I must obey thread creation rules. Got it?
This is only discussing Carlson for his calling Biden out for Biden's illegal acts. I asked if you support Biden's acts. That is the question framed by me, the author. It is not about Tucker since Tucker has no charge of our Borders.
Thanks all Democrats who stick to the topic, Biden.

 

Please link me to the illegal acts since a POTUS is above the law? Please also link me to the court cases that prove these illegalities? Many thanks.
Oh, and this is the last thread bump for your OP, I have things to attend to !

 

The Bidens may have even surpassed The Clintons as the most successful crooked political familiy in US history.

"This was the transfer of Burisma Group's funds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

He also publicized sums that were transferred to Burisma Group representatives, in particular Hunter Biden, a son of the former U.S. vice president."
Interfax-Ukraine, Burisma paid Joe Biden $900,000 for lobbying – Ukrainian MP, Press Conference, October 10, 2019.
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/617936.html

But Bill Clinton, unlike Joe Biden, will be remembered as a rather effective President.

 

Yeah, it is hard to see the truth for what it is. Tucker shilling his act and the victims whining and buying it.

 

The rather obvious facts:

1. The border crossings were under control by the end of the Trump presidency.
2. The Biden administration effectively opened the border to illegal aliens.

 

Your very welcome!

Every critical thinker should watch Tucker's show.
It is always very informative.

 

As Tucker says, the MSM has not touched this proposed law. And of course it in no way favors citizens. It really is like a bill of rights for MS13 gangs. It protects them and not you or me.

 

PolitiFacts has not one time called me a liar. They have called Biden one 137 times so far since he has been president.

 

Biden is above the law? My god. Did you really say that? Why then did Biden take an oath to uphold the Constitution and our laws?

 

You are protected under our Bill of Rights. Right now, the Democrats are creating a Bill of Rights for illegal aliens.
Tell me why you are pleased?

For instance. You commit a crime. This system jails you and tells you if you get bail or not.
Illegals will not have that rule. They must be automatically released for crimes they commit.

 

Biden has been a very effective criminal.

 

That would be less troubling if he was also an effective president.

IMO, there is something seriously wrong with Biden that has nothing to do with partisan politics.

"Well, I think, first of all, there is an awareness that the threat of retaliation is increased because of the action against bin Laden. I think that there has been great — ” and then he stopped, wondering if he should continue down this path.

Then he resumed: “Frankly, a week ago Sunday, in the Situation Room, we all agreed that we would not release any operational details from the effort to take out bin Laden. That all fell apart on Monday — the next day.”

That’s a pretty amazing statement. Here you have the nation’s warlord calling out his senior colleagues inside the Obama Administration for spilling the beans. Although he didn’t name names, there was ire inside the Pentagon at White House homeland security chief’s John Brennan’s Monday on-the-record briefing, which offered far more detail than a background session conducted the same day at the Pentagon. Brennan spoke in front of cameras about bin Laden being protected by female human shields, and implied he was armed — both of which had to be retracted as untrue the next day (the very act of retraction means the speaker had drifted into discussing operational details that had to be…retracted).

At least they can keep their lips zipped at the Pentagon: during that Defense Department confab with reporters, one asked

Can you confirm that it was a SEAL team?

…to which the senior defense official, who under the ground rules of the briefing cannot be further identified, responded:

Not going to comment on units or numbers.

How tough was that? Apparently too tough for two of the nation’s top leaders. Later the same day, May 3, Vice President Joe Biden let the cat out of the bag. While the press had been reporting SEAL Team 6 carried out the mission, no one in government had confirmed that fact."
TIME MAGAZINE, TERRORISM, The Outing of the SEALs Has SecDef Ticked Off, By Mark Thompson, May 13, 2011.
https://nation.time.com/2011/05/13/the-outing-of-the-seals-has-secdef-ticked-off/

 

Biden sucks at being president. However he has been an effective criminal. He sucked at being VP so why would he improve one rank higher?

 

It's not like we don't have enough criminals in this country and the Democrats are already protecting the ones already here with their stupid (sanctuary) that most Liberal states have adopted. Now they want to bring these criminals we deported for crimes committed back and pay to bring them back. How stupid is that? Look at these people and the things they want. Who in their right mind thinks this is still the Party of our fathers? These people are literately out of their freaked mind.

 

Well, you gotta have hope.

 

Imagine we put them into our Army and Navy and made them pilots? Democrats I believe would approve that too.

 

And what does that prove?

 

You might actually learn something. Quick, hide under the covers!

 

I get my news from news people not entertainers.

https://www.quora.com/Is-Tucker-Carlson-an-entertainer-or-a-journalist

 

Name these laws.