Tucker Carlson: Diveristy Makes Us Weaker -- Is He Right??

The few white nationalists who still exist are of zero interest to me. My issues are with the MUCH LARGER number of racist Leftists, who are obsessed with Identity Politics.

 

They don't. They oppose CULTURAL diversity.

 

Amen, well said!

 

Hitler merely needed an Army Group in reserve to accomplish his objectives on the Eastern Front. Diversity would have ensured one was available.

 

Ron, I believe you are aware that the majority of Conservatives judge others on the content of their character. They basically operate via the merit system. If you earn their respect, you'll receive it. Yet the majority of self described Liberals ignore character, and focus on trivialities like race and ethnicity.

 

Respect is earned, not given out as freebies.

 

Its full of folks saying be American, or get off my lawn.

Get off my lawn.

 

diversity happens regardless its Nither a strength or a weakness its a natural phenomenon.

I think Tucker should have gone after multiculturalism. That is not just a weakness its destruction.

 

Meh. Tucker sucks. He is a bad host that badgers his guests and talks over people incessantly.

Total ****ing ******bag hack.

 

I have brought this up many times. Without assimilation, diversity leads to Balkanization and civil war. Take the Roman Empire and why it fell.

 

Actually he is an excellent host. He points out where he agrees with his guess but doesn't allow them to promote as fact things that are merely their "bias".

 

You don't like him because he can articulate his case and he is right. And apparently, you have to attack the person because you yourself cannot articulate a failed position. Those that come on the program know what they are in for, a brutal run at the truth. No BS zone to cut to the chase. He wins because he is right, and speaks the truth, and has the material down pat.

 

I tend to think anyone who constantly cuts people off and mocks them incessantly to score political points is a bad host.

 

Exceptionally great post. I grew up during that era. I am racially diverse. I never had any big issues.

 

He isn't right. He is wrong about democratic socialism, and he was also lying about Avenatti. "We won't use that name!" Queue "creepy porn lawyer" being bannered across the bottom rocker for the entire interview.

He doesn't win. He bullies, brow beats and strong arms.

A brutal run at the truth? You must be joking.

Tucker is a sell out shill and a partisan who interrupts and talks over his guests like a bullying teenager at their first debate prep.

Truth my ****ing ass.

 

It is called debating. these people come on with ideas that make Art Bell look sane, and he rips them apart because their ideas and story are so full of holes that it doesn't hold water. You just don't like him because he is RIGHT, and knows how to debate at the top of the pile because he does his research and catches the bullshit that many of the guests make up or try to slide by that works on CNN, but not on FOX.

 

It's not debating if you refuse to allow people to speak and constantly interject. A debate is a formal discussion of times commentary and timed rebuttals. What Tucker and Fox and Madcow and CNN do is not debate. It is brow beating.

Debate at the top of the pile? I would demolish Tucker in a formal debate, because he spews nothing but unsupported agitprop bs to reaffirm the partisan divide and to engage cognitive dissonance, and you have -swallowed it hook line and sinker.-

 

That is because the courts are rewriting the constitution. If I don't want to bake a cake for a couple of gays, I don't have to. The courts ignore the 13th amendment against "involuntary servitude" because it guts all this crap like discrimination in housing. The government also violates the 10th amendment too AS WRITTEN. The problem with the courts is they want a certain outcome rather than follow the letter of the constitution, and use reverse engineering to get there. The 10 amendment strips this BS right out of the laws. It is social rather than legal, and that is the way to hell to do this, and we are getting there on the express train.

 

He would rip you a new one. You can't even hold a debate here, let alone with someone with skills. You think of formal debate like in school, real life debate is not like that. It is brutal, and if you have crazy ideas like you have, you get ripped apart.

 

Who " he " be. ?
If you mean Tucker.He has years of practice.He took over - Crossfire -
at CNN after the Great Pat Buchanan decided to move on.
Plus Tucker had a hour long show at MSNBC { 11 pm } - Tucker -.
in the mid 2000's { 2005-2008 }.It was on that Tucker show where
Rachel Maddow got her TV start.She played the Devils advocate to
Tucker's prudent inquisidor.

 

Tucker couldn't shout me down. I'd demolish him.

Real life debates -are like that- when they are INTELLECTUAL debates.

Go watch some formal debates and report back to me.

What we have isn't debate - it's ARGUMENT.

 

really sad how Conservatives keep bashing racial and ethnic diversity.

 

Did any of this stop all of a sudden?

And for the record, Tucker Carlson is one of the last people I will heed any attention or take advice from in regards to race. Or anyone on FOX in general.

 

Actually the Roman Empire fell for a lot of reasons: poor economics, stretching too far too thinly, barbarian invasions, corruption, etc.

 

Can the majority of conservatives also cut the bullshit and learn to recite other MLK quotes instead of that cherrypicked one that makes them feel good?