From an objective standpoint, it is NOT evidence of collusion. He had his people having meetings with people from all over the world, do you equally think thats evidence he was colluding with people all over the world? Its astoundingly dishonest to pretend that a meeting = collusion. But thats the modern day dems for ya when it comes to Trump. Not an ounce of honesty. Nonetheless, I have proven myself objectively correct, again.
Never once changed the context nor could you even begin to support such a claim. Like I said, there is literally zero evidence Trump colluded with russia. Yet, dems believed it. I think its because dem are more emotional in their thinking, but just my theory.
You are wasting my time while you refuse to accept the Republican and USA intelligence services findings.
You are wasting your own time, they did not find evidence of collusion. This is objectively true regardless of how you choose to “feel” about it. Why you supplied as “evidence” was in fact not evidence of collusion nor was it ever claimed to be by any source. Your inability to see that is not my fault. So again, with literally zero evidence dems believed it because of emotions.
I would be embarressed if I acted in any way like Trump supporters reactions to reality of recorded history, let alone the day I meet my maker !!!!
I'm wondering when it's going to stop. They already look like kooks, and now Giuliani says he has evidence of a Venezuelan software company, with ties to China, that stole Trump's votes and sent them out of the country. Literally. Rudy made that statement. (But he can't show us the evidence quite yet. Smh) It's looking like rubber room time. Pretty scary.
50’s? I remember my mother doing it into the 70’s. They’ve been second class citizens for most of my lifetime. It’s a hoot watching her rebel now. A lot of change in her thinking over the years
Just pulled that out from somewhere... In the 50's, I suspect very few women were doing their own thing, while in the 70's it was turning around. My mom was what would be charitably described as a woman's libber most of her life... She would have sooner voted for Donald Trump before registering to vote or sign anything as Mrs Dad's Name... But she also would have fully supported anybody who did...
They aren't even going to try to prove anything. That isn't the point. All Trump wants to do is spread baseless allegation his cult followers can use to complain that the election was stolen. It's all nonsense, but that doesn't matter. Right-Wing Tactics 101: Step #1: Create nonsense claim Step #2: Get right-wing newspaper or website to write story with catchy headline Step #3: Gullible people spread the "news" and right-wing outlets force feed the nonsense to other gullible people Step #4: The "claim" is proven to be nonsense and nothing comes of it (i.e. no indictments, no arrests, no jury verdicts, etc.) Step #5: Gullible people forget about the nonsense story and the process starts at Step #1 again with a new nonsense claim