Tulsi Gabbard calls Hillary Clinton the ‘embodiment of corruption’

Which point of my post are you referring to? Obama's love for Russia, mocking the Republicans telling him Russia is a threat while he laughs?

Or are you referring to Hillary's need to ignite a cold war?

Be specific...

Starting to think the alt left desperate posters are confusing themselves again...

 

Because?

 

Two words - Election Meddling... Surely defending our election processes shouldn't cause a war, should it?

 

Is war with Russia your goal? I seem to remember you mocking that earlier.

If you want a war with Russia...just be upfront and say "We need to go to war with Russia".

No need to dance around it. What is your real view?

 

There was no election meddling. Hillary lost because she sucks. Trump won because millions of Americans wanted to give the political establishment the finger. It's really no more complicated than that.

 

Things change.... People change.....Do I really need to bring up Trump's statements on his tax returns at this point? That's usually a lot of fun....

She doesn't have to even be a declared 3rd party candidate to be used as such, although I'm not claiming she will be used as such...

 

My view is we should make sure our elections are 100% protected and enforce anything against Putin and the Russians if they try again...

Is that not yours??

You are the ones who throw the W word in there all the time... Not me...

 

And that ends our discussion for the evening.... have a good one...

 

Clinton represents big banking and big corporations and the elites that own them. She despises working americans . She is a neocon war monger and corrupt.

That makes her a moderate today.

Tulsi sure as hell would not endorse clinton. She even

What else can be noted about Clinton that has not already been noted?

One can only comment on the latest vile verbiage she spews.

 

Wow, very hawkish...calling for war with Russia. Definitely a Hillary supporter!

 

Go back in your shed.... You clearly haven't followed the entire thread.... just sad that you would be that obvious about it..

 

Specific? You’ve said nothing to support you claim that Hillary wants war lol

 

That's okay Ego...I'm not the one being obvious.

 

The Russian "meddling" narrative that you're attempting to peddle is a dogma, bordering on a religion, that we're all supposed to accept on pure faith. Apparently, it never crossed your mind for even one second that this dogma might be wrong. Because the vaunted "intelligence community" is always right, eh? They've never promoted information that was false or misleading or incomplete. Not even once!

 

No mystery, the progressive left hates her and they truly believe shes a conservative republican running as a democrat.
This is what happens when a democrat politician, is Patriotic, Intelligent and has common sense and common decency, Pelosi and AOC and Schiff should pay tulsi for lessons.

 

what did they meddle with?? Unless they were stuffing ballot boxes, I don’t see how there was any meddling. Do Russians have mind control devices that can tell people how to vote?? I felt no Russian influence when I went to vote.

 

While Clinton is corrupt and may despise working Americans (particularly the "deplorables" who don't support her), the only person she represents is herself. Everyone but her sycophantic admirers knows this.

From the ANSWERnik point of view, perhaps, but few people subscribe to that definition of 'moderate'. To be honest, I'm skeptical that you subscribe to it yourself.

I don't see why she would endorse Clinton, either. Gabbard's views and agenda are more closely aligned with socialists such as Bernie Sanders than the centrists/moderates who aren't peddling their failed and discredited program.

 

Not weird, just petty with a bug up their backside.

 

Are you expecting me to answer for others.

 

I do find certain portions of the right's obsession with her a little interesting. Democrats have no real interest in her at all. And her squabble with Hillary didn't even make our radar.

 

She is like the party of FDR and the common man. Anytime workers and there best self interests is a factor it is called socialism. Yet given production of goods and services is still private sector it isnt classic socialism. The capitalistic economic model finances a larger Commons.

This is what the pre Clinton party was about. And they helped to create a healthier disparity oin income. Instead of disemboweling our working middle class

If that is socialism then our current model is fascism, oligarchy.

 

She reminds me more of FDR vice president and Progressive Party presidential candidate Henry Wallace. Like all "progressives" she's for Big Government. For those reasons she'll never get the vote of this common man.

I guess some people might think and say that but I never would. Throughout history and the world, socialists have often been the working man's worst enemy.

Of course, socialism comes in many varieties, but I agree that in our hybrid socio-economic system free enterprise finances our socialistic welfare state and programs. Without the private sector socialism wouldn't exist in this country.

As a former JFK Democrat about all I can say is that the pre-Clinton party was about a lot of things that were often in conflict with one another, but those days are coming to an end. Today's Democratic party is becoming increasingly indistinguishable from the Socialist Party.

Today's "progressives" have realized what the National Socialists in Germany realized a century ago - the government or ruling party doesn't have to possess/nationalize private enterprise to control the economy - it can exercise de facto control over the economy though government fiat, mandates and regulation. British historian George Watson noted in "Hitler and the Socialist Dream"

 

And there in my news feeds a long puff piece in the New York Times, the paper of record, about guess who

Hillary Clinton, Master Troll?
Freed of the constraints of public office, Mrs. Clinton seems to be living her best life.

...
For most of her public career, Mrs. Clinton has been constrained by the expectations of her position, be it first lady, senator or secretary of state. Now, after her stunning loss in 2016, it seems she finally feels liberated to speak her mind.

And she’s certainly stirring up a lot of drama while doing it. The two-time Democratic presidential candidate continues to loom large in the psyche of her party — both as heroine and villain....

ROFLMAO and you whine she get's discussed here?

Hey no one forces you into a thread.

 

It’s Fun Time: Tulsi Declares War On Hillary And Democratic Establishment.

“If you need any more evidence that Gabbard is correct and Hillary is just being an idiot is that Joy Behar agrees with the former secretary of state. ‘She hasn’t denied it,’ Behar said. ‘She’s just going after Hillary. I just think that she could be a useful idiot the way that Trump is a useful idiot to the Russians’.”​

Corn, popped.

 

let them fight.jpg