Twitter may ban President Trump from social media platform after Inauguration Day

Being an outspoken republican is against Twitter and FB rules. Anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty knows that.

 

Nope. Lying and spreading disproven conspiracy theories is though, which of course describes republicans.

 

Of course. Why not?

 

LOL. 3 years of Russia collusion hoax lies, fake debunked anonymous stories, stolen tax returns and no one was banned... Like I said, anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty knows that.

PS the eternal search for the ultimate truth is over, Jack and a bunch of his degenerate progressive socially inept dorks have a monopoly on it. Duh

 

And some don't understand that free speech does not mean having a right to broadcast what you like on other peoples platforms. Some, like you.

 

Do you say the same thing when the topic is bar/restaurant owners having the right to decide if they allow people to smoke (or don't) in their establishments? How about if churches want to have services where wearing masks are optional? Or even having more than X amount of people in your own home for turkey-day dinner? Or what about letting professional sports teams decide if they're going to allow fans in the stands, and how many? Or any one of 1,000 different things I could come up with where the left (which you seem to be a deeply intrenched member of) is willing to say the hell with freedom, I want the nanny state to protect me!!

Or how about deeper things like following the Constitution as written, and not trying to pretend there's some sort of "but there's a pandemic" excuse somewhere in there that just lets unconstitutional laws happen by fiat? Or even the "antiquated" Second Amendment?

I mean, I like what you wrote there, but it seems completely inconsistent with the political persuasion you've demonstrated over and over again.

 

When the platforms conspire with each other and the media and democrats to suppress opposing views there is a systemic problem.

 

What Russia collusion hoax. The republican led intelligence committee did find the Trump campaign communicated with Russia.

Also the quid-pro quo Ukraine scandal was absolutely true. Trumpers tried to deny it, but then the transcript of the call with Ukraine was released and proved the whistleblower wasn't lying!

 

Not during a National Emergency. Unless Trump tweeting would somehow avert a national emergency, there is a difference. But I sense it's the opposite.

No! It is immoral to put people's life at risk.

Is your point that I should have said "...illegal or immoral" instead of just "immoral"? If that is the case, I stand corrected.

Human morals are not inconsistent with anything I have written. And it's immoral to put people's life in jeopardy. It is also immoral to keep this virus alive by creating crowds where they know it will spread.

I left the "Church" example because the one thing that is inconsistent is for an organization that supposedly considers human life precious, would put human life unnecessarily at risk engage in activity that they know will kill people. Forget inconsistency... they should be ashamed of themselves.

I would look into these institutions, and find out if their intentions are really to promote religion, or just a business intended to separate fools from their money.

This is what I mean when I say I'm in the middle. With one extremist demanding that a private business be forced to allow a nut to use its services for nefarious purposes, and on the other extreme another demanding that businesses do whatever they damn please, even though we know it could WILL cause much death.

 

Sorry, no, there isn't. These are private businesses. Maybe you would prefer living in a country where the government owns the businesses. Like, Venezuela.

 

Don't twist yourself into a pretzel trying to justify the 3 years of lies, smear, insinuations, bogus anonymous stories and bogus anonymous leaks (ALL PROMINTENTLY FEATURED ON TWITTER AND FB) about Trump campaign's perfectly legal and legitimate communication with Russia.

For three years the scummiest most repulsive leftists on the planet used Twitter and FB to baselessly accuse Trump and his campaign of countless crimes, all of that proved to be a hoax and not a single person was ever banned by Twitter or FB. Not one tweet, not one person.

 

Yes, the trump campaign colluded with russians in their illegal efforts to interfere in our election. Everyone knows this. Those that say otherwise are lying to themselves out loud.

 

They are a private business involved in Venezuela/Pravda style censorship and suppression of information. Which is the eyes on freedom loving 1st amendment supporting Americans makes them anti-American fascist scum. Agreed?

PS lest we forget the special protection granted to them by the Congress they continue enjoying, while violating their end of the bargain.

 

No, because that "style" is for when there are penalties under law. So no, your comparison is idiotic.

 

Name one Russian Trump campaign "colluded" with and plz tell us how that Russian interfered with our election.

PS Mueller utterly failed to do this, perhaps you can do better LOL

Wrong. when it acts like Pravda and lies like Pravda and censors like Pravda and suppresses information like Pravda - it's Venezuela/Pravda style.

 

Hah, no, i don't do these troll exercises. You have access to the same information i do. If it has not compelled you already, then laying it at your feet again is a waste of time. Find someone else to do your monkey dance.

 

Bhahaha. Busted, buddy.

Collusion my tail, you're utterly unable to name even one Russian who colluded with Trump and interfered with our election Yet it's Trump who gets banned by Twitter, not millions of progressives like you.

That's the real face of the left for ya. Yuck.

 

Well, the Senate Report says differently. You seem to think candidates conspiring with foreign entities is appropriate. We will see how this unfolds given Pandora's box has been opened.

 

If Parler becomes President Trump's new platform, then Parler will grow significantly. Once the platform attracts tens of millions of followers, it would be hard to ban it.

 

Sure, whatever you have to tell yourself. You saw the Mueller report. It proved collusion between the trump campaign and russians. I have nothing else for you. Maybe someone else will do your troll exercise?

 

In light of Mueller's witch hunt not being able to find any crimes committed by Trump and his campaign, the 3 year worth of Twitter posts on the matter proved to be nothing more than hateful lies, smear, slander, insinuations, and total garbage. Yet not a single post was hidden by Twitter gestapo, not a single lying slanderous lib on Twitter was suspended, let alone banned. Anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty knows that this is true.

 

Too bad you're unable to name even one Russian who colluded with Trump campaign and interfered in our election as you claim. How do we call people who make claims they are not able to back up with facts?

 

Konstantin Kilimnik

 

And how Konstantin Kilimnik interfered with our election again? Did Trump know Kilimnik, how many times Trump talked to Kilimnik? What was the goal of the "collusion" between Trump and Kilimnik? Plz be as specific as you can.

 

**** twitter