Two Issues Republicans Will Win On !

I'll be voting Republican, after being a lifelong Democrat, from here on out for two reasons. First, I'm Fed UP With 95% Of The Entertainment Industry Being Controlled By The 2-5% Homosexual Community. Almost every movie or TV show today has Homosexual component in it , promoting Homosexuality like it's a normal alternative lifestyle to millions of impressionable and confused adolescents in PRIME TIME every night, Well, It’s Not Normal, It’s a Mental Or Physical Disorder That Needs To Be Treated Like You’d Treat Schizophrenia Or Cancer Secondly, I'm friggin tired of the Democrats trying to curb my gun ownership rights with False Flag Events like Sandy Hook which was nothing but a Poorly Executed FEMA / Homeland Security Capstone Drill Modeled after The Dunblane Scotland School Shooting in the 90'S where Hand Gun Ownership was Totally Banned in Great Britain a Year Later which is their goal here. There are 10's of millions of Gun Owning Democrats that are against THE Homosexual Agenda that is High Jacking The Democratic Party . Also , there are 10's 0f millions Democratic Men of all Races saying they'll vote for Hillary in public, But Never Will Inside That Voting Booth ,Guaranteed. Republicans will win the 2016 Presidential Race by a Here’s Landslide !!!

Here's a small % of TV shows with Homosexual Characters or Content without doing an in depth search ,let's see we have the one that started it all Will and Grace, then Six Feet Under , Girls, The L Word, The Walking Dead , The Following, Empire , Backstrom, Chicago Fire , The Royals ,The Big Bang Theory, Curb Your Enthusiasm, The Cleveland Show, King of the Hill, South park, The Simpsons, Glee, The 100 Black Sails, Madame Secretary , Gotham , Kingdom, How to get Away With Murder, The Modern Family, Dominion, Tyrant, The Night Shift, It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, Penny Dreadful, Nurse Jackie ,Star Crossed, The Fall , Peaky Blinders , Wentworth , Defiance, Hemlock Grove, Hannibal , The Bridge , Under The Dome ,Ray Donavan , Orphan Black, Banshee, Betrayal , House of Cards , Alpha House , Masters of Sex , Nashville, Da Vinci's Demons , Arrow, Sons of Anarchy Orange is the New Black, Sherlock ,Skins , Lip Service, How I met your Mother, Xena ,Prison Break , Homicide Life On The Streets , East Enders , Teen Wolf , Torchwood, Sex and the City , Bad Girls ,True Blood , Spartacus ,Game of Thrones , The Vampire Dairies , Shameless , Q ueer As Folk , The Wire ,The Office , Weeds ,Ripper Street , Schitt’s Creek , Eye Candy ,Transparent, The Flash ,Chasing Life ,Hit The Floor ,Dracula , Dates , The Originals ,A Place To Call Home , The Fosters , The Carrie Dairies , Undateable , and American Horror Story just to mention a few there are dozens more. YOU GETTIN THE PICTURE !

 

Half of the basis for your change in party affiliations is that there are to many homosexuals on TV? First of all, I don't think it is an epidemic that there are gay people on television. A homosexual can exist in real life but not in a fictional reality? That doesn't make sense. Secondly, do you really think any electorate is going to elect a politician who promises to launch a crusade on the gay entertainment industry, and if so, how successful do you imagine that politician actually being?

'We'll remove the gay in Hollywood' is a terrible campaign slogan

 

While it is true that not finding women immensely sexually pleasing is abnormal, I would be skeptical of comparing homosexuality to Schizophrenia and Cancer. In the case of Schizophrenia, one cannot have a social life. In the case of cancer, one must always be worrying about their survival.

In the case of homosexuality, one must only worry about the vein judgement of ignorant people.

 

"I Have the Potential of Bringing People Together"

"There is not a liberal America and a conservative America,"

"We are one people,"

“acted stupidly.”

"If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon,”

 

Those are not campaign slogans, but I still think the last one is hilarious. "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon." <-- How much more of a politician could you possibly be?

 

The Homosexual population is about 2-5% and you don;t think the fact that 80-90% of TV programming has either HOMOsexual characters or Content is just a little disproportionate and what's the reason or agenda behind that.?!

 

I don't think the GOP is going to be winning the "war on gay entertainment culture" any time soon. Also, the big bang theory has a gay character on it? Who is it?

 

There are homos in The Flash?

 

There is no agenda. Gay characters sell, and Hollywood is a for profit industry. Learn to deal with it.

 

Have you had your head examined recently? Seems you're obsessively focused.

 

Sorry, but i think the Republicans have pretty much lost this fight.

If Texas secedes on this issue, it could come to a shooting match since Obama will not let Texas go.

 

If Republicans could get back in power at least their would exist a desire to begin a WAR AGAINST the Homosexual TAKEOVER of this Country !
If you vote in a Democratic President they will have the opportunity to appoint upTo 4 new SUPREME COURT JUSTICES PROVIDING A HUGE LIBERAL MAJORITY. From actual past votes of these LIBERAL JUDGES the following is what we have to look forward to

Gun control for example would see states that have the ability to ban any and all guns they want if the liberals were in control, it is how they voted in 2010 in the District of Columbia case where they wanted to ban handguns. The liberals were all for it.
The death penalty would be gone.
Schools could make assignments for students based on race.
Partial-birth abortions would now be legal
Women who felt they were being underpaid would have no time limit on which to file a claim. They could go back 20 years or so if they wanted and start hurling lawsuits at former employers.
Schools would not be able to punish students who openly advocate for illegal drug use on school property.
Lethal injections would be ruled cruel and unusual punishment.
Having to show any form of ID when voting would be ruled unconstitutional.
Employers would no longer be restricted in using race in their hiring process. New Haven had thrown out a number of tests by minorities who had performed badly on certain job applications and this was ruled unconstitutional but the liberals said it was ok to do.
Any prisoner would be able to request DNA testing for any crime they are charged with.
Humanitarian groups would be able to advice terrorist organizations on both legal and illegal activities in the US.
There are so many more but I think you can see the direction a liberal Court would take us. The above are all cases that were decided by the Roberts Court by the way.
Also any rulings dealing with the HOMOsexualS Agenda in this Country would easily go their way and representing only 2-5 % of the population they are wielding a large disproportionate hammer at the present time trying to exert their aberrant lifestyle into mainstream of American society trying to make it look like a normal alternative lifestyle choice which it isn't ,it's abnormal. The election of Democratic President could have very dire detrimental Affects on American Society and our way of life FOREVER !

 

Ha ha - a shooting match? Hardly. The feds will simply cut off funds, that's all they have to do. Texas would have a hard go on its own. Oklahoma might help them by not basing federal troops, but they're in even worse financial shape than Texas is. Louisiana will go with the feds, and so will New Mexico, .... let's see... all the western states are dependent on federal money, the oil producing states "might" be able to make it on their own but not in any immediate time frame.

 

There's always a desire, but it's marginal (in all senses of the word). Even the Republicans depend on the gay vote, that 5 to 10 percent of the population is an important factor.

LOL - you're saying Republicans will be any different? Nah man, look around. We have the Supreme Idiots telling us that money is speech and buildings are people, this stuff goes across parties, it's not just the liberals. You're being played, you're being suckered if you think this is all a partisan battle.

DC is federal territory, that's why it went before the Court.

You think the Republicans are going to do all these things for you?

I think not. I think you're seriously deluded if you think anything is going to change under a Republican president.

Just like nothing changed under a Democrat - for all the hemming and hawing about Obama he turns out to be nothing more than an ordinary corporatist. He does foreign interventions just like Bush does, he lies about national security just like Bush did, ... for all intents and purposes he's a Neo-Con.

There's a different game going on, it's not a partisan game. There's people behind the scenes pulling the strings of both parties, and they're just using you on issues like abortion. Nothing's going to change, the Republicans aren't going to change anything even if they appoint all four Justices. Come on man, the Senate is all over this stuff with their "litmus tests" and whatnot. They're just looking for solid establishment types. Bush installed Roberts and it turns out he's not only a sleeper but he's vulnerable too. And suddenly penalties are taxes, except two days later when they're temporarily not again.... y'know....

 

\

I doubt it. According to this:

http://econpost.com/texaseconomy/texas-economy-ranking-world


Care to trash Texas again?

You really don't understand what Southern pride means if you think Texas will just bow down to your rather skewered views.

I really don't understand why you liberals expect people to not fight you on your issues and your tendencies to be control freaks no different than the conservatives.

 

GDP has nothing to do with it. California has an even bigger GDP and they're in even worse shape from the standpoint of dependency on federal funds. The state as a business entity derives its revenues from taxation and fees, from which they have to provide for the operating budget AS WELL AS all the unfunded and partially funded federal mandates. Do you know how welfare really works? States get block grants (TANF), which they then distribute to counties, which then distribute to the needy. None of that comes from state funds, it's all federal. If you turn that off overnight, suddenly you have 15 to 20 percent of the population starving and with no money whatsoever, so in addition to all the other headaches you're going to have to quell some unrest in the population centers. Trust me, it's a large undertaking. No one's dissing anyone. Just pointing out, the states (every one of 'em) are dependent on the federal government. It's been that way ever since the civil war. States even lose their federal funds if they don't comply with handicapped access laws and stuff like that, there's a lot of regulation in this area.

Not being a Texan, I don't much care what Texas does one way or the other. Live and let live, I say. Hey listen man, I try to save you guys from a financial disaster, it oughta be a favor, right? Psst... if you do that you're going to lose your federal funds, like overnight.... I mean, if you're not thinking about that you're not really planning for secession, right?

Liberals?

(looks around)...

Who, me?

- grin -

Well, let's see... what you'd call a "classical liberal" (of which there aren't any remaining, that I can tell), is now a "constitutional conservative" - if he's a Republican he's in the libertarian wing of the party, most likely. That's pretty much it, the staunch defenders of the constitution used to be the liberals, in the mold of Jefferson - and now there's not even a single Democratic voter that wants to defend the constitution, it's considered a political hot potato that only a rightie would dare to touch.

So, I self-identify as a constitutional conservative, but I'll respond to "classical liberal" too, if it makes you happy.

 

Quote Originally Posted by Don Townsend View Post
I'll be voting Republican, after being a lifelong Democrat.

I've voted a straight Democratic ballot ever since Jimmy Carter until now. I still don't agree on everything with the Republicans .but the issues in my OP trump everything else for me right now.and I'm positive my message will resonate with 50+ voters of all races and parties, a voting block of over 20% that votes 90% of the time.

 

Lol...He might have been a Dixiecrat.

 

Yep, just look at the NBA. You go, Don!

I have an equally perplexing question. How come I never got angry when watching MAD TV? Inquiring minds want to know!

 

So you're claiming that most old people are hysterical homophobes?

 

I don't know if the GOP will win and what will be the cause that puts them over the top if they do win, but it sure as hell isn't going to be these. For the record, Sandy Hook happened. My dad knows one of the mothers.

 

there's no gay character on a lot of those shows, do you mean one of the actors? dam if we can't let gays become actors then hollywood and broadway will have to be shutdown lol

why do you keep copy and pasting this crap you posted the same thing here

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=407852&page=3&p=1064981677#post1064981677

also its all over the internet I googled the first sentence and its plastered on atleast 10 other websites, including your facebook page

Do you get paid for this?

 

Some Dixiecrats did hang around for a while. And there's a lot of religious Dems who vote for them because of their social programs even if they disagree with them morally.

 

There is a Homosexual character or Homosexual content on everyone of those shows and many many more, The Big Bang Factor ,although one of the lesser offenders, for instance is constantly eluding to a possible sexual attraction between Horowitz and Kutherpulli and Amy is portrayed as having a sexual attraction to Penny and Amy is constantly making remarks about possible lesbian activities between her and the other two girls, also Kutherpauli 's parents set him up with in Indian girl that wanted to marry him just to satisfy her parents because she was HOMOsexual and thought kutherpaulli was also so it would be a good arrangement. There not fooling anyone, these story lines are meant to appease HOMOsexual viewers , But even this show presents it as acceptable and normal behavior to younger viewers .

 

A desire is not the same thing as doing. A desire already exists, but it won't happen, even if they're in power. Desires are a nice method for keeping people in line. Promise someone you'll do something and they'll wait for your results, even if you don't do it.

What did half of those things have to do with Homosexuality?