U.S. Marshalls tackled and tasered Ammon Bundy's Lawyer <Mod Alert>

Let us revisit this after the wrongful arrest proceedings.

Over or under, what do you think? 1,000,000? I'm thinking more.

Cheers

 

Yes if it had been some negro lawyer being treated that way--the social justice warriors would be screaming to high heaven...such hypocrites...quite disgusting.

 

If billary had not been so stooopid as to inform the Pakistani Government we were launching some cruise missles at bin laden's camp--very likely binladen would not have been around to hatch the 9/11 ...not even to mention if bill had treated the first attack on the WTC as an act of war instead of just a criminal act...we may have also avoided the second attack.

The clintons were a disaster for Arkansas first and then the media enabled them to become a disaster for all of America.

http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clinton-crime-family-exposed/

 

Most of the troubles we see in the world today can be traced back to the Clinton administration. Bin Laden's first Fatwa where in the name of Muhammad and Al Qaeda where OBL declared war on America, the 9-11 terrorist attacks, the Russian bear coming out of hibernation, the begining of social engineering of the military and American manufactures moving off shore.

There's a reason why the White House FBI Liaison Office and the Secret Service called the Clinton White House "Animal House." It's in reference to National Lampoons movie, "Animal House."

1/2 of the White House staff couldn't be granted a security clearance and there was so much drug use going on, Hillary had one room in the White House known as the cocaine den.

 

you guys kill me, so the Bush admin gets a warning that 911 may happen, and you blame Clinton for 911 too

 

It all started back in 1993 in a place called Mogadishu.

From Al Qaeda's decleration of war against America aka OBL first Fatwa.

 

does your party take responsibility for anything? Bush started two 10+ year wars, that is all on him

 

Sounds like just another day in the Police State.

Shut up, slave!

 

Get you facts straight, Al Qaeda started the war in 1996.

Technically the USA and the UK has been at war with Iraq since 1990. During the first Gulf war, Iraq didn't surrender, only a cease fire agreement was signed.

During the Clinton administration Iraq violated that agreement over a hundred times. Obama had eight years to deal with Iraq and failed. But Clinton did sign into law the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 and five years later G.W. Bush would enforce that law that Clinton signed into law.

Where Bush (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up big time was not following the Weinberger and Powell doctrines. Unlike daddy Bush (41) who followed the Weinberger and Powell doctrines that basically said you don't go to war unless you have a Reagan type of military, little Bush (43) went to war with Clinton's military.

Who ever is the next POTUS will be, he or she are (*)(*)(*)(*)ed big time, they will be inheriting Obama's feminized PC military.

We are (*)(*)(*)(*)ed.

 

Your reading is pathetic.

I didn't say you aren't allowed to yell. You know that, right?

However, when the judge orders that you (*)(*)(*)(*), and you continue yelling you can expect ramifications.

 

The most one could have expected in this case was for the judge to cite the lawyer for contempt of court...but even that would have been excessive as it really never reached that level.

Take a clue from the legal community on this one pal...what the marshalls did was extremely excessive ...most especially when they ignored the judges order to back off.

http://www.kgw.com/news/local/bundy...s-during-heated-argument-with-judge/343359074

https://photographyisnotacrime.com/...u-s-marshals-taser-and-arrest-bundy-attorney/

https://youtu.be/9JBIZN4ndUw

 

Anyone who has actually listened to that show, as I tried for awhile, can tell the bias is a right wing bias. Also, don't get me wrong, there's bias on both sides, for example Fox carries water for the right, and MSNBC for the left. There is where I'm proud not to be a partisan hack, I recognize bias on both sides, and I recognize it's wrong, no matter which side it comes from.

 

I don't see where your cites include anything from the "legal community".

What I see is statements from those with an interest in defending the attorney.