Unarmed woman is shot by Police in Capitol. The People Who Scream ‘Police Brutality’ Don’t Care.

All we got is the fascist mob standing by and standing ready. And previously they responded that they would do exactly that. I sourced that. And when they were told to fight like hell or else lose their country... they did exactly that. The entire world saw that. I'm not interested in anything "possible" if you can't prove a thing about it.

It's fine if you don't find the exact words. But so far you got ZERO. So you got NOTHING.

 

I proved people linked to the riot were armed with loaded guns...
that and they used other weapons, like clubs and chemical agents.

They all got that racism smear on them. I proved it

My point is:
Cops do not shoot violent fascist busy killing them,
while not having a problem shooting a black man fleeing.

It still stands.

So my point stands.

 

They say that this killed him. So that is "cause of death", without using those exact words.

I sourced the press release about the fire extinguisher.

 

I guess we can close this thread now.
Officer Cleared In The Shooting Death Of Ashli Babbitt During Capitol Riot : NPR

 

Unfortunately, this thread is going NOWHERE, given my ongoing back and forth with another member! Although, this thread should be moved from the 'News' section, and frankly I'm STUNNED that it hasn't been!

 

If he fell down some steps after tripping on something and hit his head on the ground which killed him,
his death could STILL have been described in those terms - "injured while engaging rioters, and he died of those injuries."

Anyway, it looks like you agree that we do not know the official cause of death. FINALLY! We got there in the end!

I thought that you were talking about the DC Police Statement. Unfortunately for you, the "press release about the fire extinguisher" has been proven WRONG! It came from an anonymous source! I thought that you already acknowledged that!

 

So EVERYONE who was at the protest, including the peaceful ones were "linked" to the riot?

That's not what you said. You said that all police are the same!

Okay, so you admit that your OTHER point does NOT stand! This point:

"The 6th of January was a fascist mob protesting against fair elections."

So you admit that Blake DEFINITELY WAS reaching for a possible gun, but Capitol rioters only COULD have been reaching for a possible gun!

 

This has PRECISELY NOTHING to do with whether or not Trump is responsible for the riot. If you think that he is responsible,
then that means you think that if he DID NOT say what he said, there would have been no riot!

Saying that something is POSSIBLE does not require any proof! However, if you want to say that the only reason they rioted was because Trump said "fight like hell", THAT DOES require proof! However, you seem to be staying away from that claim, which is a wise move!

Trump did not mean "STAND READY TO FIGHT" because he told them to STAND BACK, which CANCELS OUT
telling them to "stand by" which he said in the same sentence! When did Trump say that he meant "STAND READY TO FIGHT?"

 

All you did was link to the articles. And the articles did not say that the peaceful protesters were the only protesters there! If they did, you would have already quoted it from the articles!

He testified that the people from what he could observe were peaceful!

Read the testimony extract again: "officers acted with tremendous restraint in the face of severe violence." Sounds to me like he is saying that some of them were not peaceful! OUCH!

I didn't say that he IS above the constitutional 1st amendment rights of the people! I didn't even talk specifically about Trump. I said that the President gets to go WHEREVER THE HELL HE OR SHE WANTS, just like Biden does now! If the protesters were cleared to make way for Trump, then it means that they were in his way! They were told to move on, but they refused! Even if they were peaceful before being ordered to move, they refused to move on, so they were no longer peaceful!

 

OK Daniel, let's see the evidence that they "killed one". Jump to leftist conclusion much?

 

You won't get a reply.

 

There is no if, when you got nothing to back it up.

 

This is about that the fascists were armed -I proved that- yet were not killed when they attacked the police.

The racism is on many levels and is a systemic problem. That does cover it all for the point I made.

It does stand. Your idea that they were there for just taking foto's is a total joke to reality.

There was no gun. The thug shot Blake "believing he was attempting to kidnap a child in the backseat of the vehicle he was entering".... while all 3 kids were Blake's.

So my point stands:
Cops do not shoot violent fascist busy killing them,
while not having a problem shooting a black man fleeing.

 

You're childishly not taking into account he did say to fight like hell or else lose your country to a fascist mob who he previously said to stand by and ready to indeed act now.

All I am saying is that when you can't prove this, than I do label it as an absurd wild conspiracy theory that's not backed up by any facts. And you can't dispute that label.

The entire bench of your random ice hockey game is full with players standing by and standing ready to substitute the players on the field.
Your idea that standing by cancels out to be ready is just absurd.

 

All in all.. you support Donald beating away peaceful protesters and trash their 1st amendment rights for the sake of Donald getting a picture taken.

The article indeed said they were peaceful, and so that does mean that there were only peaceful protesters.
You claiming there was 1 or 2 or more who were violent is still a conspiracy you failed to prove.

That testimony is just when the cops began beating away the protesters. It says zero about if the protesters not acted peacefully before the cops showed up and that the removal was necessary. Ouch.

 

Clearing protesters from a particular area is NOT trashing their 1st amendment rights. Why can't they protest in a different location?

No. It's a FACT that peaceful protesters were cleared. The articles you source are simply reporting a FACT - a fact which I acknowledge. However, this doesn't mean that the peaceful protesters were the only protesters there!

The police statement said that there was violence and the police chief testified that in Congress. You claiming that the police conspired with Trump to forcefully remove protesters for a photo op, under the false cover of the protesters being violent, is still a conspiracy you failed to prove!

How do you know that?

 

.

 

So Trump IS responsible for the riot then? Yet you cannot say whether the riot would have happened if Trump did NOT say it!

Again, if you want to say that the only reason they rioted was because Trump said "fight like hell", that requires proof! However, you seem to be staying away from that claim, which is a wise move!

Why the hell are you talking about ice hockey? Again, Trump did not mean "STAND READY TO FIGHT" because he told them to STAND BACK, which CANCELS OUT
telling them to "stand by" which he said in the same sentence! When did Trump say that he meant "STAND READY TO FIGHT?"

 

"Armed" with guns, or other weapons?

How do you know that everyone at the Capitol protest was a "fascist?"

The cops didn't know that. I've always said that he was reaching for a POSSIBLE gun.

"At the time Sheskey opened fire, Blake held a knife in his hand and twisted his body toward the officer,"

This was Kenosha Police. January 6 police were DC Police.

 

You got nothing to back up that he DID NOT fall down some steps after tripping on something and hit his head on the ground. And I'm not saying that he DID, I'm saying that it's POSSIBLE! Whereas you're trying to say that it's NOT possible!

And nothing further about the fire extinguisher? Does the "fire extinguisher" still go "hand in hand" with with the police statement which said nothing about any fire extinguisher?

 

That is you suggesting a riot would have happened regardless if Donald was there or not... but you know... that's an unfounded wild conspiracy theory.
That's all your good for.

I already proved that the fascists previously accepted to do the stand by and stand ready as they were told by Donald.

This is deranged.. you failed to prove what Donald meant. That's just a unfounded wild conspiracy theory.
And Donald told them fascists to stand by and stand ready.... which they did.
And than Donald cancel out "stand by and stand ready" by saying fight like hell.... which they did.

 

I showed you the were beating a cop who was lying faced down with clubs.... in an attempt to kill him or else give seriously bodily harm.... yet they did not shoot any of them.

They were there to demand their right wing president gets to be president when they were democratically outvoted.
So that's just calling a spade a spade.

The people attacking the cops at the capitol also were able to reach for their guns they had.... yet were not shot when attacking the cops. Blake was shot when fleeing. My point stands.

Towards the officer? Blake was fleeing and the cops went after him, not the other way around. You're not honest with this. It was the fascists who went towards the officers and did attack them.

 

This is your claim, and YOU got nothing to back it up.
I don't need to debunk or prove anything you are claiming... that's all on you.

 

I'm not saying that he DID hit his head after falling down some steps after tripping on something. I'm saying that it's POSSIBLE! Whereas you're trying to say that it's NOT possible!

And nothing further about the fire extinguisher? Does the "fire extinguisher" still go "hand in hand" with with the police statement which said nothing about any fire extinguisher?

 

"Clubs?" Okay, so you're NOT in fact saying that the ones attacking cops were armed with guns. Got it!

That's not the definition of 'fascist.'

Yes, they were ABLE to, but DID they? And you STILL haven't even proven that the ones attacking the cops had guns!

Where do you think he was fleeing to?

This was Kenosha Police. January 6 police were DC Police.