Unusually cold polr Summer

It looks like the upcoming ice age is upon us.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/08...zing-this-year-there-was-less-than-half-that/

 

The Warmers will tell you its just weather, and you're a dummy for not believing in AGW.

But after a decade and a half of Warmers and the media using every summer daytime high of over ninety degrees F as irrefutable evidence of AGW, we are equally empowered to use every lower than normal temperature as equally irrefutable evidence against AGW.

BTW, over a year ago, I posted picture taken in 1957 of two US Navy nuclear subs sitting on the surface at the North Pole - in open water.

 

So then, the stupidity of the Pentagon is nothing new.

 

Exactly when the weather is warm it is used as evidence of man made global warming.

 

No it isn't, they're not so stupid as to confuse the two.

 

I read the media do it all the time to back the idea of man made global warming. I see it constantly on forums. I hear people in person say it all of the time.

 

No you didn't

 

"Exactly when the weather is warm it is used as evidence of man made global warming."

Taxcutter says:
And our board Warmers have the mendacity to deny that practice.

 

As opposed to the lies you spread in post #2

 

"No you didn't"

Taxcutter says:
Yes I did. Even moon looked away for the paleos long enough to notice.

 

There was no such mission in 1957

 

Sure, Admiral Rickover.

 

There is a trend, which is white clear over the decades time frame generally used to distinguish "Weather" from "Climate":

"While the extent of winter sea ice has trended downward at a less drastic rate than summer sea ice, the fraction of the sea ice cover that has survived at least two melt seasons remains much smaller than at the beginning of the satellite era. This older, thicker "multi-year ice" – which buttresses the ice cap against more severe melting in the summer – grew slightly this past winter and now covers 1.03 million square miles (2.67 million square kilometers), or about 39,000 square miles more than last winter. But its extent is still less than half of what it was in the early 1980s.

"I think the multi-year ice cover will continue to decline in the upcoming years," Comiso said. "There’s a little bit of oscillation, so there still might be a small gain in some years, but it continues to go down and before you know it we’ll lose the multi-year ice altogether."

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/arctic-seaicemax-2013.html

 

duck and weave little boy. When you going to admit you are wrong?

 

OK, John Paul Jones. Check these out. Google can be your friend.

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/photo-north-pole-submarine
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/seadragon-and-skate-north-pole-1962.jpg

Your intellectual indolence is showing.

Unlike the Warmers, I don’t make stuff up.

 

Wake me up when cattle and sheep can graze on Greenland without electricity or other heat.
That's what the Viking colonies did 1,000 years ago.
Graveyard bones indicate by nitrogen isotopes that the early colony got 80% of its' protein from land animals.
There are written documents from this period of history.
Why do "we" deny it.

The globe is not doing anything it did not do before within recorded history.

Is the sky falling?
No! National borders just don't allow people to move to greener pastures. That is the horror and cost.
Not man made global warming but, man made borders not allowing free, natural migrations.

Moi

 

LOL -

Here is a photo of the only time the US Skate surfaced at the north pole.



Your second photo is US Skate and Seadragon meeting on July 31st before continuing to the pole for exercises. Neither vessel surfaced during this 1962 exercise.

I would explain how nuclear subs can surface from under arctic ice, but I suspect I would be wasting my time