Va. House Dems pass buck on hearing rape allegations against Lt. Gov. Fairfax

Far from, Professor. Why are you so full of rage about letting the legal system gather the evidence?

 

You have no proof.

 

Only you care what you think.

 

The fact is you have no proof, so what you think without proof is not fact. Everyone can see that.

 

Post #95 points out one example hypocrisy in regards to Billy boy and Trump. Now what say you?
Or will you continue to respond to something that I didn't say.
You should probably report me, I'm a bad man.

 

That's right: you "did'nt say", you alleged without facts a point that does not exist.

Stay with the facts.

 

The Left has always been rather unshocked by sexual assault by their leaders.

Republican delegate plans committee hearing where Fairfax accusers can testify.

Just as the press had managed to sweep this story out of the news.

 

I pointed it out on the most remedial level to make it easy after you demanded I do so and from you nothing. Why do you ask if you weren't going to honestly respond?
I was already letting it go. You wasted my time. Punk move dude.

 

WELL, OF COURSE NOT, THEY’RE DEMOCRATS: No call from Democratic governors for Virginia leaders embroiled in scandals to step down.

Yes, that last item is the crucial factor. They’re happy to lecture you about morals and standards, but their number one standard is hanging on to power for Democrats.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/322637/

 

As would the Republicans.

Let the legal system work.

 

You are reduced to arguing a counterfactual. Sad!

Dems are such frauds

 

I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the right.

Why do the far right not want the charges investigated before action?

 

Accuser Vanessa Tyson Says She is Ready to Testify Before Virginia General Assembly that Democratic Lt. Gov. Fairfax Sexually Assaulted Her

 

Fine. She can testify once the DA is done with his investigation.

 

Yeah?

And, so what?

He said/She said.

 

Like Donald and Joe, yeah. No biggie.

 

I said.........

You replied....

My response was.....

Your ridiculous response was......

It took me all of 10 to 15 seconds to find it. Ask your grand kids for help with Google.

 

Some sillies want proof that something did not happen.,

 

Wrong!!! And you illustrate the problem with 10 to 15 second "research". Which is the norm and the best we could ever expect from the right.

First of all, the DOJ issued the following statement:
“The FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation. The purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI’s role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers.”
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/18/6490...estigate-kavanaugh-allegations-it-likely-wont

In the supplemental investigation, the FBI did not corroborate the allegations, but they also did not find them to be false. They didn't interview Kavanaugh or Dr. Ford. The FBI did not investigate other allegations such as those by Julie Swetnick or interviewed Swetnick.

And, BTW, the supplemental report was never made public. Only a summary by the GOP. So I say again: no FBI report found the allegations against Kavanaugh baseless. The fact that the Republican Senate refused to make the report public, even a redacted version, is quite telling.

10 to 15 second research gives you time to search and read the headline, but not the article you submit. And this fact is obvious on your superficial post. 10 seconds to look up a right wingnut site that cherry-picks the information and 5 seconds to go to the link provided there to USAToday to make it look as if it were serious.

I know the right doesn't mind if they end up looking foolish when they just repeat what they find on their fake news sites But those of us who want to know the facts don't want to look foolish. So we take more than 10 to 15 seconds

 

I nominate this post as the Comedy Gold post of the month. An attack that allegedly took place 36 years ago where the victim can't remember where it happened, how she got there or who was even there. Additionally, the folks she said were there denied being there. Anyone with 3 working synapsis knows that's the very definition of baseless. Your article of "truth" was published before the hearing and is full of pre-hearing hype.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02 Kavanaugh Report.pdf

Read the Senate report for yourself.

 

ProfessorPeabody should be reading Golem for clarification, because PP does not get it so far.

 

Another 15 second research led you to believe that a victim cannot possibly forget any minuscule detail of an attack that they have been trying to forget for 36 years?

Your attempt at changing the subject is as lame as they come. But fortunately for you, this thread is not about Kavanaugh. There are many threads about Kavanaugh. All this nonsense was debunked there. Look up one that has a title that starts as "Falsus in uno...." It pretty much sums up and debunks all your myths.

 

Once again Golem clarifies matters for ProfessorPeabody.

 

I'm sure YOU understand 'em.

 

I gave you a link to the Senate report, maybe you can get Starkey to read it to you........uh, on second thought.