Viktor Shokin: Biden outraged we seized Burisma assets

Do you feel the same way about the testimony of the ambassador fired by Trump? If not why not?

 

What mythical "clown-show " you talking about? What was not investigated ?
If mean that there was no investigation of Burisma by that corrupt Turd Shokin that is proof that Old Man Biden did nothing wrong since if there was no investigation of Burisma by Shokin that means Biden could close anything down that was not happening and never was happening.

Biden could not shut down an investigation that never existed. That what I have been telling you gauys

https://www.ft.com/content/3c3e0aec-e2a2-11e9-b112-9624ec9edc59
Here is the truth as FT Financial times reported. Shokin was the corrupt prosecutor who failed to investigate and failed to help the U.K. investigate the owner of Burisma.

There is an investigation now ( as of Sept 29, 2019 about the Owner of Burisma with gas exploration licenses. The investigation goes back to the time BEFORE Young Boy Biden was on the board of Burisma.

 

We the people are not stupid. If Biden or the Bidens did anything wrong with the Burisma connection why was there no investigation of the Bidens started the afternoon of Jan 20, 2017 ??????

I will tell all of why there was no investigation of the Bidens as of Jan 20, 2017. THE REASON WAS THAT BIDEN WAS NOT RUNNING FOR POTUS YET.

 

Oh I dunno, maybe it had something to do with a massive Obama administration coup attempt that was going on: Russia Russia Russia RRREEEE.

You're right, the American people aren't stupid, and all of them know that even if Biden gets the nomination, which is in and of itself hilarious, Trump will beat him like a drum.

Biden doesn't even know where the **** he is right now.

 

What coup attempt? A coup against who?

 

Oh we're pretending again.

The POTUS, of course.

 

True. We have all seen what the MSM can do with a story.

I just have a hard time including Fox in that when it comes to such partisan issues.

 

Fox not as much, but there are and have been a number of leftist leaning people at Fox.

There are other sources besides Fox....but you're talking everyone on cable news and a segment of Fox that works as activists instead of journalists.

So yeah, not all, but the vast majority of the MSM cable news.

 

Yes. I did. Then he was corroborated by many others so his credibility returned.

 

Them having actual lefties raises their credibility. That they tend to make them tokens then dashes it again.

And Foxs entire origin is activism against the Anti Nixon crowd lol

 

Trump was not POTUS until noon Jan 20,2017. Obama stopped being POTUS at noon Jan 20, 2017. Therefore Obama had no power to commit a coup attempt after he was no longer POTUS.

 

I agree.

Personally I encourage them to talk as much as possible. That makes it easier to catch them.

I'm not sure what you mean by "token".

Give me an example of a story that Fox has posted that turned out to be manufactured. We can do that all day with the other channels.

 

Yeah and they were trying to stop him from becoming POTUS before he was even elected.

That's interesting, since all Democrats have done since 2016 is investigate their political opponent to affect an election.

 

Interesting, his credibility huh?

 

You failed.
Stopping someone from being elected is not a coup. You cannot have a coup until the target is in office.

Try again.

PS there is not any proof that anything illegal was done before or after Trump was elected.

 

According to the IG. Whose scope was very small

 

Clutch tightly to that.

 

You obviously do understand what a coup is or you do but are making up stuff.

 

LOL, must be why Yovanovitch expressed dismay that the investigation was shelved.

 

Without verification

 

What are you talking about. The CUA and other Intel agencies do not, and should not dilulge national security processes.

Are you claiming that 16 or 17 I tell agencies just MUS. If you are that us just wrong on your part and unAmerican to try and destroy the working of our Intel agencies.

You wanted the Russians to know how our Intel agencies get Intel? That would be traitorous.

 

What do you mean by "turned out to be manufactured"? Like, do you mean a whole story was made up wholesale by a reporter or the company? Or saying things that turn out to be untrue (whether they knew it was true or not before they said it)

Because as far as my experience with Fox goes, their affiliate and local reporting and news is actually quite excellent. Fox News Cable, seems to be more about, misrepresentations or selective pushing of various aspects of the stories they decide to give air time too, all with the specific goal of helping the Republicans and Conservatives and hurting the purported enemies of those two things.

Petty things like Hannity editing and Obama speech out of context, or the various fights over crowd size pictures and terrible attempts to edit them to be bigger.

Its no secret that at least statistically, Fox News viewers are less educated about what's going on in the world.

Though, in a weird defense of Fox, they don't really try to pretend they are anything else.

The others have this sneering veneer of "fair and balanced" (ironic) when they really really aren't.

CNN maybe at one time but pretty much post Jeff Zucker and that Malaysian airlines that disappeared, they are more of a clown car then a news organization.

Sure. Or whatever word youd prefer to use to indicate believability.

 

So you dont know, thanks.
Maybe they found the evidence right next the WMD

 

That pretty much shows where you stand on bullshit (you are pro)

 

I watched her testimony and was therefore well aware she said she had been prepped on answers to give if asked about Hunter Biden. What I want is a Link to what you asserted she said, which was, to remind you........."And Yavanovitch testified she had a "large binder" on how to answer questions about Biden/Burisma
if it came up."

Where is the link to where she said.....and you emphasised it inside quotation marks...........large binder?