Virginia Governor Defends Letting Infants Die

Non-viable infants are already being killed by nature. Do you believe that doctors should keep them alive just to prolong their suffering?

 

In fact there are many people waiting to adopt children. While killing them after they're born might be the first inclination of leftists, and the easiest immediate solution, there are obviously other choices.

One of the boldest lies created around leftism is that they 'care' about other people, the young and the infirm. That's never been true and never will be.

 

It's a difficult issue.

I support voluntary euthanasia for consenting adults.

For children, if it's a choice between suffering and death and death, I choose death. But if it's a choice between suffering and life and death, I choose suffering and life.

 

You are wrong. There would be tens of thousands that would never be adopted.

Do you agree to expand Medicaid and welfare to every child in America?

 

Can you demonstrate how I'm wrong? In fact there are over one million couples ready to adopt.

There is already a Medicaid program for children.

 

Well you can prove that. Already on this thread has been posted the number of abortions vs those seeking adoption.

 

if you already have the numbers why are you asking me?

https://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/waiting_adoptive_families

https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/bhs/children-and-youth/index.html

 

Oh, you mean facilities where they won't help women ontain abortions.

 

The decision belongs to the pregnant woman.

 

I'm not asking you. I m telling you

 

They're no longer pregnant once the baby has left the woman's body, and that's what we're talking about. It's gone from abortion at first trimester to second trimester to third trimester to infanticide.

 

Tell it to an African woman, or a middle eastern one? They'd probably be grateful for enforced sterilization and not have to keep churning out sprogs each and every year until their fertility declines, and wouldn't that do wonders for the upcoming global population explosion.

 

And where in the world is that happening?

 

That first link is weird

It uses some, questionable, statistics to claim that 6.1 women face fertility problems and then does some slight of hand to make it look like that many would adopt. BUT even if that highly inflated figure were true with over half a million abortions occurring each year in the USA how long before the market is saturated?

Then there is the issue of the “unwanteds”

Many babies are never adopted because they are “crack babies” or have FASD or some other health issue, including being the wrong colour

 

Do you rEALLY want to repeat the Romanian experience?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_orphans

 

If the woman would prefer having her tubes tied, she should be able to have the procedure.

 

'able to have the procedure'? She should be encouraged to have it. Bribed, even.

 

What liberals want is the legal right to kill babies for any reason or no reason at all

 

I haven't met these people.

 

Next time you pass through new york or virigina make an appointment with the democrat governor and you will be face to face with a known supporter of infanticide

 

And at 9 months when they can still be aborted, they are the size of a baby.

 

Meet the Governor of Virginia and all the legislators who supported the bill.

 

Evil, they are utterly evil.. that'd be like meeting a demon.. think I'd pass!

 

What are you talking about? Why shouldn't she have other options like birth control?

 

Generalizing the traits of one member of a group to the whole group is fallacious gibberish on steroids.