Washington's Death Star to Protect US Investments from "Have Nots"

Discussion in 'Warfare / Military' started by Horhey, May 7, 2012.

  1. Horhey

    Horhey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This seems to be the endgame for the Empire.

    Translation: Space militarization allows protection of U.S. investments without the messy restrictions of international law. All the better to ensure the "have-nots" don't step out of line.

    [​IMG]

    The Space Command released it's AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN to go beyond U.S. "control" of space for military purposes to "ownership," which is to be permanent. Ownership of space is "key to our nation’s military effectiveness," permitting:

    Similar plans had been outlined in the May 2002 "Defense Planning Guidance", partially leaked, which called for a strategy of "forward deterrence" in which missiles launched from space platforms would be able to carry out almost instant "unwarned attacks:"

    Military analyst William Arkin comments that:

    -"Full Spectrum Dominance"
     
  2. Horhey

    Horhey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In a speech in front of the Obama administration, Putin warns that the Death Star will provoke an arms race if the program is not terminated.

    [video=youtube_share;0OXGSS7qF2A]http://youtu.be/0OXGSS7qF2A[/video]
     
  3. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Both democracy and the United Nations are vehicles for aggression, not to prevent it.

    Democracy from the beginning was merely a tool for the elites to manipulate the people at the bottom of the pyramid.

    The UN began with a declaration by F. D. Roosevelt and Churchill they called the Atlantic Charter in which they declared war on Germany.

    The only legitimate use of force is defensive against he who initiates force. (Ayn Rand)

    He is using the language of the smug faces of McCain and Biden sitting right there in front of him.

    RussMinistryEmergencySituations2.gif putin_bush3.JPG

    http://royalamericaninstituteforworldpeace.org/main.html
     
  4. Horhey

    Horhey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah, I was going to start a thread showing why the US supported the creation of the UN. The UN was originally supposed to be a tool the US could use for it's global designs. This is fact. I'll put it all together shortly.
     
  5. unclebob

    unclebob New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The US will never unilaterally control space. Never.

    It would start a arms race between US, Russia, China and probably even the EU. Out of those players, I don't see the US winning that race... especially not now.

    Stupid, unnecessary attempt by the US to cling on to power which it is all to aware is slipping from its grasp. Its quite sad to watch.The US needs to get to grips with the fact that it will no longer be the only superpower within the next 2 or 3 decades and live with that fact. If they dont, they will find themselves very isolated. It may well bite them on the arse.
     
  6. mikezila

    mikezila New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    23,299
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i had friends on that Death Star! :angered:

    I_b9c191_1649329.jpg
     

Share This Page