WATCH: Dangerous Scene as Pro-Abortion 'Protesters' Gather at Justices' Homes, Attempt to Pressure T

You're splitting hairs out of desperation to defend the actions of the terrorists.

 

You are exaggerating my "claim".

No, I posted a direct quote from an article I linked. Apparently "bodies" are buying or your wouldn't be so upset.

And some of those "thousands" are repetitive. There are MANY "examples" of imported RW instigators that caused riots associated with BLM protests.

I'm living in the real world, it's your side that likes "alternative facts". I'm not sure "I" said "mostly", some of the articles I quoted may have; if "I" said mostly that's why.

It sure has your panties in a bunch.

AbsaByGodLutely!

I'm talking about the violence of 2020, I don't know what you're talking about. Truth is my agenda.

???? what ????

 

He just knew his hypocrisy was showing. I’ve read reports by reporters that the justice protest that is still going on is the scariest thing they have witnessed and is a clear attempt at intimidation to change their vote. Sound familiar? I never tried to say the 1-6 rioters were right. I was okay with the protest but those who entered the capital, or chose to fight police should be held criminally liable. As for this I’m seeing the same liberals that condemned 1-6 support this. Why is that?

 

No, it isn't. The actions of these terrorists are illegal.

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

 

What's happening now doesn't come close to "insurrection"; read what I posted re. insurrection.

Yet you've linked nothing.

NOTHING SIMILAR, IN ANY WAY.

‘Let’s Burn This Place Down’: Left Calls For Violence After Treasonous SCOTUS Abortion Leak
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/0...olence-after-treasonous-scotus-abortion-leak/[/QUOTE]
The federalist is a RW rag trying to obfuscate Benedict Donald's, very real, INSURRECTION.

 

Of course it does it is trying to interfer with an official proceeding and overturn a branch of government with threats of violence and intimidation including going after their families.

What are you denying that has to be proved to you, the Pro-Abortion fire bombing, the riots in LA?

THE SAME.

The federalist is a RW rag trying to obfuscate Benedict Donald's, very real, INSURRECTION.[/QUOTE]

What about the people they directly quote, lack of rebuttal noted.

 

They are NOT trying to overturn a branch of government. <--period "Going after their families" is an unsupportable exaggeration. Those making violent threats should be investigated and prosecuted where applicable. The violence, so far, is nothing close to threatening the WAY WE ARE Governed.<--period

"YOU" don't have to prove a thing to me.

These Row v Wade protests have NotAFuckingThing in common with the INSURRECTION ATTACK on our Nations Capitol, January 6th 2021. <-- P E R I O D

I repeat: The federalist is a RW rag trying to obfuscate Benedict Donald's, very real, INSURRECTION. The lack of rebuttal is because as soon as I saw the "Federalist" by line I stopped reading.

 

Crazy how much liberals like abortions that they go to peoples houses to protest. I guess that's easier than wearing protection??!?

 

YES they want the conservative justices out and theirs in and their expected decision overturned even before it is announce. Interfering with an official proceeding. They are engaged in violence and intimidation to influence that decision, that is insurrection and they are not only engaged in it in DC they have gone to the homes of these justices and other politicians and rioting in the streets. They are also engaged in gross violations of 18 USC 1507. I repeat read what those who were quoted are saying and stop with the shoot the messenger lame defense.

Now justify why these protesters/rioters/insurrectionist should not be pursued with the same fervor as the Jan 6ers and prosecuted and that includes anyone who incites it.

 

The federalist is a RW rag trying to obfuscate Benedict Donald's, very real, INSURRECTION.[/QUOTE]
What's happening now is illegal, no matter what you want to call it.

 

Demonstrating is part of Government by the people. What you are claiming doesn't make it so because "YOU" say so. The MAJORITY are NOT engaged in violence, those that are should be charged and prosecuted according to the law. They have gone to the homes of these justices and other politicians and are DEMONSTRATING in the streets; that's where most demonstrations take place. "Gross" is a gross exaggeration, but if the DA decides to prosecute under that code then they will have to face justice. I'm not reading the "Federalist".<--period

 

Some of it appears to be "illegal" and should be prosecuted, if the DA thinks he has a case. What "I" want to call it is, for the most part, are peaceful demonstrations; where it isn't and violates the law ... it should be prosecuted.

 

The law is clear: these terrorist demonstrations are illegal.

 

I don't think the "demonstrations" are terrorist or illegal. The violence is and should be prosecuted.

 

It's absolutely illegal. The law says so, in no uncertain terms:

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

 

EVERYONE of the January 6th Benedict Donald supporters broke the law; EVERYFUCKINGONE! Out of close to Three Thousand only 750 were charged.

SO! We'll see how many of the demonstrators are charged; won't we. I would hope those that get violent are prosecuted.

 

Those ladies in the video don't look at all violent to me. They just don't.

 

Equally? Equally is the wrong term. One side of this issue could be burning their opponents homes down! That doesn't imply the other side has any kind of right to an 'equal' response. I would prefer both sides to act legally when protesting while also respecting the personal space and private lives of both their opponents & the public at large. Alas, the US being the US and emotions on this topic being what they are? My hopes are not high.

 

We aren't talking about 6 January. We're talking about terrorists breaking Federal law by protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court justices. Are you ready to get with the program, or is all you can do is stroke out with you whataboutism?

 

They're still breaking the law. Violence isn't a condition of breaking the law that prohibits protesting outside a judge's home, or a court.

 

No we are not. We are talking about AmeriCAN's standing up and demonstrating for what they believe in; JUST as the Founder's envisioned.

There was nothing whatabout, in what I said, just pointing out how AmeriCAN's approach justice. My point was IN America, we are loath to prosecute AmeriCAN's for standing up for their beliefs; NOT even when they are part of an insurrection attack on OUR Capitol. So, don't hold your breath waiting for a bunch of women to be thrown in the gulag for chanting in the streets.

 

The you're referring to are breaking the law. That's a fact and no matter how many times you try to justify it, it will still be illegal.

Stop crying and lying about 6 January, then condone these illegal protests

 

It is hard to believe you are saying these things without irony.

I genuinely thought you were both referring to dirty donny on 1/6, then noticed who wrote those quotes and realized you must have been referring to someone else.

 

Although I sympathize with these protesters’ sentiments, I profoundly disagree with targeting the judges at their homes.
Protesting in front of SCOTUS is fine, but leave their homes and families out of it.

 

The irony is the Leftists condoning terrorist demonstrations, while lying about 6 January