WATCH LIVE: Public Impeachment Hearings (Yovanovich)

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MrTLegal, Nov 15, 2019.

  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A ‘fact witness’ that has no facts is redundant.
     
  2. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did the Dems vote to impeach and remove Clinton for witness tampering?
     
  3. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    9,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. That would be "ironic", not "redundant".

    You realize that part of this process is to give us--that includes you, so pay attention---a bigger picture of Bonespurs' abuse of office. Having crazy Rudy with his 2 moon-faced buddies run amok and paint an untrue picture so that Bonespurs can fire a well-respected ambassador is part of the big picture of abuse of his office.
     
    Egoboy likes this.
  4. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All of the public testimony was new testimony.
     
  5. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Will dems vote to impeach Trump for witness tampering?
     
  6. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I prefer to use the term I saw on here for those 2 - Sputnik Goons...
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If he ever did why would they if they do not believe it is an impeachable offense?
     
  8. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Prove it, prove she did not testify as she did in the closed door. What changed especially after Trumps tweet.
     
  9. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    9,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    *rolling eyes*

    Read the transcript of her closed door session. You can make the comparison for yourself. Nobody needs to prove anything that's as available to you as it is for them.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  10. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is nothing to prove. She was testifying under path Friday. That testimony is new testimony.
     
  11. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can just roll it into the likely obstruction of justice article.
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  12. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Of course you should. And do not forget a yellow hairdo, I'm sure it'll fit into one article or another.
     
  13. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They can... if they fail to find more plausible high crime or misdemeanor :)
     
  14. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who knows? They'll clearly use any hoax which they think will sell.
     
  15. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump attacked a witness as she was testifying. She testified that she felt intimidated.

    You want to call that a hoax?
     
  16. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. I don't know if she lied, or not. At any rate, her poor professed feelings are irrelevant.
     
  17. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, an ambassador that got her feelings hurt because Zelensky didn’t trust her is not a real issue.
     
  18. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Democrats said obstruction of justice does not warrant impeachment and removal along with perjury and subornation of perjury and witness tampering.
     
  19. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes there is, your assertion this was new testimony and not previously given in her deposition. Well what did she testify to in her deposition that was not in her public testimony?
     
  20. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    9,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, the “presudint” threatening witnesses is magically acceptable in the whacko parallel universe where trumpers live.
     
  21. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He gave his opinion of her just as the witnesses have been giving their opinion of him, why is he muzzled and not they about their opinions?
     
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's YOUR assertion, what new testimony did she give in her public testimony? You do know they took the behind closed doors so they could test their questions and know in advance what would be her answers.
     
  23. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    9,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Republicans said that it was, in a much more trivial situation. But now that, and much worse, is a magical hoax.
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    155,107
    Likes Received:
    39,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What was the threat?
     
  25. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,314
    Likes Received:
    9,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it’s not. You made that utterly vacuous and pointless claim.

    The public record is available to you; use it.
     

Share This Page