IMO now that it is known that the woman killer in Calif DID have connection to ISIS we can quit playing lets pretend it is work place violence. That along with all the trappings of a radical muslim bomb making home and actions, the pretense can stop. All the media tip toed around the obvious fact this was a radical muslim terrorist attack. Apparently they didnt want to offend Obama. Obama hates the fact it was a muslim terrorist attack, because it makes him look like the fool he is for wanting to import possible Syrian ISIS members imbedded with the rest of the refugees. We simply do not need to import more possible killers into this country!!!
Why are you supporting terrorists by promoting every shooting as a win for the terrorists? INTELLIGENT people would dismiss all terrorist attacks as drunk driving accidents and Dick Cheney hunting accidents. But you have been screaming for the last two days in support of what is basically a terrorist recruiting tool by trying to give them credit for anything and everything. You play right into the enemies hands and support their war efforts.
The question is why the fool Obama wont recognize and call out the enemy. Instead he wants to invite them into the country. He needs to let them know that we know who they are, and we will be comming for them till they are all dead.
When Christian extremists shoot up an abortion clinic, progressives want to talk about that story constantly. When a Muslim terror attack happens, we shouldn't talk about it, because it helps with recruitment. Could it be that the move to downplay and ignore Muslim terror attacks is because Muslims are allies of the left and typically vote Democrat?
Let's pretend that global warming is at fault, let's pretend that it's OUR fault by going into Iraq, let's pretend that Islam is a religion of peace. Pretending is fun, I haven't pretended since I was 5 years old! - - - Updated - - - Yes, if terrrorism is the #1 topic on people's minds, then Sanders/Hillary obviously won't win the election, so they want to steer the conversation to Dem-friendly topics like global warming, or racism, or Wall Street, etc.
You continue to post false statements and argue from them. Using your logic he did exactly what you wanted him to do. In the same sentence he said it might be terrorism or it might be workplace violence. If that means he said it was workplace violence that also means it is terrorism. Does it not.
I don't think showing puppies, kittens and happy scenes on the media combats terrorism or crime. What needs to be stressed is that the killers were gunned down. What most needs to be stressed is that people need to arm themselves. Lying to the public even more is not a solution, though you apparently claim it is.
Ahh...huh?...what?? ...so tell me? what is the proper response us Americans should have? I'm having a very difficult time understanding your rationale on this "Islamist Extremist" Massacre??
She was "self-radicalized"....or more accurately: she was radicalized directly by the Qur'an....radicalized by Mohammad.
Well, I was half joking. But I do think that we Americans give such weight to these terrorist attacks that it glamorizes the event - and as such, makes great recruiting material for terrorists. I would rather we take a low key approach, let things cool a bit, then bomb the hell out of ISIS. But as we have seen before, we tend to give the terrorist the HOLLYWOOD TREATMENT and end up handing terrorists a hundred more wide eyed idiots ready to blow themselves up.
it's just been proved, there was confusion because he was a employee and had a fight right before but the evidence now shows otherwise..... you go with the evidence wherever it leads you
This entire thread is one big strawman. The President didn't say this was workplace violence and didn't say this was terrorism. He said let's wait until the investigation provides proof of what it is. You guys are just sick trying to use this attack against the President. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
That would be great advice for our friends that believe in a talking snake, a talking donkey, and a talking dead guy that will give them "eternal life" if they give up science and believe in a talking dead guy.....there's no evidence for those fairy-tale-like claims. - - - Updated - - - Putting the spotlight on religious violence helps to bring down religion. Not a bad thing.
Ok , just once , you have to learn to read and present your OWN proof . "San Bernardino, California: The woman who helped her husband kill 14 people at a holiday banquet for his county co-workers pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group and its leader on Facebook using an alias, then deleted the messages before the attack, a U.S. law enforcement official said Friday, providing the strongest evidence to date that the rampage may have been a terrorist attack." http://www.indiatvnews.com/news/wor...shooter-pledged-allegiance-to-isis-27636.html
I don't care if they vote Democrat or not, if the Muslims have their way as they've had in Europe, we soon won't be casting our votes electronically but instead forced at gunpoint by religious extremist nuts! It's all good and well to be "secular", but are the people you're taking in, secular? Would an American have taken a former Nazi member, who "pledged" that he's changed? No, because his pledge wouldn't be worth the paper it was written on. Likewise, with each incident it becomes harder and harder to believe that Muslim-Americans are "secular" in anyway whatsoever. When you see CAIR stating it's a "global" problem and not a "Muslim" problem, it becomes clear that Muslims don't want to own up to the issue of radicalization in their religion. Like you pointed out in that other thread where the girl had propaganda from the Koran about how supposedly accepting Muslims are of other people, the very next phrase was a cry for war. Mohammad covered war with peace, as an illusion to lower the defenses of the enemies of the Muslim Army. The Koran is very basically a war manual, not religious scripture or text. Islam is an army.
