I am not your assistant. Just make your point. Honestly, i will probably ignore it anyway. I have no interest in reliving the settled abortion debate. You guys can beat yourselves over your own heads woth your bibles and leave me out of it.
Your asssitant? I was simply asking for your opinion! Clearly, you aren't able to defend your position! How exactly is it "settled?" Because of Roe v Wade?
Well, if my time on these boards has taught me anything, that's a crock. Which you then immediately proved in the very next breath: The debate is settled for me. I pay no deference to any iron aged fairytale. And if we didn't have so many americans who look to that vile book for their moral queues ( I lie, they actually retrofit their personal neuroses and fetishes to the iron aged handbook, but I digress) it would not even be a discussion. By the way, when you declare someone CAN'T defend their position because they WON'T, it doesn't make you look smart. It doesn't make you seem as if you have a good grasp on logic.
That seems like a staw man. I haven't seen a single Pro-Life argument on here that is based off the Bible.
How exactly is it "settled?" Because of Roe v Wade? So only religious people are against abortion? If you COULD, then there is no reason why you WOULDN'T!
Irrelevant. In the real world, if not for the bible-beating frauds railing against abortion, there would be no significant political movement against abortion whatsoever. Take out the evangelical frauds, and what you would have left would be a movement on the scale of the following of Vermin Supreme.
Most civilized countries limit abortion to 20 weeks. I'm fine with that as long as I don't have to pay for it.
You call that "civilized"? I'm sure ancient Rome thought they were civilized when they carried out crucifixions. There is nothing "civilized" about carrying out unnecessary abortions at 20 weeks.
Why do you think they are unnecessary?....maybe they are necessary...either way, YOU don't get to decide if they're necessary Why do you think YOU should decide?????? Know what's UNcivilized? Taking away people's rights especially the right to bodily autonomy.....that is extremely uncivilized...barbaric, backwards...
We're talking about the US. So during the first two year of Trump's Presidency, when Republicans controlled Congress, they removed aid to single parent households and removed subsidized medical aid? So only religious people are against abortion?
We're talking about the scenario how it is, when abortions become illegal. And such scenario's are to be found aboard and paint a grim picture. Donald did not try his hardest to get rid of Obama care? That's indeed it's origin in the Christian/Jewish west.
Sure he did, but was there no form of subsidized medical aid before Obamacare? And what does Obamacare have to do with aid to single parent households? Totally irrelevant.
So my argument is right about them folks against abortions don't give a rats butt Them folks are the same people who refuse to give aid to single parent households / are against subsidized medical aid. You can't put a dent in it. You first question if it is so... and than you went you can't put a dent in it, you find it irrelevant.
We were talking about abortions and not about a link between Obamamcare and single parent households. Seems you're unable to discuss anything. You're ranting out one question after the other with zero arguments on this topic.
Im referring to the "late term" abortions that the right was claiming where babies were born alive and breathing and then killed etc. Most states have laws at 12-20 weeks
