You know, human beings are not property. That ended when slavery ended. My proposal was sarcasm. Sorry. Come up with a new plan. And it would appear there's no reason to take anything you say seriously.
Oh ok, so the lower middle class should be denied children, tell me about this escrow account they should set up.
"Place " it? There are way too many kids waiting for "placement" now...you certainly are oversimplifying...
I see, so merely ship it to Beverly Hills to the distribution center? Awesome....can I get a white one with blue eyes? Oh, and male....I want to use it for yard work eventually.
If only we could find a way to stop people from forcing unwanted opinion onto another person...oh we did...Laws.
Rather than raise taxes on the wealthiest, send the children of the poorest to the richest to care and provide for, send them to college and provide for their health care. Once they become responsible adults return them to their birth parents.
Yeah.....they are just commodities to be properly used after all, and those pesky parents should learn to keep legs closed. What if we just speed all this up and put collections officers in every maternity ward, we could sedate the mommys so they cant complain.
Who said anything about human beings being property? Or what has slavery to do with providing care for a child? Likewise, and there are very few who post anything here that I would take seriously.
Used for what? I was suggesting they be given the care they need by someone who can actually afford to provide it.
SHOW me the people lined up waiting to take on the millions of poor children in this country...SHOW ME. Can you address rather than avoid this: """"Place " it? There are way too many kids waiting for "placement" now...you certainly are oversimplifying..""".
Uh, see, slavery is what it's called when children are taken from their parents like so much furniture and given away..... I don't take you seriously because you seem to think that there's this big pool of wealthy people who want to take care pf poor children when they don't do it NOW...
I think you better do some research on what slavery is. I didn't say there is a big pool of wealthy people wanting to take care of poor children, but more to the point there isn't a big pool of poor people who want to take care of their own children and are instead asking government to place the responsibility on others who had nothing at all to do with the production of the child. Perhaps if the poor spent 80-100 or more hours improving their lot in life they wouldn't have as much time to produce children until which time they have become more successful?