Which part of the US will succumb, to SEA LEVEL RISE, first?

The hype is rising quite a bit faster than sea level.
California “experts” hype sea level rise by 2050 50+ times greater than actual data shows
Guest Blogger
These speculative climate model driven scenarios are inappropriate for establishing California’s government policy that commit trillions of dollars in mandated coastal sea level rise actions based upon nothing but politically…

 

Hype continues to rise faster than sea level.
NBC Sounds Sea Level Alarm at Navy Base – With No Sea Level Acceleration
SEA LEVEL OCTOBER 6, 2021

 

They have three sinking island chains, the marshalls, the solomons, and another by New Guinea.

All three are right near the Pacific Ring of Fire on the plate going under....

Search for

CNN you are making island disappear


They claim "rising seas" are behind it, never mind they are sinking and nothing else is....

In 3 million years, the Marshall Islands will be under the Earth's crust....

 

Some of those sinking islands are growing.

 

Volcanic islands sometimes do that...

The plate they are attached to is going down.

 

Higher then. Lower now.
New Data Suggest Greenland’s Relative Sea Levels Were 6 Meters Higher 1,500-2,000 Years Ago
By Kenneth Richard on 28. October 2021

Share this...
The discovery of whale bones and marine shells at ancient beach sites 32 to 36 meters above today’s shorelines have been dated to the Early to Middle Holocene. Beach ridges were still several meters higher than today during Roman and Medieval times.
The relative sea levels of the ancient past can be discerned by identifying the span of years marine shells were deposited on ancient beaches. Also, whales were as likely to wash up on shore thousands of years ago as they do today.

A new study (Souza et al., 2021) uses an alternative dating method to identify when beach ridge systems were still collection sites for sea shells along the west coast of Greenland (Disko Island). The authors find it “particularly interesting” that beach ridges were still elevated ~6 meters above modern sea levels less than 2,000 years ago, as previous studies have suggested the Disko Bay region’s sea levels should have fallen to below present sea level by this time. . . .

 

Here's another silly SLR claim.
No, Yahoo News, Sea Level Is Not ‘Guaranteed’ To Rise by Five Feet
SEA LEVEL NOVEMBER 1, 2021

Today Yahoo News published a story by senior editor David Knowles, titled “Sea level is already guaranteed to rise by 5 feet, climate scientist says.” The story and the claims made by the activist/scientist are completely false.

Without checking the data, Knowles built a whole story around a single opinion from Dr. Benjamin Strauss, who leads the media lobbying group, Climate Central.

Strauss isn’t a climate scientist, he’s a biologist and zoologist. Writing opinions about sea-level rise doesn’t automatically convert him to the title.

Strauss’s claim that five feet of future sea level rise in the “next few decades” is locked-in is little more than a headline grabber, which readily available data refutes. . . .

 

No Sea level rise in 140 years

Holocene Climate

Sydney Sea-Level Rise

11/09/2019 14:50 - Posted by Tom van Leeuwen

Excerpt:

According to the IPCC CO2-hypothesis, rising CO2-levels leads to warming. That warming supposedly expands sea-water and melts glaciers and polar ice-caps, finally resulting in rising sea-levels. They warn us for catastrophic sea-level rises in the year 2100 and beyond because of this process.

Very revealing chart in the LINK

 

As usual, the hype is rising faster than sea level.
No, Roanoke Times, Climate Change Is Not To Blame for Virginia Beach’s Flooding
SEA LEVEL NOVEMBER 5, 2021

 

Another SLR myth busted.
Yahoo News Repeats the False Claim Tuvalu Is Sinking Beneath Rising Seas, Data Show It Is Growing
SEA LEVEL NOVEMBER 9, 2021

 

Sea level hype is increasing at an accelerating rate. Sea level rise, not so much.
Sea Level Rise Misinformation: Fear Mongering By Cop26, DOD, NPR & Mainstream Media
Guest Blogger
All their fearful narratives ignore measurements of Absolute Sea Level which is the only relevant measurement by which to measure climate change. Absolute sea level rise reveals their fear mongering

 

Fascinating. Despite sea level rise, coastlines are growing.

Sea Level Alarmism Unravels As Earth’s Coastlines Are Observed Expanding Since 1984
By Kenneth Richard on 18. November 2021

Share this...
Despite sea level rise, 1984-2019 satellite data show coastlines have been globally expanding by a net +0.26 m/year.
A new study affirms what satellite data have been telling us for years: “the global coastline is prograding” (Mao et al., 2021). . . .

 

No SLR to see here. Move along.
Great Barrier Reef: No Basis for Alarming Sea Fevel Fear, Second Report Finds
Guest Blogger
The notion that the sea may be rising more rapidly at Cooktown than at other places along the Reef is fanciful.

". . . Researcher and author of the Report, Australian scientist Dr. Bill Johnston, states, “Claims that anthropogenic global warming is causing sea level to rise, particularly in the northern sector of the Great Barrier Reef, are unfounded.

“What the raw data from the Queensland Government Ports Authority website shows is an apparent rise of .036 metres per decade at Cooktown. This can be simplistically derived by comparing the start point of readings at Cooktown with the end point of the series over a period of years. However, such a method of analysing data by just comparing a start point with an end point is naïve. Instead, the mis-identified trend ‘found’ by such poor analysis is easily shown to be a series of sudden step-ups in the data, none of which is attributable to a change in climate.

“It is misleading that researchers should label a series of step changes like this as a steadily rising trend,” says Johnston. . . . "

 

Watts Up With That?

Sea Level Rise, Acceleration, and Closure
5 years ago

Guest Blogger


Guest essay by Rud Istvan

Excerpt:

Background

There is no doubt that interglacials change sea level (SL). And that sea level rise (SLR) can be dramatic on millennial interglacial time scales. That’s what happens when the vast Laurentide ice sheet (among others) melts. But sea level has changed relatively little in the past 7 millennia. We know from archeology that it rose somewhat in the Medieval Warm Period, dropped some during the Little Ice Age, and has been rising slowly since based on tide gauge records. This mostly natural variation is, from 1950-2000, about +1.8mm/year to 2.2mm/year (discrepancy explanation and references follow below). That rate is no cause for alarm. We coped with it for the past century, and can cope with it for the next.

LINK

 

The data again refute the narrative.
New Study: Pacific And Indian Ocean Sea Levels Rising ‘Much Slower Than Climate Model Predictions’
By Kenneth Richard on 3. January 2022

As Dr. Alberto Boretti asserts in a new paper, one of the main reasons why Pacific and Indian Ocean islands have not been mercilessly submerged beneath the sea as a consequence of today’s “catastrophic” climate change is that sea level rise has only been rising “very slowly” in these regions: 0.46 mm/year in recent decades. The acceleration is “an almost trivial” 0.0091 mm/year².

Succinctly, “absolute sea levels are rising much slower than in climate model predictions.”



Image Source: Boretti, 2021

 

What do you mean “supposedly”

This is basic physics water expands when heated

 

Arabian Journal of Geoscience? Really? Lols impact factor 1.87 - yeah! That one shakes up the scientific community - not!
ANY journal article that does not discuss the fact that sea rise level changes vary locally is not worth the bandwidth it takes up




https://nerc.ukri.org/planetearth/stories/93/

http://www.climatedata.info/impacts/sea-levels/pacific-islands/
If you want valid data on this go to the BOM Australia because WE do the monitoring
http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/projects/spslcmp/data/monthly.shtml

 

Please address the data and do not attack the people.

 

Part of critical analysis is reviewing where the source material comes from and as I said I could not see anywhere in that article where it addresses local variance in sea level rise, in fact I could not see anywhere where it addressed factors affecting sea level rise such as prevailing winds, currents and land masses

 

There is no existing "lid" on the ocean surfaces, your diagram doesn't match reality of ocean conditions where thermal expansion isn't being retarded as the atmosphere is in direct contact with the ocean surface.

It is clear you didn't read the article since he didn't say what YOU think he says he made clear what he meant when he posted the data on Fort Denison Sea levels.

 

Please, please stop making me laugh

 

Which part of the USA will succumb to SEA LEVEL RISE first?​

~ Hopefully it will be Washington DC - with everyone on board ! Capitola Hill has needed a good flush for years ...

 

Nah! The sheer force of the hot wind from the Capitol will keep the water at bay

 

~ There is definitely enough wind and gas coming from up there to run the entire country ...

 

Perhaps because those were not the topics of research.
And "where the source material comes from" sounds like a dog whistle for bias (anti-Arab?).