Whistleblower overheard in 2017, discussing how to remove Trump.

Are you unable to follow your own arguments? You said you wanted this WB investigated lol

 

The GAO is on record saying Obama broke the law.
The GAO is on record saying Bush broke the law.
The GAO is on record saying Clinton broke the law.
The GAO is on record saying Reagan broke the law.
The GAO is on record saying Carter broke the law.

Get it?

 

What whistleblower?

Are you talking about the hoaxblower? That's entirely different.

 

He was legally verified as a WB by the Trump admin. Your tears don’t change that.

 

Like when Clinton deleted her subpoenaed emails and smashed her phones and ipads? Is that what you mean?

Do you actually think about your posts and read them before pushing reply? Some of the stuff you've been saying is bazaar to the point where they could be coming directly from Schiff who thinks what Trump did puts us in danger of being attacked by the Russians. Yes, he really did say that.

Oh, and lol.

 

The whistleblower is NOT mentioned in the Articles of Impeachment -- and there's no list of any CRIMES in those Articles, either! And yet, the House Democrats voted to impeach the president anyway....

No, this whole thing, as Democrats have created it, is clearly bullshit of the most devious, occluded kind. Especially since those same Articles included nothing but House Democrat 'opinions' of what they subjectively think Trump did (but without even enumerating one crime), we need to hear directly from the whistleblower -- the person who got all this big hoopla stirred-up in the first place!

Is this starting to remind anyone else of the kind of crap that rabid, radical Democrats tried to pull on Brett Kavanaugh?! And then, when Blasey-Ford finally came out into the light with her 'story', it was nothing but half-assed, imprecise, bizarre 'recollections' from 'therapy sessions'...?

No WONDER these scheming Democrats don't want to have a whistleblower standing up to the bright light of public scrutiny!

 

I mean how she testified for days and turned over thousands of emails. Probably why she was totally exonerated by the fbi, the IG and then trumps DOJ.

 

The WB isn’t mentioned because everything they said was confirmed by witnesses. So there is zero relevant evidence he can share.

 

Do you really think she would turn over incriminating emails?

 

Probably not, she was kinda shady. Of course trump is RICO level shady lol

 

Uh-huh... so, there's no need for the architect of this narrative to have to provide testimony himself UNDER OATH. Got it!

When the Nazi courts dragged Jews in to answer charges made against them, often those charges were enunciated by government functionaries (the Gestapo, et al) who had heard from the 'whistleblowers' of that day. Do you SEE what happens when those who are responsible aren't made to stand up and tell their stories by THEMSELVES?!

In the United States of America, according to everyone except members of the Democrat Party, an accused person has the right TO FACE HIS ACCUSER!

. "What a ridiculous idea! WE already know the truth, and WE agree on it...!"

 

We can have every witness from the articles back to testify. Not sure much will change. Maybe from Sondland lol

 

No wonder the dems wanted to hide the "whistleblower". Schiff is in this corrupt impeachment garbage up to his pencil neck.

 

Sounds good to me! I personally LIKE the idea of having everyone who has 'drawn a hand' in this Ukraine affair -- or is IMPLICATED in it, to be made to testify and undergo public examination and cross-examination! If the idea is to get to the TRUTH, then let's DO IT!

No more 'locked doors', no more "Star Chambers", no more 'secret testimony', no more 'Gestapo' bullshit, and, no more crap going on 'behind-the-curtain'.

Let all names be known, and let all faces be shown!