White police terrorist investigation still ongoing

It’s 2019. Who wrote the Wikipedia article ???

 

The reason why I mention such an old story is because I lived in Oakland back then. Everybody knew about the OPD, and they were just like any street gang, except they had the law on their side. If you want current corruption, there's that as well.

A simple google search can give you corrupt police in any city. The blue code of silence is old, but still held to by police. They don't snitch on their own.

 

So you have nothing current. Only projection of the past onto the present fueled by an irrational hate of the police as the scum of the earth.

 

sigh...
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2...arry-hu-corruption-scandal-asian-gang-police/

That's from 2018, and only know about it because I know how to google stuff.

cops are corrupt pieces of ****, no matter when or where.

 

That’s your proof that all policemen are racially biased ???

There is no stuff to Google.

And again with the irrational hatred of the police ??? Where does that come from ??? Are you BLM ???

 

Of course they have no proof. This crap is not real.

 

Exactly. They never allow facts to get in the way of a good social justice narrative. It cost the lives of 17 in Parkland and many other places.

 

I never mentioned racially biased. I just gave a very few examples of police being completely corrupt.

No, I'm not BLM. I don't think lives matter all that much. Sometimes they do, but most lives don't matter what color, gender, or sexual orientation are just in the way.

Are "all" cops corrupt? No, of course not. When I lambast cops for being corrupt, I know there are a very few who aren't. Serpico was an honest cop. That rookie straight out of police academy was an honest cop.

The vast majority are pieces of ****.

 

No proof? I just provided two examples of incredible corruption with one... ONE police force. I could go all over the country and show similar examples. Hell, what do you think the LA riots were about?

What I did provide was a rookie cop who probably joined the police because he wanted to actually make a difference, but 10 days in, he quit and ratted the an entire police force. That resulted in 11 million dollars in lawsuits!

No proof? See, I know cops, and I know they are pieces of ****. The reason I know this is because of examples like that one guy who wasn't corrupt. 10 days in and he saw what police are, and he quit!

You can't actually talk about that, but you can simply ignore an obvious example of an entire police force that is so corrupt that a rookie was the only one that notified internal affairs.

No, you can't address that because you have nothing, just as you have nothing here. You got nothing. You can't explain how a cop 10 days in managed to bring down an entire police force. All you can do is hide your head in the sand and pretend this ain't happening.

It's happening homie.

 

This entire thread is about racial bias in the criminal justice system

And that’s all you have are a few examples. And you use those to arrive at an irrational conclusion. A very few who aren’t corrupt ??? Amazing.

Who are you going to call ???

 

I sure the hell ain't going to call the cops.

And really, a few examples? There are tons more that can be provided, but I don't think you really care no matter how many examples of blatant corruption in police forces. You could have tried to explain the few I mentioned, but you couldn't be bothered.

So why would I bother with providing more?

You can't explain a one of them.

 

Now that is irrational.

Tons ?? You've provided one example in the last decade.

 

I provided 3, actually. The riders, the guy from last year who was being bribed by the chinese mob, and the king beatdown.

<Rule 3>

 

Did anyone ever think the problem here may be the laws that enable something like this to happen?

 

King and the riders ?? How long is a decade ??

 

Before 1783 Europeans and Arabs. After 1794 Europeans and Arabs.

 

Europeans living all over the world and Arabs bought them. Slavery was not unique to the United States. In fact it was allowed and encouraged by Great Britain. If Great Britain had not allowed slave trade in their American colonies it would not have been here. One of the first thing the fledgling US government did was to outlaw slave trade. This was implemented in 1794.

Slavery in America is the legacy of Great Britain. It took a civil war with the loss of ~ 622,000 US loves (~ 5% of our population at the time) to end the slavery in the US established by Great Britain.

 

Are you seriously arguing that if Great Britain had not allowed slavery into the American colonies that the United States would have implemented it after winning independence ?? Slavery existed in the southern states of the US because it was institutionalized by Great Britain.in the American colonies. Slavery existed in the US thanks to Great Britain. The US immediately banned slave trade but could not end slavery in the individual states. Slavery was not eliminated in the US until the Civil War in which ~ 400,000 died to free the slaves. Can you name one other nation which has made such a sacrifice to eliminate slavery within their borders. When did Cuba and Brazil eliminate slavery ?? What was the last nation to eliminate slavery ??

 

You know with the left it's not whether it's true or not, that doesn't matter. It's the seriousness of the allegations that counts. You can tell by the "un-named sources", usually reported first on an anonymous kook blog then picked up by the lame stream media citing the blog as a source. I like to call it "Fake News Laundering". It's comical they think people can't figure that out.

 

You mean Southern Democrats don't you?