White Texas Property Owner Avoids Arrest After Killing Moroccan Driver

That's exactly what it is that's why you keep doing it.

If you feel you made your point then why do you need to keep telling me about it?

 

I keep dropping the "scientific evidence of a highly capable institute, while you got just your puny little opinion"-theme.

Because your replies are defying the conclusion of that scientific evidence, but you're not able to found your opinion on a souce.

 

All you quoted was an opinion bit by a college. would you please return with actual science in your link? thanks.

 

I don't need him to say it. He already gave me the evidence I need to argue it IE he was standing in headlights by his own statement and that has biological effects on the eye.
Again: We should trust his statement because it convicts him of murder 1 and we need waste no further time speculating as he's confessed to murder.
You pop the race card at everything, it makes the race card meaningless when its actually the motive.

How about you go read the ****ing reporting in the OP for ****'s sake.

Again: That's the johnny come lately version to be PC. You've seen the sources.

Its not a paperwall, its a primary ****ing source for God's sake.

 

Yes I know. You didn't read it you didn't understand it you're not using it for your argument you just name dropping.

I read it I understood it. It doesn't support your Boogeyman theory.

 

lol... their conclusion is:
we find that police require less suspicion to search black and Hispanic drivers than white drivers. This double standard is evidence of discrimination.


That's not name dropping. That is a highly capable institute proving with data and models that systemic racism is massive and everywhere in the US.
You got nothing.

 

Are you so desperate to try and convince me of this it's name dropping. Nothing from this point on will convince me otherwise.

 

Well you can accuse me of name dropping all you want, but it doesn't change their conclusion that you childishly left out in order to not respond to it.
All you got going now is indeed that their name as a highly capable institute is worth far more then your opinion as an anonymous poster on an iffy forum.
I fail to see a problem in this.

 

That is why I will.

 

you're not responding to:
All you got going now is indeed that their name as a highly capable institute is worth far more then your opinion as an anonymous poster on an iffy forum.
I fail to see a problem in this.

 

You're being intentionally deceitful, you just have a college opinion as usual and no actual measured stats by any agency, again.

 

What should I that's just rationalization.

 

Good to read you find my post rational and can't put a dent in it.

 

Rationalizing doesn't mean rational. Did you think it did?

 

All I care about that I sourced scientific research and you thought you could rebuke that with just your opinion.

 

That's not what I thought my thought was it doesn't prove your claim.

It's a correlation that you are mistaking for causation.

That's why you need more to prove your claim to anybody that didn't already believe it before you made it.

The reason why nothing will ever be done about this is because nobody believes you that didn't already before you said anything.

That's why people are fighting to keep critical race. Schools so that they can indoctrinate generation of people into accepting your conspiracy theory.

 

I proved my claim with scientific research from an outstanding source.

 

You lost, you are just digging the hole deeper lol. You have proven nothing, and simply name dropped lol.

 

If you did then you would leave it at that you wouldn't have to continue arguing with me for a week.

I either except you're so called "proof" or I don't continuing to insist on it doesn't make me accept it anymore.

So out of curiosity do you like wasting your time or is this just an obsessive compulsion?

 

you saw the link, so you know I did.

 

Link isn't proof of you claim.

 

You continue to falsely assume that correlation = causation. The study only demonstrates correlation and does not even begin to address the numerous factors involved in causation. The study does not demonstrate your thesis. Repeating it 100 times makes it no more true.

 

The source proves systemic racism. So sorry.

 

Ey? The source says that black people are pulled over a lot more then white people, even though white people statistically have a higher change of having broken the law when pulled over. The amount of black people pulled over at night drops spectacular. That does get the label it is so, because cops can't see that well what ethnicity is behind the wheel when it's dark. That's a lot more than just some causal correlation.... since it's not justifiable why it is, that black people are being pulled over that much and it caves in during the night. I put up other sources as well that black people end up being arrested for drug related offenses a heck of a lot more then white people, while white people do and deal drugs equally to even slightly more. And when convicted under the same circumstances, it's again that black people get sentenced harsher then white people. It really is at every turn that the law is giving black people the short straw. It's just a nazi like claim of white privilege to just call that just some wild fluke, when it's systematic and going on for decades without an explanation..... while racism is all over the US. There are stats out how the job opportunities are for people with the same resume but with different names. And how not only if your male/female depends on how much you get paid, but also skin color. It simply is again at every turn. So again, it's just a nazi like claim of white privilege to just call that just some wild fluke, when it's systematic and going on for decades.

You've simply been caught up by the statistics.

 

And you’re still making things up, here’s the actual evidence.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/table-43