Who would you vote for, Hillary or Elizebeth?

Hillary, a 1%er whose platform includes income inequality or Elizabeth Warren, who hates Wall Street?

WWHD - Wage gap, Job Training, College Affordability, Infrastructure Stimulus, Taxes.

WWED - Education, Infrastructure Stimulus, Renewable Energy, Level Playing Field (deregulate for small business and community banks), Workers Rights, Fair Trade.

 

Hillary, because she's going to win

I like Warren more, but she's not going to win, and you have to be in Office to make a difference. A Hillary/Warren ticket has possibilities. We have to ensure a Democratic President at least until 2032. A Republican any sooner will destroy this country.

 

Elizabeth Warren needs more time in the Senate. She also needs to get on the Foreign Relations Committee, and get some experience out side expertise on the financial services industry.

She would make a great VP candidate, though.

If it's not her, I hope Hillary keeps Biden.

 

What would be the advantage of keeping Biden?

 

Why? Is it as impeachment insurance just like Obama has used him for?

 

Looking at some documentaries of Bill before he was president shows that he ran for the working class. It was his platform from the beginning. Now with that said we will have to hear what Hillary says. If republicans come out screaming "ax the IRS, abolish abortions, cut SS, cut education, deport mothers" they will just hand her the presidency without her having to say much.

 

Lol like all that time obama spent there and all those foreign relations he learned there.

 

You forgot to add the choice of casting oneself off a cliff. In the future please be more thorough in your polling questions.

 

Neither. I'd write in Mickey Mouse.

 

Hillary holds elected office? The only thing that can destroy this country are more dems who don't know what they are talking about

 

And what has Shrillary done? Carpetbagged herself into a job as a NY senator? Clean up Bill's messes? Benghazi?

Let's look at some of her voting record................

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1379

She's a war monger-----

in favor of an October 2002 joint resolution to authorize the use of the U.S. Armed Forces against Iraq

Then sided with the enemy-------------

against a 2006 proposal to create military commissions to try unlawful enemy combatants for war crimes they had committed against the U.S

Then was against the war when Berry took over--------------

against a 2008 amendment to provide funding for U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan (in the amount of $99.57 billion for fiscal year 2008 and $65.77 billion for fiscal year 2009)

Flip-flopped on taxes-----------

against major tax-cut proposals in 2001 and 2003
in favor of tax-cut proposals in 2005 and 2006

And hates the unborn---------------

against a 2003 proposal to ban the late-term procedure commonly known as “partial-birth abortion”
against a 2004 proposal to make it an added criminal offense for someone to injure or kill a fetus while carrying out a crime against a pregnant woman
against a 2006 bill making it illegal to knowingly transport a pregnant minor across state lines in order to obtain an abortion, as a way to escape state laws requiring parental consent

what a flip-flopping POS.

 

If I had to vote for one or the other then I would very reluctantly vote for Hillary. That's because Elizabeth is a leftwing wacko, whereas Hillary only plays one on TV. Or in other words, when push comes to shove Hillary demonstrated waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay before the Anointed One was made president that she knew how to work WITH both houses of Congress and didn't let her ego get in the way of c-o-m-p-r-o-m-i-s-e. In contrast Elizabeth Warren is simply a White woman version of Barack Obama, and therefore since she is just another flavor of far left radical, meaningful compromise is not in her.

 

You meant Lizbeth Warden ... dint yuz.
The gal with the butch haircut and men's Prison warden uniform.
Tightly pressed and not a wrinkle in sight.
It's the starch ... is heard from within the camp.

 

I would vote for Liz Warren to be fed to crocodiles, while Hillary to Alligators.

 

Woah! That doesn't make logical sense. Elizabeth Warren already has got roughly three times as much meaningful national level experience than the fellow that back in 2008 certain segments of Dem Party voters and ALL Mainstream Media pundits was said to need in order to make an absolutely fabulous president. So already having far, FAR more meaningful experience under her belt than Barack Obama and waaaaaaaaaaay more impressive academic credentials and an actual history of legislative accomplishments, why would Senator Warren NOT be experienced enough to become president in 2016?

Did a certain segment of Dem Party voters finally decide that they made a huge error (as far as the necessary amount of pre-presidential experience is concerned) back in 2008?

 

Improper poll. There needs to be a box that says no way in hell would I vote for either of those fools.

 

Well, Joe Biden seems to have dementia but at least it's leftwing dementia, and so that's okay in a Dem Party vice-president. But why would Elizabeth Warren need waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more experience than first term U.S. Senator Barack Obama had before becoming president? I mean, back in 2008 the fact that he had pretty much no meaningful experience as a U.S. senator seemed like a big plus for the party faithful. So what happened?

Did certain criteria for Oval Office qualifications change during the past six years without Right of Center folk hearing about it? Or is it because Senator Warren is a female and as far as some people Left of Center are concerned a female-Democratic Senator just needs -- oh about twenty times -- more national level experience than a male-Democratic senator?

 

warren because she seems to want to conserve the middle class...along with the fact she's against lobbying

 

Hillary didn't let her Ego get in the way ... Hmm. That is tantamount to saying
Steve Irwin { Crocodile Hunter } was merely practicing how to use a baby
stroller under water when he met his tragic fate.

 

Ego is not Hillary's problem. Arrogance is her problem, and they are not the same thing. Arrogant people usually can be trained to recognize when they are letting that trait lead them too far astray, because -- especially if they are politicians -- they are more interested in attaining personal and professional goals than in being seen to be correct. But if the ego is too huge (Barack Obama's narcissism) then you DO NOT back down or compromise when you really should.

 

He has been an excellent Vice President. He understands the role, unlike his predecessor, who tried to be king.

 

Don't worry, we all know you're going to vote for whoever the GOP tells you to vote for.

 

If "neither" was a choice in the poll, I'm guessing that would be the choice.

- - - Updated - - -

That's hystericaly funny.

 

Oh ... So Dimocrats don't play that game.
You bee right.When Barack Obama was a Nominee,Hillary was pushed aside
like some washroom hag.

 

Barack Obama was never in any danger of impeachment.