World Held Hostage by American Military Madness

What country? Who was "destroyed" by the US?

 

Prove it.

Mostly due to iran.

You're great at faking numbers and making up silly stories.

Interesting how none of the million deaths in syria you attribute to assad, russia, iran or their allies - but you claim the US - which barely registers as a blip there - is somehow responsible for them.

 

It is their country, they can do what they want...it is none of the business of the USA....you are overly paranoid and bought into the media BS...NK does not have the technology to build such a weapons system...it takes a lot of technology, which NK does not have....the USA has enough defensive weaponry to defend against such an event, however, and does not have to rely on invasion and interference in their politicis....what about Pakistan? Israel? India? They have nukes...what if they turn them on the USA? What does your paranoia tell you about that?

 

They are not in NK's territorial waters. There is absolutely no reason why the U.S. or SK would wish to aggress NK. All we want is security, safety, and stability.

That is not going to happen with Kim Fatty.

The idea that if the U.S. just totally withdrew from the area and left it alone, everything would just be hunky-dory, is ludicrous.

 

It really isn't "their" country. It's one man's country, and that man is brutal, paranoid, and messianic. He is Jim Jones of Asia.

Russia and China are rational actors. Kim is not. We must never concede to his possession of nuclear weapons that can reach the U.S. Never.

 

Kim Jon-un threatened bombing the U.S. He has nukes and is trying to develop a delivery rocket. The MOAB was a message to Kim Jon-un that we can wipe his military capabilities out without using even 1 nuclear weapon. S. Korea however, is clearly in Kim's sites and capabilities. Trump did the right thing.

 

Kim Jung Fat-boy, though, now, is the exact opposite of "dangerous and reckless". But, do we have a powerful weapon to unload on him!

"When the enemy does not fear death, you must make living utterly unbearable."


Heh. I thought Lena had 'lost weight' grieving over the election results. From the pic, it looks like she spent time grieving over a half-gallon of ice cream and a bag of Oreos.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/369329.php

 

Yes it seems the USA military never reaches any of its objectives. It just waits long enough then switches to a compromise. When it's not switching goals to a new objective entirely and calling it a win, when they never finished their original job.

 

That's why President Trump's Secretary of Defense is General James "Mad Dog" Mattis (USMC)

Is also why CnC Trump ordered the Tomahawk missile attack on Syria.

Now you know the rest of the story.

 

Trump knows better than to strike N. Korea.

The missiles in Syria and the MOAB against ISIS were just some kid with a few new toys WASTING taxpayer money.

 

It's not the fault of the military. The problems lie with the politicians who stop leading and bow to pressure from leftist pressure before those objectives can be reached. The world should be grateful that these people didn't have the same influence during WWII.

 

Obama got the country $9 trillion in debt during his two terms with nothing to show for it, and no one is quite sure where the money even went. Certainly not on infrastructure.

Now there are more terrorists than ever, another homicidal dictator wanting more bribes from US politicians, and it's suddenly money that's a concern?.

 

Speaking of $9 trillion.

That $9 trillion should cover Trump's travel bills for the next 4 years.

 

We can do a comparison after his second term but at the moment it's not relevant.

 

Is there a logical reason for NK Kim to not play nice?

I guess that's rhetorical, since he seems pretty cocky.

I just can't imagine that he thinks he can win a conventional/nuclear war, or even a long term standoff,

Is it all because he's on a power trip? I just can't see an end game where he wins anything.

 

Russia or China or both are not enemy for the Trump. But Putin is Russia's enemy if he will nuclear war Vs USA and Vs China.

 

well said but I must ask, if not the US then who?
Can the superpowers keep the peace not only between themselves but globally?
Is it just being hopeful to think that we can somehow avoid another global war that puts all previous ones to shame?

Obviously we've faltered as stewards of global peace, although knowing human history its possible that we're exceeding expectations, our tribal roots are strong so true multiculturalism seems like an impossible task, at least certainly for this generation,.

Honestly its depressing to make that statement. Collectively humanity has done a pretty crappy job and I can't see the trend changing anytime soon. (Crappy is very much an understatement)

On the surface it seems that global "cooperation" is reasonably strong (obviously with exceptions, quite tragic and too numerous to count) No matter how altruistic we may pretend to be the fact remains every conflict has a winner and a loser with innocents suffering deeply.

Now it seems like we're entering a tipping point on several fronts. I'm not very optimistic.

side note:
As far as human suffering and inequality, at the end of the day I'm not sure if the ratio of winners to losers are actually moving in the wrong direction, could it be argued that equality is actually improving? Maybe yes but still not fast enough for some. 90% of them are suffering in silence so they are easy ignore.

 

The US/SK military aggressive exercises can be seen from the beaches of NK! Do you know the distance to the horizon?

You are thousands of miles away from a country that has nothing to do with you. You are the aggressors

 

Let's see. The US has been bombing these terrorists for several decades and yet there are more terrorists than ever - does that not tell you something about failed (by design) strategy?

 

The majority supports Putin's team. Stupid US propaganda brainwashed you.

 

In fact the only time the terrorists were really bombed was during 'shock and awe' and then Trumps latest strike in Afghanistan. Trump seems willing, with consultation, to let the military to do what it does best. Obama had as much success running a war as he did being a Community Organizer.

 

You are obviously brainwashed by the propaganda put out by Washington, through the MSM...maybe if the USA quit threatening little countries, and quit their idiotic sanctions, they would not need to resort to nuclear weapons...Time for a reality check, there are more countries on the planet than the USA, and it's time the great satan in North America realized that...if the great satan does not have the defensive capabilities to defend against the "boogey man" they have created in North Korea, then you better question where the trillions and trillions of dollars went that were supposedly spent on "starwars" and other "defensive systems" they have been bragging about over the years....

 

Even I agree that the US did and probably does and will do much BS on this planet, as well I agree that they should look therefor first into the mirror before blaming others etc. ... I must honestly ask you, which sort of brainwash you got!

The US did no create this bastard regime and this psycho leading it! And that this bastard is a real threat for a complete region can not be seriously denied!
And it is not the question that the US is not able to defend themselves against some missiles etc., these missiles threat a complete region with many states! This has nothing to do with MSM BS reports, but with realities ... the same realities!

 

The US has been bombing Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan for decades. The 'shock and awe' was on Iraq where there were no terrorists - you need to look at your facts