You need to listen to Fox News to actually get it!

There were millions of them!!!!!!!! Didn't you hear (wink)??

 

So saith Fox.

The point made on the OP, once again proven.

 

They could read the damn report and get the facts but can't be bothered.

 

Well Fox is the most trusted news network, it’s obvious they will say the truth in regards to mueller’s report. You’d have to go to msnbc, mother jones et al to get the lies

 

Yeah because of people were informed they'd agree with you. The only reason they don't agree is because they don't possess your sacred knowledge.

All you are saying here is "people who disagree with me are dumb" good luck winning hearts and minds with that schtick.

 

So you equate mob rule with truth?

Read the report and see what a fool they've made of you.

Not to mention... The BBC is the most trusted news source. At least get your false claims straight

 

I did. Both volumes. I came to the same conclusion as the House when they got it and fully exonerated trump

 

What people don’t realize is that black leaders were in favor of the crime law. The reason was to protect innocent black families.

 

That ^^^ is hilarious.

 

With the exception of Prof. Turley the other witnesses were already going to be called by the Dems. And Benghazi wasn't an impeachment inquiry.

Bold: Irrelevant since I did not bring it up.
Underlined: Again, Benghazi was not an impeachment inquiry.
Rest: 1: Funny how Schiff previously wanted to bring the WB out to testify before the public before...then abruptly changed his mind. Guess it wouldn't have violated the law until it was convenient. 2: There were questions asked of one of the witnesses who testified that they didn't know who the whistleblower was so kinda hard to out the WB when they don't know them huh?

If you didn't read Nadler's letter to Trump, he referenced H.Res 660. I provided the links to H.Res 660. That is where I got it from. Furthermore the "invite" wasn't given until after all witnesses that the Dems allowed were already questioned and the whole thing got to Nadler, who only called for professors and then wrote up the articles of impeachment.

H.Res 660 is quite real. I even provided links to them. Should have looked through my links.

 

The issue was the horribly racist sentencing penalties they included designed to break up homes and created dependence

 

If we're talking about "dislikes", I dislike it when people criticize style instead of the issue. But I dislike it even more when people comment on something they don't understand.

Of course my post is based on the hyperbole. What else? Most Trump loyalists listen (pay attention, believe, ...) only to the Fox echo chamber. The hyperbole you criticize emphasizes this fact and elaborates on it to point out that it's an echo chamber in which false and already debunked claims circulate as if they were fact.

The hyperbole on the OP is obvious and it's purely stylistic. Your lack of response to the point denotes you concede it.

 

But it does. Mueller did not write the report. Weismann did. The only way to come up with your bogus conclusion is to reverse the basis of our justice system into ‘guilty until the accused proves their innocence’. That’s how banana republics work and is apparently the basis for all those claiming that Trump is not exonerated by the report.

 

Maybe the poll I read was detailing American networks. I don’t have an issue with BBC

 

That too but again black leaders were in favor of getting lifetime criminals off the streets. And crime rates went down.

 

Right over your head.

 

It's worse. Even when I have tried to make it easy for them and quoted it to them, they won't believe it because they heard something different on Fox.

 

Your OP has no valid point.

 

The Banana Republic is strong. ^^^

 

It is a religion. You can't defeat faith with logic or facts.

 

I never said that you said the word "worthless".

And you make a contradictory statement here in the bold part.

Underlined: If its ridiculous then its worthless right?

Btw: Ever hear of closed door hearings? They can subpoena people from the Mueller report to come and they can ask their questions in a closed hearing, in the basement even...Dems seem to love that.

 

Yes many were at the time. Many of their “leaders” had been cooperating with the DNC

 

Obviously... With source as trusted as Fox telling people the contrary about what the Mueller Report says, why would anybody believe an unreliable source about the Mueller Report like.... the Mueller Report?

 

What? I read the Report...I’ve not heard Fox News say the contrary to what’s in it. It’s the most trusted news network for a reason.

no crimes...the House reviewed and found nothing worthy of impeachment. It’s over bro

 

I say: "People who say that Trump supporters are "dumb" or anything similar just don't get it."
And the Trump supporter/Fox consumer responds: "All you are saying here is "people who disagree with me are dumb""

Need I say more?... I didn't think so.