YouTube Removes Biotech Company's Video Showing Potential Internal UVA Light Treatment for Covid-19

WHY? I am VERY interested in ALL avenues we can be investigating and the progress on them that is what such briefings are for.

 

dis-
prefix
prefix: dis-
denoting removal of the thing specified.
"disbud"

• denoting separation.
  "discharge"
• denoting expulsion.

infect
[ in-fekt ]
verb (used with object)
to affect or contaminate (a person, organ, wound, etc.) with disease-producing germs.


-ant

a suffix forming adjectives and nouns from verbs, occurring originally in French and Latin loanwords (pleasant; constant; servant) and productive in English on this model; -ant has the general sense “characterized by or serving in the capacity of” that named by the stem (ascendant; pretendant), especially in the formation of nouns denoting human agents in legal actions or other formal procedures (tenant; defendant; applicant; contestant). In technical and commercial coinages, -ant is a suffix of nouns denoting impersonal physical agents (propellant; lubricant; deodorant). In general, -ant can be added only to bases of Latin origin, with a very few exceptions, as coolant.




Breaking that down, it would literally mean:

The removal of contaminates and disease-producing germs causing infections





This is simple english people.

 

And that justifies removing the video?

 

The only people that perceive this as a mishap are those people who are unable to comprehend the english language and desire to make something out of nothing producing fake news for political gain.

 

If you watched the briefing you would see that it wasn't at all speculative. His comments immediately followed a presentation by the Department of Homeland Security Biological Weapons Defense regarding the use of UV Lighting to kill the virus. He was simply re-iterating the information from the presentation and asking the question if it was still in development.

I am starting to be convinced that most of those criticizing the comments, including the media, have never really watched the entire thing.

 

Can you give us an example of where disinfectant was injected into the lungs of a human being.

 

Sure.

UV light is a disinfectant. Per the video in the OP, the technology company has developed a DISINFECTANT device that enters the lungs of patients to kill the virus.

Another example, we use UV lights in medical and laboratory environments during building design to kill pathogens. This is a disinfecting light. It is a disinfectant.

This technology has been available in numerous applications for many years, from water treatment, to surface decontamination, etc.

https://www.trojanuv.com/uv-basics

Just do a simple Google search for UV disinfectant.

That is literally, the terminology used, and it's accurate.

The real problem here is that YOU have always associated the term disinfectant to things like Lysol. Your limited understanding of the terminology and it's application doesn't make it wrong.

 

He had already talked about UV lighting, he was talking about disinfectants in liquid form.

 

False.

I would be willing to bet you haven't even watched the press conference. I would bet a **** ton of money actually.

The actual concept about the lighting technology was presented by The Department of Homeland Security's biological defense department during the same press conference. He didn't bring it up or suggest it, he was simply responding to it. He was responding to the study presented in the following video between 20:06 and 25:04. In this study, they actually presented the idea of using nano-meter UV lightwaves, and how that compares to destroying the virus using bleach and disinfectants. Everything he said is directly related exactly to what was presented. Trump then retakes the stage, and said what the transcript above provided. If you want the full story, watch this video starting at 20:06 to the end of his comments. The fact is, the MSN headline, and the story in general is simply absolute bullshit fake news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b16H9Srwdew

 

So every ignorant layman should get a public platform on national television to spout whatever random speculation they come up with.

I hope you don't imagine you're actually convincing anyone you really believe what you're saying.

 

Yes, but in the environment, not in the body. Trump was still ignorantly speculating that that information simply crossed from surface cleaning to internal medicine. And it still wasn't the right platform for that speculation.

 

So reporters should not be reporting on the COVID pandemic and what scientist and doctors are working on? And the President is not just every person.

 

We do procedures inside the body everyday with external probes, we take tiny little cameras into the body and scan and actually do surgeries, we've advanced beyond the witch-doctor stage.

 

It won't matter they will attack everything he says no matter what and then never admit it was the MSM and the left that injected the Lysol and Clorox false narrative.

 

Oh stop spouting crap. You know what Trump said has nothing to do with anything actual doctors are working on. Why are you so keen to spin this to make Trump look less bad?

But why his is ignorant speculation any different to that of any other layman? Again, he has a responsibility to give clear, concise and accurate information in those briefings. His random speculative questions fitted none of that criteria which is why he was objectively wrong to raise them in the briefing.

 

He had just heard of what scientist were working on and is in on all those briefings we are not privy to. YEA I want to hear about all the avenues and possibilities and no he did not tell anyone to do anything or inject anything or drink anything and clearly stated it's up to the doctors.