Zimmerman Trial (Weekend Edition) continued

You just dont get it do you? What evidence have you seen that indicated depraved mind? So when the State opens up screaming effing coons and these punks, at the same time Trayvon is telling someone that George is a creepy cracka and a nig, yet we are supposed to be outraged at the adult. So many people are going to get sued for this hoax.

 

What makes sense is Zimmerman probably tried to detain Trayvon or question him and when Trayvon didn't cooperate it probably pissed Zimmerman off and the rest is history.

 

You're missing the point entirely. YOU DO NOT speak for most black people. The very idea that you think you can say what most or all black people mean when they say something is ridiculous and, yes, I'm going there, racist. Black people do not share one mind. They are not a monolith that is incapable of thinking for themselves.

Furthermore, your assertion that when someone is called a cracker it is the person being called cracker that is racist and not the person using the racial slur is one of the most absurd things I've seen on this board. It flies in the face of logic. I was raised in a city where the majority of people were black. I've seen the term, and many others like it, used many times and it was ALWAYS the person using it who was being racist whether the recipient was racist or not.

Finally, as to your 'irregardless' vs 'regardless' tangent...I was just wondering, how do you spell pendant?

 

You could be right, but it is for at least manslaughter for the simple fact Zimmerman's actions and decisions that night lead to the death of an innocent teenage minding his own business on the way home.

 

i agree, and that's what Zimmerman's fanboys don't understand.

they act like Martin attacked Zimmerman without just cause even though the guy followed him (armed), didn't identify himself as a police officer, and was already assuming Martin had done something wrong and didn't belong simply for wearing a hoodie and being in the "wrong neighborhood."

 

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa total disinformation .....you really have no idea how ridiculous you make yourself to be...you should try and keep up with the case a tad better before coming on here and making ridiculous and false statements.....

 

It is there ... it took the state 44 days for them to reach a charge of 2nd Degree Murder ... most people are charged immediately.

 

"probably"

You know, you defending the known racist here kinda shocks me. The thought that George could "detain" or attempt to is hilarious. This kid was a machine and you know it. A racist, disrespectful effing little punk. Right now, the STATE has ESTABLISHED that fact.

 

You give the state tooooo much credit. The state was forced to prosecute by the Federal Government...deal wid it.

The state is not 'bound' by the evidence....it is totally screwed by the evidence.

 

Do you realize that all the evidence the State has in in evidence? I mean do you get that or not?

 

Thxs for the OP piece, but I will just wait for the rest of the trial to finish and see what happens.

 

I do ... Zimmyheads are emotional because Zimmy was even charged ... let alone in Day 5 of a month to two month trial

 

ever hear the term comparative negligence? If the doors is opened to allow martins facebook postings and text messages and drug usage into evidence then any chance of a manslaughter conviction follows the M2 out the door

 

What you don't get is that it took that long for the Feds to hatch up the plot to pressure Rick Scott to appoint a special prosecutor.

What happened immediately was that the State found no probable cause to charge Z with anything....it tooke the power and influence of the Feds intervention for the Special Prosecutor to be appointed for the political inquisition and show trial.

 

my prediction,

Zimmy gets charged with involuntary manslaughter and gets 2-4 years in jail. It is fair, if not even generous.

There will be riots regardless.

 

Yep.

Actually a tragedy is someone dying in a car accident, skiing accident, boat accident, etc.

Me either.

Where was he going to meet them at?

So he was just aimlessly walking around.

I believe that is exactly what he saw Trayvon as the enemy and he was trying to seek him out. We agree.

Agreed.

 

This is as wacked as your contention that Zimmy is innocent.

 

I can see what happened. Zimmy was following Saint Hoodie and that p!ssed off Hoodie. Zimmy asked what Hoodie was doing and Hoodie probably said "F*ck you, Crazy Ass Cracker." Zimmy may have escalated things by being dumb enough to say something else, or push for an answer, and Hoodie thought "screw this, I'm doing nothing wrong", and confronted Zimmy who refused to cower, Saint Hoodie decided to put Zimmy's lights out and the rest is history.

I'd bet a year's salary that's exactly how it played. Taking into account Zimmy's watch patrol attitude and Hoodie's youthful bravado, Zimmy questions a kid who it appears was not necessarily doing anything wrong at that moment, Hoodie got a wild hair that would not likely have arisen if he were ten years older.

I really believe Zimmy feared for his life. You can say he put himself in that situation which is true, but it isn't true that his targeting of Hoodie to begin with was wrong. The convenience store footage shows the dude was not exactly appearing like a model citizen. You can deny that, but then you don't appear an honest broker in the debate.

 

Zimmyheads, lol, are you 5? When the father/loser of Trayvon admitted that was not his son screaming, Sanford knew they could not charge George, but if you need to pretend that didn't happen and that Tracy didn't go all out trying to cause a stink about this, thats fine. If I had taken your position over a year ago and fought so hard against something that was a scam, I would be questioning everything I knew as well, but I don't have that problem. Hey, I haven't gotten my Kevin Cunningham blow up doll yet for joining his fan club, whats up with that?

 

i think this is what happened too - and I believe Zimmerman deserves to be charged with involuntary manslaughter for it

 

Nah, we've been debating this case based on the facts since it ever was a case, your side is the one debating based on nothing but emotional bullcrap. We had already shown the lack of evidence there was and how the prosecution had little to no hope of winning this case, it would seem that those arguing your side are emotional because the charge that you all initially agreed with in knee-jerk fashion is quickly fading from possible outcomes in terms of a verdict for the prosecution. And like people have already pointed out, the defense hasn't even started yet. In all seriousness, they really shouldn't have to do much, the prosecution did their work for them. Anything the defense presents is icing on the cake, yet it will do that much more to shred the prosecution's inept display.

 

you mean convicted but those are valid conclusions at this point in the trial, defense has not even started yet and I am still wanting that case of yuengling if martins mom or dad opens up a can of worms for defense to fish with

 

heh heh...I could not agree more. Also...I think when trayvon's g/f or whatever she was....the one he spent hours and hours texting with may have provoked trayvon into action by her suggesting to trayvon that Z was a rapist and he should run....big insult to his manhood.....and a strong motive for him to take down Z to prove to his g/f or whatever she was ---that he was not a cowardly wussy who ran home cuz some cracker was following him.

 

Well you of all folks should be able to pick them out.

Really? How many folks have you ran off after in the dark?

No, I don't know that and neither do you.

Yep, because that is what all black teenagers are to certain folks in America.

 

Except we have a phone witness who admits Trayvon confronted George, as well as used racial slurs before he attacked. So, just that alone would never hold a manslaughter charge. Unless its now a law to be afraid of black boys and stay in your cars in case they snap, which I actually agree with.