UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

7forever, you keep saying that no planes hit the towers and that they were blobs, orbs, or whatever. If that is true, then how do you explain the fact that the EWR controllers not only saw 175 on radar, but also had 175 sighted visually?

 

You have demonstrated time and time again that you have absolutely no ability to visualize things in 3D and are only able to see things two dimensionally.

Here is proof.

IF someone was going to photoshop a plane into an image, THEY WOULDN'T BUILD THE PLANE FROM PARTS!!!!! They would find a picture at the angle they wanted and they would paste that picture in.

All you've done is proven you have no ability at spatial relationships, but DO have a very healthy dose of paranoid delusions.

 

I find it hilarious that the truthers insist 9/11 was a vast conspiracy involving possibly THOUSANDS,and they couldn't even do a half a ssed job of it......they couldn't get the best CGI wizards, or get the correct model parts to 'plant' on the new york streets and rooftops...

 

Personally I think it is an ego thing for truthers. They're failures in everything else, so they try to pretend in this one thing they're actually better than everyone else because they can "see" flaws that nobody else can see. Unfortunately for them, some people just won't let them have their little ego trips without pointing out the completely retarded nature of the theories.

 

Guess that's why so many truthers are moon hoaxers/JFK conspiracists

 

Don't forget homeopathy. Haven't met a 'truther' yet who didn't buy into that nonsense.

 

Ahh yes,homeopathic 'medicine'

 

Personally, I think it is an ego thing for denialists. They're failures in everything else, so they try to pretend to defend jackass theories like planes flown by arabs who couldn't fly a kite. They're actually crazier than everyone else because they "see" flaws that everyone sees but ignore them. Unfortunately for them, some people just won't let them have their little ego trips without pointing out the completely retarded nature of their fiction.

 

You keep saying that planes hit the towers or whatever. If that is true, then why haven't you provided a single image that depicts a real boeing 767? How do you explain the fact that the EWR controllers not only saw 175 on radar, but also had 175 sighted visually and yet not a single photograph or video depicts anything but fake imagery?

 

Written without irony by a person who thinks the driver killed Kennedy...or so we must assume from his sig:

 

Typical truther response. Throw out a bunch of lies and hope nobody notices the fetid stench of the lies. So what is your evidence Hanjour, Atta and the rest couldn't fly a kite? See, it is retarded claims like that that absolutely destroy whatever truther credibility you might have.

So let's see it. You've made the claim, genius. Now back it up. Remember, your retarded opinion is NOT evidence, but a sign of paranoid delusions with megalomania thrown in for good measure.

 

We all know now that fake 175 rose in altitude in its final seconds of fake approach, thanks, to some keen eye.

 

How (*)(*)(*)(*)ing retarded! Once again you demonstrate a complete and utter lack of comprehending trajectories in 3D space. Is that the best you can do? Prove your inabilities vs. present evidence?

 

Expected end trajectory? Expected by whom?

You do realize that aircraft do not have to move in a straight line, right? Hell, the aircraft doesn't even follow the arbitrary dotted line added to the shoddy quality animated GIF image you posted.

For Christ's sake, the arbitrary line moves all over the place in relation to the stationary buildings in the frame. What a load of garbage.

 

No planes in NY ever showed up. That's a video and photographic fact.

 

Small hole, then plane shape created by secondary explosions.



Even if one accepts that a plane hit the north tower, then the small south tower hole confirms something much smaller impacted it. This proves the witnesses were right and the bogey seen in 4 broadcasts were accurately depicted.

 

Are you smoking crack? How can you claim that is a small hole? You can see the person in the picture for a reference. The wingspan of a 767 is 156 feet. There were 61 external columns per side on the WTC. The towers were 208' wide, that means leading edge to leading edge, each column is 3.4 feet apart. It also means we can see just how big the hole is. Count up the columns. I count 42. That makes 142.8 feet. The plane impacted at an angle. Straighten the angle out and you have right around the wingspan of a 767.

You lose. AGAIN.

Any other ridiculous claims you want to make that will be blown to hell and back?

 

I's just the right size for a 767....time to give up the lies

 

Are you saying the hole in the south tower is not smaller? The point is simple and factual. The hole is at least three times smaller in width and some in height. Something smaller hit tower 2, simply based on that fact alone.

 

9/11 Airplane Photo Gallery - 9-11-2001 - 2nd World Trade Center Attack
The right engine must be in between the first and second slat. The fake image shows the first slat too close to the fuselage, therefore that one fact proves it's fake. The fake engine's in front of the first slat that is too close to the fuselage. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the real planes myth.

This simple fake image raises reasonable doubt about the official south to north flight path of flight 175. New York police officer, L. Perez, took a picture of the towers and this laughable fake was added to it by person or persons unknown. The government could never prove their case to a jury because this fake image was published in magazines and assumed real, but a real defense would destroy their 911 fiction by highlighting this fraudulent image.

 

The plane is not a fake,'laughable' or otherwise....the fact that you claim so either show your lunacy or dishonesty

 

I showed you conclusively that the hole is roughly the same size as a 767. You couldn't refute it because one only has to look at the picture and look at the well documented facts to verify that I am right and you are lying your ass off.... AGAIN.

But hey. Always one to be fair. Let's say the hole is three times smaller in width. 156' / 3 = 52'. 52' / 42 visible columns means each column is only 1 and a quarter feet from column to column and that there would be 166 columns per side since each side is 208 feet wide. It also means the woman in the photograph must be a midget because to scale she would only be 7.5 inches wide. But we know this isn't true. We know from documentation that there were 61 columns per side. We know from common sense that the lady wasn't a midget.

So tell us again how that hole is so much smaller than reality tells us it is. I gotta hear this one!!!!

 

The plane is as fake as a three dollar bill, you lunatic. Do you understand how completely pathetic you are, when you lie in the face of defeat?

 

Typical liars response. Throw out a bunch of lies and hope nobody notices the fetid stench of the lies. So, what is your evidence of planes? Bring it and I will smack it down by raising doubt over and over. You can't prove a lie, only accept it. So let's see it. You've made the claim, genius. Now back it up. Remember, your retarded opinion is NOT evidence, but a sign of paranoid delusions with loyalty to stupidity thrown in for good measure.

 

The only doubt you've raised has nothing to do with 9/11 or planes. I doubt your ability to see. I doubt your ability to understand electronic media. I doubt your ability to conceptualize how 3d objects are represented in a 2 dimensional image space.