UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Dec 1, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

?

Who altered this footage?

  1. Manos Megagiannis

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  2. A TV network like CNN

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. A law enforcement agency

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Don't you know lying is a sin? The plane if fake in that pic and you must run and avoid that fact because you are defeated. Post all the fake evidence you want. That pic destroys your case clean and proper.:nana:
     
  2. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Another lie. I have evidence. You have failed at refuting the evidence. You can CLAIM the evidence isn't good enough, but that isn't the same as there being no evidence.

    Now how about addressing the fact you call me a liar, yet can't demonstrate the lie. I've demonstrated repeatedly where you lied and showed you and everyone else why it is a lie. Funny how you can't do the same.
     
  3. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You couldn't prove planes if your life depended on it because no video or photo shows a real plane. You are done and left with fiction.
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The plane if fake? :lol: Nice.

    Again, the ONLY person claiming that pic is fake is you. I will leave it up to the readers what they think of your claim. :lol: I'll guarantee you won't have many, if any, that believe your unsubstantiated claim.
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You have utterly failed at truth suppression. You have no evidence and only the incessant urge to post lies and ignore reality.:blahblah:
     
  6. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again, the only person claiming it isn't a real plane is you, and you've proven you are not a credible source. It isn't a hard choice. Believe the videos, the witnesses, and all the other evidence or believe a truther who obviously has credibility issues and denies any and all other evidence no matter how credible.
     
  7. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You're gettin' it. It is fake because it ain't real and you know that by looking at it after I pointed out why it was and is fake.
     
  8. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    So what? The imagery on 911 was fake. Do you think 175 could have gotten in between the towers? Answer the question.:nana:
     
  9. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That would be because I am not trying to suppress the truth. That is the job of a truther because the one thing a truther cannot stand is the truth. It is why they deny the evidence as you do. It is why they refuse to look at the facts as you do. It is why they have to run away instead of manning up and addressing the facts. I wouldn't want to be a truther if I was paid to be one. I have standards, integrity and credibility. Before you say it, nobody is interested in your opinion of me, least of all me.
     
  10. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    175 wasn't flying between the towers. It hit the South tower. So far the only evidence you've provided that "the imagery on 911 was fake" is your opinion that it was fake. You simply dismiss all other evidence. IF your claims were true, you would have no problem refuting the evidence just as nobody has a problem refuting your claims.
     
  11. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I don't have to refute any evidence, whether fake or real, only raise reasonable doubt and that's done with the fake pic. You could never prove it was real, therefore your fantasy is just that, a fantasy.
     
  12. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :lol: I was laughing at your inability to proof-read.

    I've looked at your claims and the only logical conclusion is you have no grasp of what an object looks like at different angles in three dimensional space. All your claims have been solidly refuted and you have no response to the refutation that one cannot pick up on any schoolyard playground.
     
  13. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It did not and could not have flown in between the towers but the drone cast its own shadow behind the towers, destroying your silly fantasy of planes.
     
  14. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong yet again. Your "fake pic" isn't fake. You failed miserably at trying to pretend it was fake. Numerous people have pointed out why you're wrong, yet you couldn't understand even the simplest of explanations. It isn't our fault you are incapable of understanding where you're wrong. Just like it isn't our fault you are incapable of addressing the lies you constantly post to this board. The most we can do is point out your logical fallacies and make sure no weak minded fool falls for your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims.
     
  15. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You looked at the truth and realized what a silly liar you are. There's one dimension, the truth, which i nailed with no challenge from anyone, least of all, you.
     
  16. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That would be because Flight 175 hit the south tower. DUH! :lol:
     
  17. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm not wrong about a single thing. The drone cast its own shadow which was acknowledged by Matt Lauer. Can a plane circle a building, patriot, at 500 mph?:nana:
     
  18. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Thanks, for admitting that the drone circled, unless you are saying it was the fake boeing? Which is it?:nana:
     
  19. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong yet again. I am saying you're completely wrong about everything because Flight 175 hit the south tower. You pretending you have a fake pic only proves you have no ability to detect a fake pic.... like pretending whoever faked the pic wouldn't just get a picture at that angle but would actually RECONSTRUCT THE PLANE PIECE BY PIECE! :lol: That one still cracks me up! Obviously you know NOTHING about how to fake a pic or figure out if a pic is faked. Haven't you wondered why you're the ONLY ONE out of the hundreds of truthers out there who whines that the pic is fake?
     
  20. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You've been proven wrong time and time again and can't even begin to address the refutation. I showed you how the south tower hole was far bigger than you claimed and was, in fact, the perfect size for a 767. Your response? You claimed I lied. You didn't say about what. You didn't address the lie. You cut and ran like you do with every other refutation of your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims. You are very consistant!
     
  21. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    To paraphrase Ron White and his observation that "You can't fix stupid" . . .

    You can't debate crazy.
     
  22. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You pretended it was real because that one fake pic defeats your belief in a lie. You have nothing and your post was ignored.:bounce:
     
  23. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You can't debate against facts that are proven by video. You are defeated.
     
  24. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Your posts are stupid and robotic.:blahblah:
     
  25. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    CNN.com - Transcripts
    This man had a north view of the towers and saw the drone coming from the west.

    OK, we actually have an "Eyewitness News" reporter, Dr. J. Atlasberg (ph) who was downtown at the time and he is on the phone with us live.

    Dr. J., what can you tell us?

    DR. J. ATLASBERG (ph), REPORTER: Hello, Steve.

    I'm actually uptown at 86th and Riverside. I can see the World Trade Center from about half the building up to the top. And about five minutes ago, as I was watching the smoke, a small plane -- I did -- it looked like a propeller plane, came in from the west. And about 20 or 25 stories below the top of the center, disappeared for a second, and then explode behind a water tower, so I couldn't tell whether it hit the building or not. But it was very visible, that a plane had come in at a low altitude and appeared to crash into the World Trade Center.

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page