UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

So let me get this straight so I can completely expose your extreme hypocricy.....

All eyewitnesses, no matter what they saw, are not evidence because you say they're not evidence.

Yet this guy's testimony is valid because he says what you want to hear.

Thank you for proving once again the utter distain truthers have for the truth.

 

Uh huh.

Keep telling yourself that.

Have you found anyone here even those that frequent the 9/11 sub forum that agrees with your orb theory? I know Scott accused you of being a "disinfo agent" and I'm pretty sure he's awfully accepting of alternate theories.

 

He saw the exactly what four broadcasts show, a small object moving toward the buildings that had to circle, which it did. The eyewitnesses who can corroborated by other evidence, video in this case, trump all others.

 

I didn't come up with the orb theory, but pointed out that it was there and laughed at the joke of calling it a plane. My work hasn't been challenged because I'm telling truth through video footage.

 

Wrong yet again. Funny how you can pretend to see something nobody else sees in four broadcasts and believe that with all your might, but ignore ALL OTHER EVIDENCE!

 

304 posts into his thread and he pretends his work hasn't been challenged! Talk about delusional opinions!!!!

 

I proved your plane fantasy by simply showing this one faked image. You would have to prove it's real, in real life. Patriot, is totally defeated and can't prove a negative, therefore all his phone calls from space would be moot based on this fake photo fact.

Can you grasp that the open flap on the left wing must be on the rear? That simple observation proves the entire image is a fraud. How would you prove to a jury that the left wing could be forward of the open flap, that's on the wrong side, attached to air?

 

And 482 posts in another thread.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/207672-fake-plane-added-south-tower-explosion.html

Plenty of challenge. Not much agreement.

Even the truthers think he's nuts. That says a lot.

 

WHAT open flap? When you start with bull(*)(*)(*)(*) you end with bull(*)(*)(*)(*). I can't even describe the foulness of what you start with.

 

What open flap are you talking about? You don't mean the mount for the engine nacelle, do you? Jesus, have you ever even seen a plane before?



The part you are talking about is the part that attaches the engine to the wing. It's face is perpendicular to the sun, and therefore reflects sunlight back at the camera which obviously has the sun to its back. That light spot behind the engine isn't an opening in the wing. It's the engine mount. Look at how far the engine mount extends beyond the rear of the engine nacelle. It's the same size as the light spot in your image.

Stop pretending that you know what you're talking about because it's so pathetically obvious that you have little understanding of aircraft design, image analysis, and a host of other topics.

 

You waste your time writing anything because it proves nothing. The left wing is attached to air, therefore the image is fake based on that simple observation.

 

I can describe what you are very simply, defeated, and without an ounce of evidence to support the plane myth.

 

This forum has some of the silliest posters I've encountered. That puts you simpletons low on the list of people wasting their time denying reality.

 

That's your opinion and you're welcome to it. Sure doesn't mean it is right. Truth is you're the one who is defeated. You fail to respond time and time again to the facts presented to you and basically have to resort to petty insults and retarded observations that are blatant lies.

 

That would be because Flight 175 hit the south tower in your dreams.

 

You have no observations because you have no defense against visual facts. You don't even try. You have no planes, no evidence, no argument, and zero ability to even enter a real discussion about the plane myth. I simply pointed out the pink elephants in 911, in the same way I did with jfk. What researchers are ignoring is very likely gonna be the truth.

 

You know, I used to think you were just having a good old time yanking everyone's chain with this stuff. Now I'm thinking you actually believe it.

WOW!!!

 

Wrong yet again. Tens to hundreds of thousands of people saw it live. You blatantly lied about the size of the hole and fell flat on your ass when confronted by the facts. Videos don't show what you claim. Your extremely incompetent opinions on whether or not pictures are real shows a distinct lack of ability in understanding objects in three dimensional space. You also seem to think people fake pictures by assembling a plane picture from individual pieces. As a semi-professional photographer with more photoshop time than you probably have computer time, I can tell you for a fact NOBODY would fake a photo that way and it would be very easy to spot if they did. Your claims are nothing more than paranoid delusional flights of fancy.

 

So, in your deluded mind, you made a decison upon what someone would do. It is easy, because I pointed it out very easily. The right engine is not uniform with the fuselage in the same way the left engine appears to be. That's not debatable. Your posts are nothing more than a simple minded fool who can't defend himself, so he denys facts.

 

Are you blind? of just heavily medicated?.....the left wing is NOT 'attached to air,it clearly is attached to the body

 

Three broadcasts show a drone, not a plane. That debunks the plane myth.

 

Are you blind? of just heavily medicated?.....the left wing is 'attached to air,it clearly is not attached to the body.

 

Those are the facts and you're welcome to deny them. Sure does mean you're wrong. Truth is you're the one who is defeated. You fail to respond time and time again to the facts presented to you and basically have to resort to petty insults and retarded observations that are blatant lies.

 

I guess you're trying to get banned. Reported. You did notice they killed your last post like this right? Better to go down in flames than face the truth, eh?

 

Is it possible for a plane to circle a building like it did on 911?