Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

translation-I am in denial and only see what I want to see thats why i wont look at links or watch videos you al post that shread to pieces the official version.

 

gives standing ovation.

 

the 9/11 apologists of course will come up with some funny ramblings to say the Bush administration REALLy wanted an honest investigation of course.They love trolling and doing this. lol.

 

yeah I guess the truth on that is a little tough for them to swallow.lol.

 

gives standing ovation.perfect pic of George W Obama.I never thought anybody would be worse than Bushwacker but Obozo is.I should have known better though because every president we have had since JFK our last REAL president not a puppet for the establishment,every president since him that gets in has always been worse than the previous one.carter being the exception.that bastard Ford participated in the coverup on the warren commission and pardoned Hitlers twin brother Dick Nixon so Ford was easily worse partipating in the coverup and pardoning that evil monster Dick.

 

not our fault you cant handle the truth you have been brainwashed.Its not our fault that you run off with your tail between your legs and wont look at the evidence,that you wont watch videos or read links that prove you wrong and your too arrogant to acknowledge you have been proven wrong.You guys are the ones that have no credibility the way you re fuse to acknowldge defeat.you wont even take the challenge to read griffins book PROVING the truth scares you.

 

gives another standing ovation.such hypocrisy.

 

WERE not the ones evading evidence refusing to watch videos or read links that shread to pieces the official version.you OCTA'S are the ones that had no credibility in the beginning refusing to do that.

 

they of course wont watch it,anything that proves their ramblings to be just that,ramblings,they avoid addressing it,never fails.

 

fir the hundreth time,its not my fault you wont watch videos or read links,wont read Griffins book and aovid facts that prove you wrong.

 

for the hundreth time,read Griffins book.till then your just rambling a bunch of B.S oh and you ignored many videos and links at the beginning people showed you as well,stop denying it.man you are dense about this,you have clearly done NO RESEARCH into this.

 

Bandwidth usage exceeded.

 

EXACTLY.I have found through experience with NET people,they always stick to their opinion despite anything you show them where practially everybody I hand out DVD'S to in REAL life,they see it that 9/11 was an inside job right off the bat,Thats cause they cant hide behind a computer I guess.

 

you nailed it,seeing how he didnt bother to watch any of the videos or read any of the links posted in the first five pages or so by others its pretty clear he is in denial and only sees what he wants to see. which is no surprise,what else would you expect out of someone who STILL goes on rambling that that the warren commission told the truth? hahahahahahahahahahahaa

Now THAT is hysterical.

 

AMEN BROTHER.could not have said it better myself.

 

your in denial and not aware of the facts.

 

thats what I keep saying. his mind is already made up so he is too close minded to look at the evidence which is why he wont look at videos or links others posted in the beginning.

 

Like Operation northwoods you are referring to?


thats proof positive our government WILL plot against the american people.duh.

 

You don't expect there to be proof, do you? 71 years later, we're still looking for proof that the U.S. didn't know Pearl Harbor was about to happen. That's the beauty of a good inside job.

 

you cant disprove it that his head went violenty backward defying the laws of physics.hahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaa

you clearly slept through junior high school science classes otherwise you would not be so ignorant about the kennedy assassination or 9/11 like you are and are a complete waste of time.

that being said,i got something on kennedy I am going to show you that I know your too arrogant to admit you have been defeated that there were multiple shooters I am going to post in my next post,just to watch you sling crap in defeat for my amusement.nobody has ever been able to debunk it so I know you cant either. hold on a few minutes, let me go get it.I mean if your still in denial on kennedy,then your clearly a waste of time for anyone to deal with on 9/11 and nobody should waste anymore time with you on this. when again,your just here to troll as you have provemn multiple times ignoring evidence that doesnt go along with your version of events.

 

If there is no proof and no hope of getting it then what is the point?

If that is true then no matter your suspicions you should eventually accept the official version and be done with it.

Otherwise, you're living your life based on nothing bu cynicism and suspicion.

What I find most galling is the snobbish and insulting attitude of many of the conspiracy advocates.

Snidely referring to people who believe the official version events as "sheep" among other things.

Apparently, it has not occurred to any among the conspiracy advocates that we could've just looked at all the evidence and decided "yeah, the official version looks the most reasonable".

 

so says the loyal Bush dupe who runs off refusing to look at vidoes or read links that shread to pieces the official version.you cant debunk this video,nobody can.face it,you cant counter it.you can just sprout off crap like this knowing your defeated and too immature to admit defeat.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-11-official-conspiracy-theory-5-minutes.html

 

hooray,gives standing ovation.yeah were still looking for THAT.

there is a great book out that is based on over 10,OOO previously declassified documents that prove what a traiter FDR was and how he committed treason same as Bush called DAY OF DECEIT.of course since he does not seek the truth,he wont read that book either.lol.

 

Undebunkable proof That oswald was innocent and multilpe shooters were used.the trolls can only fling crap in defeat like the monkeys they are.

the ones who STILL come on here and say that oswald fired the rifle of course.lol.

try to debunk these videos in my link below lone nut theorists,you cant.lol.you still want to look like fools and say oswald was the lone assassin? lol at best your best argument is that he was involed with other shooters,that falls apart easily as well in that stuff i posted below though.lol.

what all that is saying below in short below my link ,is basically two ladies went down the stairs after oswald fired the rifle and they did not see oswald pass them.Stone talks about that in his film.thats a movie that this thread starter has obviously never watched. They said the warren commission ALTERED their time frame of when they saiod they went down the stairs which is a crime itself all the warren commission members SHOULD have gone to jail for.the wc altered their testimonys because it would have proven oswald would had to pass them going down the stairs.

thats what they did with MANY witnesses,many said that their testimonys were altered.Many of them were threatened and harrassed when they gave conflicting testimony that did not go along with the warren commission which again,they should have all gone to jail for.Other witnesses were not so lucky,dying in mysterious deaths like Rose Cheramie who you see at the very beginning of JFK.

She was traveling with two men the day before the assassination who dumped her off on the side of the highway that a policeman in a patrol car found in Lousiana.He took her to the hospital and the doctors said that she talked about those men going to dallas to kill kennedy.she was on drugs so the doctors did not take her serious.After the assassination though,they notified the dallas police and sometime later Cheramie died mysteriously.Yep no plot by a group of people to kill kennedy.

http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/193550-open-shut-testimony-oswalds-gun-not-6th-floor.html


so much for your fantasys and the warren commissions that oswald did it.the warren commission altered styles and adams testimony like they did countless other witnesses because if they did not,they knew oswald would have to pass them on the stairway which he did not.altering witness testimonys is a crime the commission members should have gone to jail for.

oswald had an intent to murder kennedy? err apparently you are not aware of the party that was held at his friends house George Demorenshilds whom Marina has always said that Lee praised Kennedy at? which by the way,Demorenshield had connections to the CIA and was found murdered with a ruling of a suicide when it was known that he was going to testify before the HSCA investigation.and guess who's phone number they found in his wallet? CIA director George Bush and future president.Theres all kind of proof out there that Demorensheild and Bush wer pals.

Also you did not look at post # 1032 on previous page which exonerates oswald of having anything to do with the assassination.also you need to look at those videos I posted and just reposted through that link as wel that exonerates oswald and proves government compliticy.

you are right about one thing though,Oswald was an easy fall guy.

SO MUCH FOR THE PROPAGANDA OF THE WARREN COMMISSION THAT OSWALD FIRED A RIFLE AT KENNEDY..Read the paragraphs below.These two women Sandra Styles and Victoris Adams went down the stairs from the 4th floor after the shots were fired and according to the warren commissions timeframe,Oswald would had to pass them and they never saw him pass her.they also INSISTED the warren commission altered their testimonys,something they did with MANY witnesses which itself is a crime the commission members should have gone to jail for.

And it was through Lane’s book that Barry was introduced to the heroine of the second story he will tell. That second story is about the plight of one of these ordinary people who was swept up by events: Victoria Adams, the notable “girl on the stairs.” She was an employee who worked in the same building as one Lee Harvey Oswald. The problem caused by her presence is very simple and easily summarized. Adams, along with her friend Sandra Styles, stood on the fourth floor of the Texas School Book Depository at the moment of the murder. She testified to hearing three shots, which from her vantage point appeared to be coming from the right of the building (i.e., from the grassy knoll). She and Styles then ran to the stairs to head down. This was the only set of stairs that went all the way to the top of the building. Both she and her friend took them down to the ground floor. She did not see or hear Oswald. Yet, she should have if he were on the sixth floor traveling downwards. Which is what the Commission said he did after he shot Kennedy.

This is the first problem, in a nutshell. Why did Adams not see a scrambling Oswald, flying down the stairs in pursuit of his Coca-Cola? Because of the Warren Commission’s timeline, we know Oswald had to have gone down the stairs during this period in order to be accosted in time by a motorcycle policeman. In addition, as we are later to discover, Adams also reports seeing Jack Ruby on the corner of Houston and Elm, “questioning people as though he were a policeman.”

From here the parallel stories broaden out. For Barry began to read more books critical of the Commission. And he would then compare what was in these books with the testimony and evidence in the 26 volumes. Like many people before him, he found something rather disturbing: the evidence and testimony did not completely back up the summary conclusions in the Warren Report. The Commission had selectively chosen evidence to make their case. And they had deliberately tried to discredit witnesses and testimony that contradicted their guilty verdict about Oswald. And the witness that they did this to that really kindled Barry’s curiosity was Victoria Adams. As the author writes at the end of Chapter 1, “What if she was right?”

Adams did not find the government eager to hear her story. This is why they badgered her day and night: the FBI, Secret Service, Dallas Police, and the Sheriff’s Department. And Victoria noticed something discriminatory about all the attention she was getting: the other witnesses in her office did not receive it, e.g., Sandy Styles who ran down the stairs with her, or Elsie Dorman or Dorothy May Garner who watched the motorcade with her.

The attention didn’t stop. In fact, even when she moved to a different address these agents followed her. Even though she had left no forwarding address and her new apartment was not in her name. But they still found her. They followed her when she went to lunch. They followed her when she walked around town. When she sent a letter to a friend in San Francisco describing what she saw and did that day as a witness, the friend never got the letter. The question they posed was always the same: When did you run down the stairs after the shooting?

Then, another odd thing happened. When David Belin and the Warren Commission requested her to testify, it was her alone. Sandra Styles was not with her. In fact, Barry could find no evidence that the Commission questioned Styles at all. Further, during her appearance, Belin had handed her a diagram of the first floor of the Texas School Book Depository, the place where she and Oswald worked at that time. He asked her to point out where she saw two other employees (i.e., William Shelley and Billy Lovelady) when she arrived at the bottom of the stairway. When Barry went to look up this exhibit in the Commission volumes—Commission Exhibit 496—he discovered something odd. It was not the document in the testimony. It was a copy of the application form Oswald filled out for his job at the Depository.

Further, although Styles did not testify that day, or at all, both Lovelady and Shelley did. And as Barry read their testimony it appeared to him that the Commission was making use of them to discredit Adams. Commission lawyer Joe Ball made sure he asked Shelley when and if he saw Adams after the shooting. And when Barry read Lovelady’s testimony his mouth flew open. Lovelady brought up Adams’ name before Ball did! And he called her by her nickname, “Vickie.” Barry was puzzled as to what prompted this spontaneous reference to Adams. Did Lovelady know in advance that Ball was going to specifically ask about her?

Indeed, when she read her own testimony in the Warren Commission—and the Commission’s use of it—Adams was startled to find major discrepancies, including the time interval as to when she started down the stairs after she heard the shots. This began for her a lifelong burden of living in the shadows, avoiding any publicity dealing with her testimony or her treatment at the hands of the Commission. When her employer, publishing house Scott Foresman, offered her a chance to transfer out of Dallas to Chicago in 1966, she took it. (p. 35) While there, she actually now began to read the Warren Report. She now noted what they had done with Lovelady and Shelley. This stupefied her. Because she did not recall seeing either man after she and Styles arrived on the first floor. (p. 36)

discovering documents that bear out her veracity

also,those videos I referred to earlier as well as post # prove oswald was innocent but the government was involved.
__________________

 

I am done with it because there is nothing I can do about it. I can't afford to launch my own investigation and neither can anybody else. But I don't just accept things and neither should you.